Ceres Geology |
Ceres Geology |
Jan 22 2014, 06:14 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Rover Driver Group: Members Posts: 1015 Joined: 4-March 04 Member No.: 47 |
Paper out tomorrow: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-25849871
Very exciting that we will visit this world soon! |
|
|
Jan 22 2014, 06:22 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1887 Joined: 20-November 04 From: Iowa Member No.: 110 |
Comet Piazzi ?
|
|
|
Jan 22 2014, 06:32 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1729 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
paper just out in Nature: Localized sources of water vapour on the dwarf planet (1) Ceres
|
|
|
Jan 22 2014, 07:45 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 495 Joined: 12-February 12 Member No.: 6336 |
Thank you for the heads up.
Hydroxyl. OH have previously been found to make up the main part of Ceres extremely rarefied atmosphere. So finding water vapour is not completely unexpected, it might be the source of the hydroxyl after water molecules have been dissociated by UV-radiation from the Sun. BBC stated 6 kg per second, and the diagram of the paper suggest it only happens when Ceres is in certain parts of its orbit. So I place my bet that its a slow sublimation, even though -35 C as the warmest summer day isn't exactly balmy. |
|
|
Jan 22 2014, 07:47 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 541 Joined: 17-November 05 From: Oklahoma Member No.: 557 |
|
|
|
Jan 22 2014, 07:54 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2091 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
Will anything be detectable from the camera at high phase angles, like Cassini and the Enceladean plumes, or will they have to rely on GRaND and VIR? A few kilos a second isn't that much...
|
|
|
Jan 22 2014, 08:01 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8784 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Dunno if there will be anything visibly detectable at all; kinda doubt it. 6 kg/sec outflow isn't very much, not much more than an average bathtub faucet flow. If that's a global rate rather than highly localized it's damn near gotta be just sublimation.
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Jan 22 2014, 08:14 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 706 Joined: 22-April 05 Member No.: 351 |
Could we get FedEx to deliver a mass spectrometer to Dawn post haste?
-------------------- |
|
|
Jan 23 2014, 11:49 AM
Post
#9
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 796 Joined: 27-February 08 From: Heart of Europe Member No.: 4057 |
6 kg/s sounds uninteresting but it's 518 tons per day. I don't know exact numbers for Enceladus but I saw somewhere number 200 - 250 kg/s.
So maybe with luck, Dawn will be capable of detecting Cerean atmosphere with his camera or VIR spectrometer. -------------------- |
|
|
Jan 23 2014, 01:59 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 593 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 279 |
Nprev, the ESA article states:
QUOTE Almost all of the water vapour was seen to be coming from just two spots on the surface. Super interesting! Andy |
|
|
Jan 23 2014, 02:35 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8784 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
I stand corrected, yet skeptical. Always happy to be proved wrong, of course.
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Jan 23 2014, 03:53 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 401 Joined: 5-January 07 From: Manchester England Member No.: 1563 |
Visibility will depend on the exact nature of the sources to some extent, won't it? I mean that a diffuse source will be much less visible than a concetrated, point-like one?
While this isn't exactly a discovery on par with finding a duplicate Earth hiding behind the Moon, this is a nice little appetite whetter for Ceres. And it does confirm that there is probably a fair bit of water ice there. -------------------- |
|
|
Jan 25 2014, 12:32 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 30 Joined: 3-October 07 From: Fátima - Portugal Member No.: 3927 |
... and the diagram of the paper suggest it only happens when Ceres is in certain parts of its orbit. As the Ceres orbit has an eccentricity of 0,080 and an orbital period of 4,6 years, is it possible that Dawn spacecraft will be able to stay in Ceres orbit until its perihelion and so, to tentatively observe the surface spots from where this water vapour is originated? |
|
|
Jan 25 2014, 01:47 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 159 Joined: 4-March 06 Member No.: 694 |
According to the Wikipedia page, Ceres has an axial tilt of about 3 degrees, similar to Jupiter and Venus.
-------------------- I call heaven and earth to witness against you this day, that I have set before thee life and death, the blessing and the curse; therefore choose life, that thou mayest live, thou and thy seed.
- Opening line from episode 13 of "Cosmos" |
|
|
Jan 25 2014, 11:34 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 102 Joined: 8-August 12 Member No.: 6511 |
As the Ceres orbit has an eccentricity of 0,080 and an orbital period of 4,6 years, is it possible that Dawn spacecraft will be able to stay in Ceres orbit until its perihelion and so, to tentatively observe the surface spots from where this water vapour is originated? Ceres' last perihelion was September 2013, just four months ago. Aphelion will be at the end of 2015 and the next perihelion in April 2018. Dawn will arrive there in late March 2015 and (IIUC) currently has a nominal one-year mission. So it will certainly be there through aphelion. It would have to hang around another two years for perihelion. I don't see anything that would prohibit this, though some orbital manipulation may be required -- lower orbits burn fuel faster, as the spacecraft has to make more adjustments. If the water vapor production really is driven by sublimation -- a reasonable assumption, but who knows -- then we'd expect it to be peaking in the months after perihelion when Ceres' surface is warmest, i.e. right around now. So in that sense Dawn would be arriving at exactly the wrong time. But we really don't know. We'll start getting respectable imaging of Ceres' surface a couple of months before Dawn arrives, i.e. January 2015. So... we wait. Doug M. |
|
|
Jan 25 2014, 11:44 PM
Post
#16
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 102 Joined: 8-August 12 Member No.: 6511 |
An interesting question I haven't seen addressed: what's happening to the water?
Obviously most of it is being lost to space. But even with Ceres' weak gravity, you'd expect some water to recondense at "cold traps" -- cooler spots on Ceres' surface, i.e. in shadowed crater bottoms and at the poles. The technical term for this is "volatile transport", and we see it in some other places in the Solar System, like Jupiter's moon Callisto. (That's why all the impact craters on Callisto's icy surface look slumped and eroded.) If even 1% of the water vapor were to be recaptured, it would accumulate in the polar regions at a rate of a micron or two per year. That may not sound like much, but over astronomical time you'd see meters of accumulated condensation. But we don't see that. Ceres is a very dark body (its albedo is around 0.06, almost as dark as fresh asphalt) and water frost is bright. There are lighter patches on Ceres, but there don't seem to be bright ice caps at the poles. In a little while we'll know more. Patience... Doug M. |
|
|
Jan 26 2014, 01:26 AM
Post
#17
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
Speaking of behaviors of processes over astronomical timeframes always runs the risk of ignoring the nature of relatively short-term phenomenah which occur in bursts and blurps. (For example, the overall process of accretion over a 4.6-billion-year period resulted in the Earth-Moon system, but the day of the Big Whack created, in mere hours, the conditions resulting in the current system, its angular momentum, Earth's rotational period, etc.)
If non-homogeneous concentrations of volatiles exist within Ceres' outer crust, maybe water ice spurts and sublimates for a few thousand years and then stops, then later methane ices do the same thing over a few thousand years, etc. Each episode of volatile transport would have its own effect on the surface coatings at the poles and in other cold traps, depending on the specific volatiles being transported and how they react to sunlight and radiation over time, etc. Ceres being so much closer to the Sun than the Jovian and Saturnian moons, it's hard to make direct comparisons, but it's possible that Ceres has (or had) a wider range of volatiles than the moons we've observed, and definitely sees a higher solar constant than do the outer planet moons. These would seem to be important factors, too. As you say, though, much will become more clear as we approach Ceres with Dawn and get some of the hard data that will let us answer some of these questions. -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Jan 26 2014, 12:04 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 495 Joined: 12-February 12 Member No.: 6336 |
@Doug M
Previous to this observation, there had been one observation that found small amounts of water vapour over the north pole. That lead to a speculation that there might be polar caps of water ice. These older observations get a mention in the Dawn mission page at NASA even, and also at this AAS meeting quoted here. So cold traps at the poles is a clear possibility, even actual polar caps - the question is the amount. The Dawn mission page use the phrase "seasonal polar caps" whereas the later paper states "substantial ice deposits on shadowed crater slopes ". |
|
|
Jan 26 2014, 07:13 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 293 Joined: 22-September 08 From: Spain Member No.: 4350 |
Any chance of telling if these localized sources correlate with the bright spots in Hubble images?
|
|
|
Jan 26 2014, 07:35 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2091 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
According to the map in the Nature paper, yes they do (scroll down to figures).
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v505/...ature12918.html |
|
|
Mar 12 2015, 01:08 PM
Post
#21
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 107 Joined: 1-August 14 Member No.: 7227 |
Map of supposed water vapour spots:
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v505/...ature12918.html http://www.esa.int/Our_Activities/Space_Sc...rf_planet_Ceres Recent (march 2015) map: http://www.scientificamerican.com/slidesho...res-slide-show/ |
|
|
Mar 12 2015, 07:30 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 715 Joined: 3-January 08 Member No.: 3995 |
|
|
|
Mar 13 2015, 08:21 AM
Post
#23
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 107 Joined: 1-August 14 Member No.: 7227 |
|
|
|
Mar 13 2015, 09:42 AM
Post
#24
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 107 Joined: 1-August 14 Member No.: 7227 |
Recent paper:
"THE POTENTIAL FOR VOLCANISM ON CERES DUE TO CRUSTAL THICKENING AND PRESSURIZATION OF A SUBSURFACE OCEAN." http://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2015/pdf/2831.pdf QUOTE interior evolution models for Ceres [e.g. 2-5] suggest that differentiation is likely, forming a layered structure with a rocky interior (possibly with a separated iron core), overlain by water and ice layers. Furthermore, these models suggest that there is sufficient heat available that a liquid water layer could survive under an icy exterior to the present day. I can't yet understand where this heat come from. Does "[e.g. 2-5]" mean "references from [2] to [5]"?. QUOTE Because ice takes up a larger volume than the equivalent mass of water, the freezing of liquid water onto the base of an icy shell will cause the shell to expand slightly and lead to tensile stress in the shell. This also has the effect of increasing the pressure in the ocean, possibly to the point of driving liquid to the surface. So the model suggests NOT that there's enough heating to create a water geyser (as I supposed), but there's a "squeezing" of the ocean by the ice crust. QUOTE For Ceres (r= 475 km), which is intermediate in size between those bodies, we assume as our initial condition that the rocky core is ~300 km in radius with an overlying ocean and an icy shell 25 km thick. This corresponds to the state of Ceres 500 Myr after its formation in the models of [5]. In the models of [5], the shell thickens over the subsequent 4 Gyr at an approximately linear rate of ~20 km/Gyr. QUOTE cracks can propagate to at least 200 km depth, which is about the maximum possible thickness of an ice shell for Ceres. QUOTE for every 1 km of thickening of the shell, approximately 25 m of liquid could erupt over the entire surface but beware of QUOTE The requirement that the ice layer behave like an intact, elastic shell could pose a problem, especially in the case where the tensile strength of ice is exceeded well before the ocean pressure is sufficient to drive material to the surface.
|
|
|
Mar 13 2015, 02:07 PM
Post
#25
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
I can't yet understand where this heat come from. Here my try: Assumptions: Ceres' radius: r = 475 km = 4.75e5 m Ceres' shape: approximately spherical Ceres' mass: m = 9.43e20 kg Ceres' mean surface temperature: T1 = 168 K Temperature below ice layer (using the melting point of water): T2 = 273 K Thickness of ice layer: L = 25 km = 25e3 m Approximated thermal conductivity of ice: k = 2.0 W/(m K) Simplified assumption for K-40 decay: 1.311 MeV per atom are released on decay to Ca-40 = 1.311e6 * 1.602e-19 J = 2.10e-13 J Half-life of K-40: t_1_2 = 1.248e9 years = 3.938e16 s Mass of 1 mole K-40: 0.03996 kg Ratio of K-40 to K total: 120 ppm = 1.2e-4 Calculations: Surface area of Ceres: A = 4 pi r˛ = 4 pi * 475 km = 2.84e6 km˛ = 2.84e12 m˛ Thermal conductance of the ice layer: G = k A / L = 2.0 W/(m K) * 2.84e12 m˛ / 25e3 m = 227e6 W/K. Transfered power: P = G * (T2 - T1) = 227e6 W/K * (273 K - 168 K) = 227e6 W/K * 105 K = 23.8e9 W = 23.8 GW Decaying ratio of K-40 per second: (1 - (1/2)^(1s/t_1_2))/s = (1 - (1/2)^(1s/3.938e16 s))/s = (1 - (1/2)^2.5391e-17)/s = 1.76e-17 / s Mean power per K-40 atom per second = (1.76e-17 / s) * 2.10e-13 J = 3.696e-30 J/s = 3.696e-30 W Number of K-40 atoms to provide transferred power: 23.8e9 W / 3.696e-30 W = 6.44e39 = 1.07e16 * 6.022e23 = 1.07e16 mole. Mass of K-40 to provide transferred power: 1.07e16 * 0.03996 kg = 4.276e14 kg. Mass ratio of K-40 needed to provide transferred power: 4.276e14 kg / 9.43e20 kg = 4.53e-7. Mass ratio of K needed to provide transferred power 4.53e-7 / 1.2e-4 = 3.78e-3 = 0.378% As a comparison: Potassium makes up about 2.6% of the weight of Earth's crust. Links to data, notions, and formulas: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_conductivity http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermal_conduction http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ceres_%28dwarf_planet%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_thermal_conductivities http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potassium http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotopes_of_potassium http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Potassiu...ecay-scheme.svg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potassium-40 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronvolt http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mole_(unit) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sphere#Surface_area http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Half-life#For...ponential_decay |
|
|
Mar 13 2015, 03:30 PM
Post
#26
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 495 Joined: 12-February 12 Member No.: 6336 |
Nice work there Gerald, really good even.
I really tried to find a mistake there, but you seem to have made a good estimate. A layer of liquid water might be possible, especially if there's small amounts of other radioactive elements adding to the energy budget as well. Before reading the paper mcgyver linked, I never did take the pressurisation into account, so I capitulate to the idea that Ceres indeed could have one subsurface ocean - but I still not saying it's there, even though I bet 'some' website featuring space related news quite likely will make a bold statement of 'discovery' any day after this. =) |
|
|
Mar 13 2015, 03:59 PM
Post
#27
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
|
|
|
Mar 14 2015, 01:56 PM
Post
#28
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 495 Joined: 12-February 12 Member No.: 6336 |
Thanks a lot for the review! There is always a risk to make a mistake with this lot of numbers. So you thank me for trying to show you're wrong. Well serious, it's a good back-of-the-envelope kind of calculation to show the idea is worth considering. To actually get to the bottom of things (silly pun intended) one have to go quite further to include the pressure of the water down there, some numbers provided in the paper. That gives how the water might rise in the tube even in the very low gravity of Ceres. It is at that point these guys from the Planetary Science Institute, CIT and JPL adds the fact that there should be heavier material on top of the ice sheet covering Ceres that increase the pressure further. Then adding at least a partial melting of ice, at the highest part the tube. Here I am lazy and enter my own calculations made for the aquifers in a lime rock environment that keeps flowing trough the winter in sub arctic conditions. the flow of water here is a magnitude lower in general, and the strongest flow I got just barely is the same ballpark (4 litres/s) as the measurements made by Herschel. But I still don't get this to work, if water have frozen out and it ended up with one of a handful of pockets with water of very high salinity - perhaps. Or more heat is needed, meaning the presence of heat produced by the decay of some other long lived elements. Salts also would prevent freezing in the tube, and even melt some ice of lower salinity in the lower parts. And at that point I realise that some press releases have been mentioning salts and not ice as one explanation for the bright spots. They certainly have done the calculations better than me, even so it was one interesting exercise to get a glimpse of how the planetary scientists have been thinking. |
|
|
Mar 15 2015, 01:33 AM
Post
#29
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 45 Joined: 12-February 15 Member No.: 7397 |
Recent paper: "THE POTENTIAL FOR VOLCANISM ON CERES DUE TO CRUSTAL THICKENING AND PRESSURIZATION OF A SUBSURFACE OCEAN." http://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2015/pdf/2831.pdf Coincidence or not, that paper appears to have been released on March 1, more than two weeks ahead of next week's Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, and a day after I proposed the same volcanism-driving mechanism in post #542, on the 'Dawn approaches Ceres' topic. They make no mention of salt deposits though, as a consequence of the release of seawater, hence I expect we'll see evidence of that in spectral results from Dawn. Final confirmation of volcanism should occur by May or June, when central pits show up in those bright spots. |
|
|
Mar 15 2015, 03:08 AM
Post
#30
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10196 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
"Final confirmation of volcanism should occur by May or June, when central pits show up in those bright spots."
...could occur, if central pits show up... Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Mar 15 2015, 10:13 PM
Post
#31
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 107 Joined: 1-August 14 Member No.: 7227 |
"Final confirmation of volcanism should occur by May or June, when central pits show up in those bright spots." ...could occur, if central pits show up... Phil It looks like there's actually "something high" under the bright spot! hipass of the baked dem ( 0 to 360 mapping) http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...st&p=218867 |
|
|
Mar 16 2015, 02:01 PM
Post
#32
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 401 Joined: 5-January 07 From: Manchester England Member No.: 1563 |
Recent paper: "THE POTENTIAL FOR VOLCANISM ON CERES DUE TO CRUSTAL THICKENING AND PRESSURIZATION OF A SUBSURFACE OCEAN." http://www.hou.usra.edu/meetings/lpsc2015/pdf/2831.pdf Having read that paper I'll float (he, he, he.. geddit.. no?)an idea that may be rediculously naive: wouldn't a major impact be good way for a pre existing a crack partway through the crust (due to the mechanism proposed in the paper) to be opened up and form a vent? The paper mentions impacts as a source of fracturing sans tensile cracking, why not combine them? -------------------- |
|
|
Mar 18 2015, 11:42 AM
Post
#33
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 107 Joined: 1-August 14 Member No.: 7227 |
Some ceres maps I found around can help studying the bright spots:
Near infrared mapping of Ceres surface http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=21032 The composite albedo deviation maps of Ceres through F555W (upper panel), F330W (middle panel), and F220W (lower panel) filters http://eclipsephase.com/ceres-surface-geography |
|
|
Mar 18 2015, 12:47 PM
Post
#34
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 107 Joined: 1-August 14 Member No.: 7227 |
And my 3d reconstruction of bright-spots crater (4 MB animated
http://i.imgur.com/c7WRvT7.png STL file: http://lc84.altervista.org/vba4.stl |
|
|
Mar 18 2015, 01:41 PM
Post
#35
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 4252 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
The DEM has got to be considered very preliminary near "feature 5" (ie the brightest bright spot). For one thing we may be seeing more PSF than real structure, which would affect the calculation of elevations. For another, if, as recent reports claim, the brightness of feature 5 varies with time, that could also affect the DEM, since you'd normally assume that to be constant when calculating the elevations.
|
|
|
Mar 18 2015, 03:07 PM
Post
#36
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 107 Joined: 1-August 14 Member No.: 7227 |
|
|
|
Mar 18 2015, 03:20 PM
Post
#37
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1729 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
the first result when you google it
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_spread_function |
|
|
Mar 18 2015, 03:56 PM
Post
#38
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 4252 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
How is it calculated? Basically you would combine images from different viewpoints (different frames from the rotation sequences). That contains depth information just like an anaglyph does. But if the details of the bright spot aren't reliable then the elevations you get also aren't reliable. |
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 08:46 AM
Post
#39
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 107 Joined: 1-August 14 Member No.: 7227 |
Well, then the DEM data in that area are totally useless. :-(
Better focusing, then, on tweets about #LPSC2015 in these days: there's a lot of talking on Ceres, and one tweet on the fact that the bright spot is visible above the rim (in unreleased images) and hence is probably a "geyser" ( http://twitter.com/Laurent_Montesi/status/...0697387008?s=02 ) |
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 09:06 AM
Post
#40
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 107 Joined: 1-August 14 Member No.: 7227 |
Nature article on Ceres about icy plume over bright spot:
http://www.nature.com/news/bright-spots-on...=TWT_NatureNews |
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 03:04 PM
Post
#41
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Great find on the DEM -- I'm really surprised to see it released!
If a DEM is calculated from image pairs, I think positional accuracies are no better than some small number of pixels, right? Which is to say it's not really worthwhile to use this one to analyze the detailed rim and floor structure of the crater that the bright feature is in. -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 04:23 PM
Post
#42
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 656 Joined: 20-April 05 From: League City, Texas Member No.: 285 |
If a DEM is calculated from image pairs... I'm not sure how these DEMs were produced, but in principal all the images from the rotation sequence could contribute simultaneously to the DEM, potentially yielding sub-pixel resolution of the topography. Also, the shadowing along the terminator might contribute further. Or it could be all shape-from-shading, in which case take with a grain of salt. Tracking common features in multiple images is tricky and error prone. Anyway, I agree that the bright spots are indeed so poorly resolved that I'd hesitate to make much of their DEMs. |
|
|
Mar 19 2015, 04:26 PM
Post
#43
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10196 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
The basic rule is always going to be... don't expect reliable results when you are looking at things close to the resolution of the data. For images, we can't interpret reliably if we have fewer than 4 or 5 pixels across the object of interest - and even more would be better. Stereo DEMs are even more removed from the raw data (the images), so their effective resolution is lower still. Their resolution will be determined by the spacing between common points, the identifiable points matched in the two images so parallax can be measured. If you look at the images you can get a sense of how far apart those points would be.
So please don't read too much into tiny details in images or DEMs. Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
Mar 24 2015, 08:37 PM
Post
#44
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 890 Joined: 18-November 08 Member No.: 4489 |
QUOTE "If a DEM is calculated from image pairs..." -- and this I'm not sure how these DEMs were produced, the dem was extracted from the vertex plate model baked the displacement using blender and compensated for the difference in radi of the mesh and sphere ftp://naif.jpl.nasa.gov/pub/naif/DAWN/misc/ceres the README ftp://naif.jpl.nasa.gov/pub/naif/DAWN/mis...s/aaareadme.txt a 32 bit isis3 cub is here https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6ZYAd08tZ...iew?usp=sharing |
|
|
Mar 25 2015, 05:17 PM
Post
#45
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 656 Joined: 20-April 05 From: League City, Texas Member No.: 285 |
the dem was extracted from the vertex plate model ... To clarify... I was referring to the photogrammetry leading to the creation of the shape (or vertex plate) model. Given that model, the DEM is simply the difference between the shape model and the corresponding ellipsoid fit. Eventually that will be a geoid fit, but these are early days. |
|
|
Mar 17 2016, 12:06 PM
Post
#46
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
From Science Daily website:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/...60316082727.htm |
|
|
Dec 17 2016, 02:47 PM
Post
#47
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 495 Joined: 12-February 12 Member No.: 6336 |
Polar ice found on Ceres, if this ice is trapped there after outgassing of Ceres itself is not clearly stated on this page from Max Planck institute, though I have a hunch it might be the case.
|
|
|
Jan 23 2017, 02:57 AM
Post
#48
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 316 Joined: 1-October 06 Member No.: 1206 |
Haze at Occator crater
on dwarf planet Ceres https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1701/1701.05812.pdf p |
|
|
Jan 31 2017, 04:33 PM
Post
#49
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 52 Joined: 16-November 06 Member No.: 1364 |
I examined the original haze claim and found it to be complete nonsense:
https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.08550 |
|
|
Feb 1 2017, 10:37 AM
Post
#50
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
Thanks for posting that here. Figure 15 on page 40 of the PDF version you linked to gives the clearest picture I've seen of the central white spot in Occator crater. (For anyone tempted to stop at the abstract or just skim the less technical parts of the conclusions I would say: don't miss the illustrations in that paper!)
|
|
|
Mar 7 2017, 09:57 PM
Post
#51
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 423 Joined: 13-November 14 From: Norway Member No.: 7310 |
Some Dawn scientists think that the dome in the centre of Occator is a cryovolcanic feature about 4 million years old (Occator itself is stated as being 34 million years old), and that at this point, it cannot be ruled out that cryovolcanic activity is still present at a lower level. The haze interpretation is also doubled down on, and it is mentioned that it could be possible evidence for ongoing activity.
QUOTE "The age and appearance of the material surrounding the bright dome indicate that Cerealia Facula was formed by a recurring, eruptive process, which also hurled material into more outward regions of the central pit”, says Nathues. "A single eruptive event is rather unlikely," he adds. A look into the Jupiter system supports this theory. The moons Callisto and Ganymede show similar domes. Researchers interpret them as volcanic deposits and thus as signs of cryovolcanism. The MPS scientists assume that a similar process is active on Ceres. "The large impact that tore the giant Occator crater into the surface of the dwarf planet must have originally started everything and triggered the later cryovolcanic activity," says Nathues. Following the disruption of the impact, the brine researchers suspect either as a complete layer or as scattered patches under the rocky mantel was able to move closer to the surface. The lower pressure allowed water and dissolved gases, such as methane and carbon dioxide, to escape forming a system of vents. At the surface, fractures appeared through which the saturated solution erupted from the depth. The deposited salts gradually formed the present dome. http://www.mps.mpg.de/Cryovolcanism-on-Dwarf-Planet-Ceres -------------------- |
|
|
Mar 8 2017, 01:11 AM
Post
#52
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 495 Joined: 12-February 12 Member No.: 6336 |
By studying the domes and bright areas at Occator scientists at Max Planck Institute, Institut für Endlagerforschung & University of Winnipeg have found signs hinting of an subsurface ocean or reservoir containing brine water with dissolved CO2 and methane.
Evolution of Occator crater on Ceres. Edit: This is the actual paper, I did only see Danieles post above but when double check on my post now noted that Habukaz have posted the pressrelease. |
|
|
Mar 10 2017, 02:46 AM
Post
#53
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 401 Joined: 5-January 07 From: Manchester England Member No.: 1563 |
Some Dawn scientists think that the dome in the centre of Occator is a cryovolcanic feature about 4 million years old (Occator itself is stated as being 34 million years old), and that at this point, it cannot be ruled out that cryovolcanic activity is still present at a lower level. The haze interpretation is also doubled down on, and it is mentioned that it could be possibly be evidence for ongoing activity. http://www.mps.mpg.de/Cryovolcanism-on-Dwarf-Planet-Ceres 4 million years is geologically recent, but would it be recent nough to imply suburface cryolava present today? -------------------- |
|
|
Mar 10 2017, 12:31 PM
Post
#54
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 120 Joined: 26-May 15 From: Rome - Italy Member No.: 7482 |
By studying the domes and bright areas at Occator scientists at Max Planck Institute, Institut für Endlagerforschung & University of Winnipeg have found signs hinting of an subsurface ocean or reservoir containing brine water with dissolved CO2 and methane. Evolution of Occator crater on Ceres. Edit: This is the actual paper, I did only see Danieles post above but when double check on my post now noted that Habukaz have posted the pressrelease. Glad to see that my hypothesis of June 5, 2015 was the same or like to recent work :-) |
|
|
Apr 8 2017, 01:18 PM
Post
#55
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 495 Joined: 12-February 12 Member No.: 6336 |
Transient exosphere found at Ceres.
And the solar wind turned out to be the explanation for it being there at times and then not. |
|
|
Oct 26 2017, 05:16 PM
Post
#56
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 715 Joined: 3-January 08 Member No.: 3995 |
Ceres gravity map:
https://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/catalog/PIA22083 Interestingly, Ahuna Mons is centered on the highest (indicated) gravity anomaly, while Occator is in the lowest. |
|
|
Oct 26 2017, 09:01 PM
Post
#57
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2091 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
And following-up on that: https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/2017/10/2...mnants-at-ceres
We might have yet another ancient ocean world! Not bad, Dawn! |
|
|
Oct 27 2017, 01:50 PM
Post
#58
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 495 Joined: 12-February 12 Member No.: 6336 |
The papers start to pile up high enough to build another launch tower for a Ceres mission.
This one conclude that organics on the surface might be native to Ceres after all. |
|
|
Oct 27 2017, 02:30 PM
Post
#59
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 684 Joined: 24-July 15 Member No.: 7619 |
And following-up on that: https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/news/2017/10/2...mnants-at-ceres We might have yet another ancient ocean world! Not bad, Dawn! That's becoming common eh?
Aug. 11, 2016 NASA Climate Modeling Suggests Venus May Have Been Habitable https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/n...-been-habitable Earth. Yes. Moon? Oct. 19, 2017 An Atmosphere Around the Moon? NASA Research Suggests Significant Atmosphere in Lunar Past and Possible Source of Lunar Water https://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/news/...lunar-past.html Mars? March 5, 2015 NASA Research Suggests Mars Once Had More Water Than Earth’s Arctic Ocean https://www.nasa.gov/press/2015/march/nasa-...-s-arctic-ocean Ceres? |
|
|
Dec 6 2017, 06:31 AM
Post
#60
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 316 Joined: 1-October 06 Member No.: 1206 |
Is this a joke?
https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1712/1712.01320.pdf I get that its a preprint archive and all that, but....sheesh P |
|
|
Dec 6 2017, 11:45 AM
Post
#61
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1444 Joined: 26-July 08 Member No.: 4270 |
Describing what are obviously craters as "small conical hills" ... maybe this paper is a better fit for viXra.org instead.
-------------------- -- Hungry4info (Sirius_Alpha)
|
|
|
Dec 6 2017, 01:49 PM
Post
#62
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 41 Joined: 11-April 07 From: London, U.K. Member No.: 1957 |
Is this a joke? https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1712/1712.01320.pdf I get that its a preprint archive and all that, but....sheesh P This is great - perhaps one of the most endearingly mis-guided and unintentionally hilarious things I've seen in a while. It actually has the line, "Those beauties are really in the eyes of a beholder." on page 4. Figure 39 nearly made me spit coffee over my keyboard. But if you think that garbage only appears in arXiv, try this paper of dubious statistical quality, which I have to assume was peer reviewed by an actual human being... https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-13355-7 |
|
|
Dec 7 2017, 12:01 AM
Post
#63
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 4252 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
Is this a joke? https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1712/1712.01320.pdf I get that its a preprint archive and all that, but....sheesh I don't follow the earth and planetary subject area, but the main physics/astro/cosmo areas are extremely well controlled and a paper like this would not get through. This author hasn't appeared on the arxiv before so would've needed endorsement, which I think is more or less automatic if you have an email address from a known institution. His email address is from the Nauchno-Issledovatel'skiy Fiziko-Khimicheskiy Institut Im. L. Ya. Karpova so that may have let him in easily. But that's a chemistry institute so it's unclear if he has any planetary science training. The postings are also supposed to be moderated and he's clearly slipped through that net. |
|
|
Dec 7 2017, 03:50 AM
Post
#64
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 715 Joined: 3-January 08 Member No.: 3995 |
Well that was painful.
