Home Plate Speculations, Get it in now, before we know the truth! |
Home Plate Speculations, Get it in now, before we know the truth! |
Jan 25 2006, 04:10 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
Down in the Front Page Stories board, Phillip asked what all of us UMSF types think Home Plate might be made of and how it was formed. He actually wants Jim Bell's speculations, but asked for UMSF's speculations, as well.
Since we're getting close to getting there, it's time for any of your uninformed speculations out there to be recorded for all posterity... I posted the following in that thread, but it really belongs here, so I'm reposting it here and inviting discussion. I figure that a lot of us don't bother to read the boards we don't stay actively involved with, so for all of you, this is new. Otherwise, I apologize for the repetitiion! Look at the vertically-exaggerated image posted here. Home Plate seems very obviously, in this stretched image, to be the remnant of an impact crater. There are several impact crater remnants in the inner basin, here. Each seems to have been formed in a surface that was a good many meters higher than the present surface -- those missing several meters have been deflated from this terrain, by some process, leaving the shocked "pedestal" remnants of the deeper cratering forms. Remember, when you make an impact crater, you don't just affect the surface. The disruption caused by the cratering event goes well under the surface, consisting of impact melt (if the impact is energetic enough) and shocked, brecciated rocks. The crater remnants we're seeing on the surface look like the brecciated and shocked rocks that were originally created in a bowl-shaped lining beneath this cluster of impact craters. I can see traces of at least five different craters within the inner basin, here. (The ridge of rock Spirit is passing right now is, in fact, a small crater remnant.) As for Home Plate, it sits within the largest and most well-defined of these crater remnants. Maybe such layers were exhumed in *all* of the craters here, and have since been completely eroded away -- but that doesn't seem right. We have traces of several craters, and in only one of them do we see any trace of this lighter-colored material. I'd have to think that either the impact target composition was different where the Home Plate impact occurred -- which seems a little unlikely when you consider some of these impacts are only a few tens of meters apart -- or that some other substance was deposited in Home Plate crater that wasn't deposited in the other craters. (Or that has been completely deflated from the other craters, if it ever existed there.) So, logic *seems* to point towards post-cratering material deposition accounting for the light-rock ring. Personally, I think it could have been water deposition. Home Plate could have been a puddle that was filled and dried thousands of times (maybe with an internal artesian spring) that resulted in aqueous transport and deposition. Or, it could have just been a good wind trap and it trapped a lot of light-colored dust. Hard to say. I'm not only interested in the light-rock ring's composition, I'm getting very curious about the erosion process that deflated the original surface. Could aeolian erosion have deflated *that* much surface, even over a few billion years? Do we need to postulate aqueous erosion, or even glacial erosion? Maybe the specific composition and erosion patterns we see on the light-rock ring will help us puzzle that out. -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Jan 31 2006, 03:27 PM
Post
#61
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2998 Joined: 30-October 04 Member No.: 105 |
Correct, "analogous mechanism or process" is a better description than "analogy". Of course, the concept of Uniformitarianism can be applied across planetary distances as well as geologic time. Volcanism is volcanism on either planet, but there are environmental and geochemical differences so the fine details can be different, and of course, the weathering processes are quite different. And on Mars, catastrophism also plays a major role, as the effects of catastrophic events are still visible after millions or billions of years, whereas on Earth, those ancient events have been eroded or subducted out of existence. And, likely, on Mars there were more impacts than on Earth with Mars' proximity to the asteroid zone.
In a few Sols we'll be close enough to Homeplate to start collecting more puzzle-pieces and we'll increase our understanding of this small part of the planet. The sulfates are interesting, but here I look at them more as a weathering byproduct than as a evaporite. --Bill -------------------- |
|
|
Jan 31 2006, 03:51 PM
Post
#62
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1636 Joined: 9-May 05 From: Lima, Peru Member No.: 385 |
QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Jan 31 2006, 09:19 AM) My best guess would be that the Gussev impact hit a thick ice layer, among other terrains. When the whole thing fell back, there was large ice blocks, and the spaces between them filled with loose stones and sand. After, this exposed ice melt or sublimed, lefting those curious small ridges and mounds where there was spaces between ice blocks. Another "phantasm" I will add here is that homeplate would be a piece of hard sedimentary rock. When the highland formed, there was perhaps permanent water or things like that. So it would not be a surprise to find hardened sedimentary rocks, hard ones to bear the shattering and keep large dimentions: sandstone, and even limestone. The later would be a good find. I do believe that the Gusev crater was impacted by an icy asteroide as you tought. The surface Gusev is so plain and has lead me to think that crater was filled by mud (mix of water and sand) and the higher parts of Gusev crater has more boulders or stones than the lower parts, it might be due to the mud water erosion due to the gravity and leave naked stones and boulders. Rodolfo |
|
|
Guest_Richard Trigaux_* |
Jan 31 2006, 04:40 PM
Post
#63
|
Guests |
QUOTE (Richard Trigaux @ Jan 31 2006, 02:19 PM) I already note that the crest of Mitcheltree Ridge is not layered, so it is not a native ground feature. Rather some process gathered rocks here, and there are many similar features in the surrounding terrains (around other hills in the vicinity, in place which were not covered by the mudflow). So I think it is an important feature which existed in many parts of Gussev crater before mud filling. It is too linear to be impacts, it has too large blocks to be dunes, and water erosion cannot give this. It either don't look like cowpats. My best guess would be that the Gussev impact hit a thick ice layer, among other terrains. When the whole thing fell back, there was large ice blocks, and the spaces between them filled with loose stones and sand. After, this exposed ice melt or sublimed, lefting those curious small ridges and mounds where there was spaces between ice blocks. After all, ice is not the only possible material for such a process. Many materials would do the same: sandstone, jarosite, limestone... once eroded, dissolved by water or deflated by the wind, only remain those heaps of hard basalt stones we see everywhere. |
|
|
Jan 31 2006, 08:01 PM
Post
#64
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2488 Joined: 17-April 05 From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK Member No.: 239 |
Here's a thought: apart from Devon Island, which is rather old, do we know of any Terrestrial impact craters near the poles, where ice/water may have played a part in the surrounding areas? Canadian Shield chappies that are half a billion years old don't count!
A quantifiable analogy might make it all the way up to a genuine analogue... Bob Shaw -------------------- Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
|
|
|
Jan 31 2006, 08:28 PM
Post
#65
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 688 Joined: 20-April 05 From: Sweden Member No.: 273 |
QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Jan 31 2006, 10:01 PM) Here's a thought: apart from Devon Island, which is rather old, do we know of any Terrestrial impact craters near the poles, where ice/water may have played a part in the surrounding areas? Canadian Shield chappies that are half a billion years old don't count! A quantifiable analogy might make it all the way up to a genuine analogue... Bob Shaw If You mean a major impact into glacial ice or permafrost the answer is, as far as I know, no. The youngest major high-latitude impact is probably Elgygytgyn in Chukotka which is Pliocene (ca 3 million years old), but the climate in the area at that time was probably cool-temperate. There are a couple small Holocene craters in Estonia, but they are very small and the climate at the time was similar to the present. There are only a few (deep) ocean impacts known, the youngest is probably the Eltanin impact in the southern Pacific about two million years ago. This was actually too small to cause a crater because of the deep water, but is known from impactor fragments found in seabottom deposits and traces on land in South America and perhaps Antarctica. Since Antarctica has been at least partly glaciated since the Oligocene (ca 35 million years) there almost certainly has been sizable impacts into glacial ice there, but a crater that does not reach bedrock will disappear in at most a few hundred thousand years, and a crater that does reach bedrock would be quite difficult to find and even more difficult to study! Even so it might be a worthwhile to search for circular subglacial structures in Antarctice, I don't know if anyone has tried. tty |
|
|
Jan 31 2006, 08:31 PM
Post
#66
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 646 Joined: 23-December 05 From: Forest of Dean Member No.: 617 |
QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Jan 27 2006, 10:38 PM) I'm sorry, but you've given me the image of Geoffrey Boycott pushing his car keys into HP... "Well Ritchie, the air's cool and dry this morning, so the ball won't be swinging for Shane Warne. The wicket is very dry, too, so look for the pace men to have the ball lifting sharply off the basalt... especially at the Husband Hill End." -------------------- --
Viva software libre! |
|
|
Jan 31 2006, 08:37 PM
Post
#67
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 688 Joined: 20-April 05 From: Sweden Member No.: 273 |
QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Jan 31 2006, 05:51 PM) I do believe that the Gusev crater was impacted by an icy asteroide as you tought. The surface Gusev is so plain and has lead me to think that crater was filled by mud (mix of water and sand) and the higher parts of Gusev crater has more boulders or stones than the lower parts, it might be due to the mud water erosion due to the gravity and leave naked stones and boulders. Rodolfo It might well have been, but that is completely irrelevant to whether Gusev has been filled with mud or not. Any water in the impactor is instantly turned into (very) superheated steam on impact and most of it is dispersed at hypersonic speed. Any mud in the crater would be due to either (1) melting of permafrost by the impact, (2) groundwater, (3) discharge from the Ma'adim valley or (4) rain. tty |
|
|
Jan 31 2006, 09:40 PM
Post
#68
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1229 Joined: 24-December 05 From: The blue one in between the yellow and red ones. Member No.: 618 |
QUOTE (imipak @ Jan 31 2006, 10:31 AM) I'm sorry, but you've given me the image of Geoffrey Boycott pushing his car keys into HP... "Well Ritchie, the air's cool and dry this morning, so the ball won't be swinging for Shane Warne. The wicket is very dry, too, so look for the pace men to have the ball lifting sharply off the basalt... especially at the Husband Hill End." Hey, Pal. When The Commonwealth lands a rover on Mars, you can use all the Cricket terminology you want! Jeez, that game ... They don't even have real pitchers! One of the outfielders gets the ball, runs all the way in to the mound and kinda heaves the ball like a hand grenade! Naturally most of them can't even reach the plate without bouncin' the ball; foul balls count as runs, so naturally one batter can score like 7000 runs! Meanwhile out in the bleachers the elderly are passin' away, pregnant women are being delivered, and their offspring are learning to say "Well bowled." And this can go on for weeks and in the end the game can still end IN A TIE!!! I mean, Gimme a break! And a tie is a good outcome for England; otherwise they lose to one of the island colonies like New Zealand or The Falklands....keeeriss... -------------------- My Grandpa goes to Mars every day and all I get are these lousy T-shirts!
|
|
|
Jan 31 2006, 09:46 PM
Post
#69
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2488 Joined: 17-April 05 From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK Member No.: 239 |
QUOTE (Shaka @ Jan 31 2006, 10:40 PM) Hey, Pal. When The Commonwealth lands a rover on Mars, you can use all the Cricket terminology you want! Jeez, that game ... They don't even have real pitchers! One of the outfielders gets the ball, runs all the way in to the mound and kinda heaves the ball like a hand grenade! Naturally most of them can't even reach the plate without bouncin' the ball; foul balls count as runs, so naturally one batter can score like 7000 runs! Meanwhile out in the bleachers the elderly are passin' away, pregnant women are being delivered, and their offspring are learning to say "Well bowled." And this can go on for weeks and in the end the game can still end IN A TIE!!! I mean, Gimme a break! And a tie is a good outcome for England; otherwise they lose to one of the island colonies like New Zealand or The Falklands....keeeriss... It's at times like this that I'm really glad I live in... ...Scotland. Bob Shaw -------------------- Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
|
|
|
Jan 31 2006, 10:24 PM
Post
#70
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14433 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
QUOTE (imipak @ Jan 31 2006, 08:31 PM) I'm sorry, but you've given me the image of Geoffrey Boycott pushing his car keys into HP... "Well Ritchie, the air's cool and dry this morning, so the ball won't be swinging for Shane Warne. The wicket is very dry, too, so look for the pace men to have the ball lifting sharply off the basalt... especially at the Husband Hill End." Ritchie "Thank you Geoffrey, that's the forth set of keys of mine you'd got stuck into the pitch. Infact my lovely gold pen is about 6 inches under the popping crease" I'm sure there was a comedy sketch about that at some point. /english humour Doug |
|
|
Jan 31 2006, 10:50 PM
Post
#71
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1229 Joined: 24-December 05 From: The blue one in between the yellow and red ones. Member No.: 618 |
QUOTE (Bob Shaw @ Jan 31 2006, 11:46 AM) Yeah...Long as you can chuck a few cabers around, you're happy, right? -------------------- My Grandpa goes to Mars every day and all I get are these lousy T-shirts!
|
|
|
Jan 31 2006, 10:53 PM
Post
#72
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1229 Joined: 24-December 05 From: The blue one in between the yellow and red ones. Member No.: 618 |
QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 31 2006, 12:24 PM) Yeah, and we forgive you, Dougie, cause you're such a sweet guy and distinguished role model! -------------------- My Grandpa goes to Mars every day and all I get are these lousy T-shirts!
|
|
|
Jan 31 2006, 11:42 PM
Post
#73
|
|
Dublin Correspondent Group: Admin Posts: 1799 Joined: 28-March 05 From: Celbridge, Ireland Member No.: 220 |
QUOTE (djellison @ Jan 31 2006, 11:24 PM) As (possibly) the only Irish Cricket fan known to mankind (thanks to 10 years spent in the southern hemisphere) I have to say that there is no finer way to spend an extended weekend than watching a Test. preferably live, and for my part the place to do it is at St George's Park, Port Elizabeth. |
|
|
Feb 1 2006, 12:27 AM
Post
#74
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1229 Joined: 24-December 05 From: The blue one in between the yellow and red ones. Member No.: 618 |
QUOTE (helvick @ Jan 31 2006, 01:42 PM) As (possibly) the only Irish Cricket fan known to mankind (thanks to 10 years spent in the southern hemisphere) I have to say that there is no finer way to spend an extended weekend than watching a Test. preferably live, and for my part the place to do it is at St George's Park, Port Elizabeth. Good show, lads! Look's like you've made a convert. (Took you 400 years - plus 10 years of the blood rushing to his head!) -------------------- My Grandpa goes to Mars every day and all I get are these lousy T-shirts!
|
|
|
Feb 1 2006, 02:01 AM
Post
#75
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
Speaking of cricket...
I used to live in an integrated neighborhood in north Minneapolis. By "integrated," I mean that there was a good mix of white, black, hispanic and asian ethnicities represented. We were all pretty middle-middle class, and there were no real racial problems in our neighborhood. (In general, I prefer to live in a pretty evenly mixed, integrated area.) Having said that, a good many of the black youths in the area chose the "urban black" culture and look -- at this point, basically the gangsta rapper look. So, imagine my stupefaction when I passed a local park, one spring day a few years ago, to see a fair number of local young black males, in the park -- playing cricket! Wearing traditional cricket uniforms of sweaters, white pants, those silly little hats -- the whole nine yards. It was amusing, heart-warming (in a way), and above all, extremely unexpected. The latter being the reason for the formers, I'm sure. So, every time I think of cricket, I think of a bunch of young black men, in the park, wearing their cute, oh-so-very-English cricket outfits, bowling and batting... -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 3rd June 2024 - 11:03 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |