IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

LIGO, High Gear Science Run
The Messenger
post Mar 3 2006, 03:05 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 624
Joined: 10-August 05
Member No.: 460



http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=19142

QUOTE
ST. LOUIS, Mo. -- The quest to detect and study gravitational waves with the NSF-funded Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) is now in the fourth month of its first sustained science run since achieving its promised design sensitivity, project personnel announced at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). ...

Now that the LIGO is sensitive enough to detect changes in distance a mere thousandth the diameter of a proton, Marx adds, the science return should be even greater. Recent results from the Swift satellite pinpointing the location of short gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) have also heightened astronomers' interest in the results from LIGO's current observational run.


That level of sensitivity is, in my opinion, the most incredible technical achievement since the VLA.

The very long gamma ray associated with supernova/hypernova 1996aj should also be of great interest.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
3 Pages V  < 1 2 3  
Start new topic
Replies (30 - 33)
antoniseb
post May 26 2019, 11:11 PM
Post #31


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 235
Joined: 2-August 05
Member No.: 451



Interesting. Is the GraceDb (https://gracedb.ligo.org/superevents/S190521g/view/) reporting distance in comoving megaparsecs? That seems odd, but would explain why this event was observed at all.
Can you point me to any place where they say or imply that they are reporting in comoving Mpc? Thanks in advance!

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post May 27 2019, 02:17 AM
Post #32


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4247
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Do you mean comoving vs proper distances? It's standard in cosmology to use comoving distances, since it avoids the problem of separations being smaller in the past. For close distances (redshift z << 1) proper distances are well defined and are very close to comoving ones.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Lucas
post May 28 2019, 12:24 PM
Post #33


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 24
Joined: 11-February 07
From: College Station, TX
Member No.: 1709



It appears that they are using luminosity distances (see http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_02.htm#DL for definition) based on https://lscsoft.docs.ligo.org/ligo.skymap/l...p/bayestar.html (look at min_distance parameter) and https://emfollow.docs.ligo.org/userguide/glossary.html (look at “burst range”). In these units the CMB is at ~15000 Gpc.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post May 28 2019, 05:44 PM
Post #34


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4247
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Yes, the observed gravitational wave amplitude (and frequency and its rate of change) gives the luminosity distance (once you've got a handle on the polarization), but at this level of accuracy that will agree with any other distance measure. Units, though, are comoving. The CMB is at just under 14 comoving Gpc, not 15 000 - see, eg, sect 3.4 of Planck Inflation. So at very crudely a Gpc, this merger is considerably closer.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

3 Pages V  < 1 2 3
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th May 2024 - 08:38 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.