IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

MRO MOI Events Timeline, Time Zone Friendly
djellison
post Mar 10 2006, 04:38 PM
Post #1


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Z = GMT / UT, P = Pacific
Future, Unconfirmed, Confirmed

NASA TV coverage starts at 2030Z / 1230P

TCM5 was not required.
2049Z / 1249P - Tank Pressurize - nominal pressure reported (@2053Z)
2103Z / 1303P - Switch to LGA ( 2 way doppler @ 2104Z, Lock at 160bps :2105Z)
2107Z / 1307P - Turn to Burn attitude (start of turn confirmed via doppler & telem @2110Z - Slew finished @2119Z via ACS)
2124Z / 1324P - Start of MOI Burn (confirmed via Doppler @2123Z )
(tank pressure about 3psi below predicts but within margins @2131Z )
(307m/sec accumulated delta @2135Z)
(401m/sec accumulated delta @2139Z)
(588m/sec accumualted delta @2144Z)
(telem. indicated eclipse entry @2146Z)
2146Z / 1346P - Loss of signal ( confirmed on doppler @2147Z
- actual time 21:46:23Z)
2151Z / 1351P - Nominal End of Burn
2216Z / 1416P - Nominal AOS - (signal aquired - 1 way doppler @2116Z - 22:16:08 actual time)
(2 way doppler @2223Z)
2230Z / 1430p - 1641m/s burn indicated by telementry.

MRO is now orbiting the planet Mars biggrin.gif

Status check at 2245Z

Flight Software - Burn done at 20% Utilisation
Prop Nominal
ACS, Earth point on reaction wheels, Star tracker aquisition ( 8 stars ), Burn time 1641 seconds vs 1606 expected. 1000.48 m/s compared to 1000.36m/s expected.
Thermal - all temps nominal. A few alarms due to soak back from the rcs thrusters.
EPS - Nomincal, trickle charging batts ( 110% state of charge ) - 870 Watts being used, 1650 Watts available from arrays.
Telecom - Nominal, on primary equipment, uplink and downlink signals as expected, already got a command in.
Fault Prot - Quicklook, no abnormal responses to the burn, out of go-fast mode.
Nominal termination to the MOI nominal block.







http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/mro/realtime/mro-doppler_lg.html
Interesting Pre MOI PDF Presentation
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/codeq/smadir/hq06/landano.pdf



11th March 0030 Press Conf Update

Usual superlatives from senior management that don't tell us anything.

Jim Graff acknowledged help from NOAA w.r.t. Solar Weather, and the DSN's outstanding job.
Howard Eisan : MRO is safe, stable, on earth point, transmitting at 550kbps. We've earned the 'RO' of MRO. Dippled less than 10% into the batteries, commanded velocity change 2237.6 mph, overshot by 0.4mph, during the burn we underperformed by 2%, burned by 33 seconds longer to make up the difference. First hr of Nav data - orbit 35.5 hrs (predict 35.6) 264 x 28,000 mile orbit.
Rich Zurek : 2 of our 8 investigations were ones lost with MCO, one of those was also lost with Mars Observer. This completes replacement of all the Mars Observer instrumentation. We're going to knock your socks off - it's a good day.

Sally from TPS : Break for 2 weeks, what are you going to be doing (are you going to be celebrating for two weeks) - JG - stand down for w'end for a rest. Then prepare for aerobraking. ORT for Aerobraking, reconfig spacecraft for aerobraking, and some software patches to send up (9 uploaded to date, a few more to go). One other thing - we will take some early images - engineering images not science quality, make sure they work properly, processing that data on the ground to make sure the processing centres can extract the images from the data.

Sally asked when that science will start. RZ mentioned the use of aerobraking (lowest altitude is 60 miles) to understand structure of atmosphere. Sally asked if aerobraking is hard every orbit. RZ said that most of the closest approaches will be over the south pole. They dont expect big dust storms.

That's all the questions- again, kudos to Sally for asking them something. Unarguably the most important moment in Mars exploration since MER landing and potentially more important than anything between then and MSL landing scientifically, and in terms of infrastructure on orbit - $700M's worth of project - and that's three conferences where Sally was almost the only person to ask any questions. Either JPL PAO has furning the media with every single piece of information they could want before the event, or the media seem to be barely taking note of the mission because it's not as sexy as a landing ( there were plenty of spare seats in the V.K. auditorium, at Spirit's landing conf, you couldnt swing a cat in there ). Under-representation of mission rant over.

Doug
Attached File(s)
Attached File  doppler_1.mov ( 119.34K ) Number of downloads: 393
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
7 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > »   
Start new topic
Replies (15 - 29)
volcanopele
post Mar 10 2006, 09:56 PM
Post #16


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3233
Joined: 11-February 04
From: Tucson, AZ
Member No.: 23



AOS = Acquision of Signal


--------------------
&@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tty
post Mar 10 2006, 09:56 PM
Post #17


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 688
Joined: 20-April 05
From: Sweden
Member No.: 273



Acquisition of signal
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_AlexBlackwell_*
post Mar 10 2006, 09:58 PM
Post #18





Guests






Did I hear correctly? There was a 1% under- or overburn? Either is within the acceptable margin, though.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
yaohua2000
post Mar 10 2006, 09:59 PM
Post #19


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 86
Joined: 12-October 05
From: Beijing
Member No.: 526



QUOTE (Marcel @ Mar 10 2006, 09:54 PM) *
Can anyone tell me what's AOS.


acquisition of signal
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RNeuhaus
post Mar 10 2006, 10:03 PM
Post #20


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1636
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Lima, Peru
Member No.: 385



Hello, About the graph Mars Reconnaisence Orbiter Doppler, what is referring the y-axis (from 10,000 at the top and -90,000 at the bottom)?

Rodolfo
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Redstone
post Mar 10 2006, 10:03 PM
Post #21


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 134
Joined: 13-March 05
Member No.: 191



QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Mar 10 2006, 04:58 PM) *
Did I hear correctly? There was a 1% under- or overburn? Either is within the acceptable margin, though.

1 % underburn due to lower temperatures and hence lower pressures in the prop system, I think.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Mar 10 2006, 10:04 PM
Post #22


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (AlexBlackwell @ Mar 10 2006, 09:58 PM) *
Did I hear correctly? There was a 1% under- or overburn? Either is within the acceptable margin, though.



Well - until AOS we're not going to know are we? The burn finished 'in the blind' from our perspsective. It might have been performing slightly under, but the spacecraft was counting delta-V, not seconds, so it should have just burnt 1% longer.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tty
post Mar 10 2006, 10:07 PM
Post #23


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 688
Joined: 20-April 05
From: Sweden
Member No.: 273



QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Mar 10 2006, 11:03 PM) *
Hello, About the graph Mars Reconnaisence Orbiter Doppler, what is referring the y-axis (from 10,000 at the top and -90,000 at the bottom)?

Rodolfo


Presumably Doppler shift in Hz.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deglr6328
post Mar 10 2006, 10:07 PM
Post #24


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 356
Joined: 12-March 05
Member No.: 190



mro website dead? sad.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcel
post Mar 10 2006, 10:09 PM
Post #25


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 290
Joined: 26-March 04
From: Edam, The Netherlands
Member No.: 65



QUOTE (djellison @ Mar 10 2006, 11:04 PM) *
Well - until AOS we're not going to know are we?
Doug

Will we know if it's OK AT the moment of signal appearance or does the orbit assesment needs to be done first to be sure ?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RNeuhaus
post Mar 10 2006, 10:10 PM
Post #26


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1636
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Lima, Peru
Member No.: 385



Only 5 minutes away to wait about the AOS millestone!

Rodolfo

New edit: plus about 13 minutes of lag time so it is 18 minutes later.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Redstone
post Mar 10 2006, 10:12 PM
Post #27


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 134
Joined: 13-March 05
Member No.: 191



Marcel, a signal means the spacecraft is healthy. They'll need 5 minutes of telemetry to get basic details on the burn. Need 30 minutes or so to get a fix on the resulting orbit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nix
post Mar 10 2006, 10:13 PM
Post #28


Chief Assistant
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1409
Joined: 5-January 05
From: Ierapetra, Greece
Member No.: 136



We're ready MRO!

biggrin.gif


--------------------
photographer, space imagery enthusiast, proud father and partner, and geek.


http://500px.com/sacred-photons &
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
paxdan
post Mar 10 2006, 10:15 PM
Post #29


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 562
Joined: 29-March 05
Member No.: 221



NASA TV feed wow they look tense
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bjorn Jonsson
post Mar 10 2006, 10:16 PM
Post #30


IMG to PNG GOD
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2251
Joined: 19-February 04
From: Near fire and ice
Member No.: 38



AOS !!!!!!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

7 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd May 2024 - 11:17 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.