|
|
|
Dec 7 2017, 04:35 AM
Post
#65
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 159 Joined: 4-March 06 Member No.: 694 |
I very rarely post anything here apart from me giving valuable money to keep this wonderful site alive and running.
Even former editors of peer reviewed journals have said that up to 40% of all stuff that appears in peer reviewed journals are either of very poor poor quality or even worse a lot of the medical science stuff that appears cannot be re-produced by future research or was constructed is such a way to make the re-production of prior results all but impossible. -------------------- I call heaven and earth to witness against you this day, that I have set before thee life and death, the blessing and the curse; therefore choose life, that thou mayest live, thou and thy seed.
- Opening line from episode 13 of "Cosmos" |
|
|
Dec 7 2017, 08:22 PM
Post
#66
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 4252 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
|
|
|
Dec 8 2017, 12:04 AM
Post
#67
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 866 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Santa Cruz, CA Member No.: 196 |
|
|
|
Mar 15 2018, 02:36 AM
Post
#68
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2091 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
Newly published results showing quite a bit of activity on Ceres as it nears perihelion (next month). More ice in shadowed areas, and detection of calcium carbonate on Ahuna Mons: https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=7081
|
|
|
Mar 15 2018, 03:22 AM
Post
#69
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8784 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Have to wonder if this is partially endogenic, though I can't think of a mechanism unless Ceres is somehow unusually rich in core radioactives. However, since these phenomena appear to coincide with perihelion, a more pertinent question is why Ceres looks so much like a rather ordinary rocky small body dominated by cratering given how fast-acting some of these processes may be.
Volatile deposits may be isolated and widely dispersed, the regolith may vary substantially in thickness, the thermal properties of surface and near-surface materials may vary, all or none of the above. A great many possibilities and questions spring to mind; be fun to see how the pros weigh in. -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Mar 15 2018, 04:44 PM
Post
#70
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2530 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 321 |
On Ahuna Mons, I wonder how intricate the dynamics of downslope mass movement might be. It seems to have been most recently "groomed" by downslope movement, which could mean one single 360° event or a few, or a more or less ongoing process. Perhaps impacts/quakes trigger new flows. And then what is exposed to the surface could be overturned depending on the structural mechanics, and what we see in vis/IR spectroscopy may be a superficial covering that isn't representative of the rest of the structure. This wouldn't require active endogenous geology, if impacts are triggering avalanches, though it doesn't exclude active geology, either.
|
|
|
Aug 5 2018, 05:30 AM
Post
#71
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 316 Joined: 1-October 06 Member No.: 1206 |
A Possible Brine Reservoir Beneath Occator Crater: Thermal and Compositional Evolution and Formation of the Cerealia Dome and Vinalia Faculae
[Abstract] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/artic...019103517306371 P |
|
|
Jun 15 2019, 01:57 AM
Post
#72
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 866 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Santa Cruz, CA Member No.: 196 |
|
|
|
Dec 28 2019, 07:46 PM
Post
#73
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 436 Joined: 14-December 15 Member No.: 7860 |
|
|
|
Aug 10 2020, 07:11 PM
Post
#74
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 293 Joined: 22-September 08 From: Spain Member No.: 4350 |
There's some new papers on Ceres
"Recent cryovolcanic activity at Occator crater on Ceres" https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-020-1146-8 "Evidence of non-uniform crust of Ceres from Dawn’s high-resolution gravity data" https://www.nature.com/articles/s41550-020-1019-1 |
|
|
Aug 11 2020, 08:39 PM
Post
#75
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 98 Joined: 30-November 05 From: Antibes, France Member No.: 594 |
Excellent news regarding the salts of Occator Crater!!!
One may assume that for small planetary bodies like Ceres, the volatiles like H, O or H2O should have vanished into outer space over geologic time scales. But curiously, we see here what seems to be the remnant of a subsurface layer or pocket of a water-dominated liquid. And no tidal forces engendered by a large planetary body... Eager to see a rover in Occator Crater! |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st June 2024 - 03:53 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |