IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

The western route, 5th leg after stop at Absecon / Reeds Bay
Tesheiner
post Jul 11 2009, 05:57 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Time for a new thread.
After moving southwards for ages, the "detour" by the western path has started with a 60+ meters drive on sol 1942.
Attached Image


There are no images yet --they should be available on the next update-- so this image was calculated solely based on the rover's mobility info. I'll update the route map later.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
31 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 99)
Marz
post Jul 12 2009, 03:03 AM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 311
Joined: 31-August 05
From: Florida & Texas, USA
Member No.: 482



QUOTE (Tesheiner @ Jul 11 2009, 11:57 AM) *
After moving southwards for ages, the "detour" by the western path has started with a 60+ meters drive on sol 1942.


Whoa, didn't realize Oppy was ready to move! I thought the integration at Absecon would take a few more sols. Kinda sad that it looks like we won't get to see the small Talisman crater on the approach. Is there a projected path for the western route (ustrax's route was amazingly prescient, so now I'm lost).

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MarkG
post Jul 12 2009, 05:18 AM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 146
Joined: 31-October 08
Member No.: 4473



So, on this last leg to the Martian west, across mostly pavement, what were the Right Front wheel's currents like?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Jul 12 2009, 08:46 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



QUOTE (Marz @ Jul 12 2009, 04:03 AM) *
Is there a projected path for the western route (ustrax's route was amazingly prescient, so now I'm lost).


I made a quick guess here a while back. I don't have Ustrax's gift though. wink.gif

The 'official' route hasn't been made public yet.

James



--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BrianL
post Jul 12 2009, 03:34 PM
Post #5


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 530
Joined: 21-March 06
From: Canada
Member No.: 721



I thought we would have had a revised TraxMap ™ by now. wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Jul 13 2009, 08:49 AM
Post #6


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



QUOTE (BrianL @ Jul 12 2009, 04:34 PM) *
I thought we would have had a revised TraxMap ™ by now. wink.gif


By your special request... wink.gif
Attached Image

Paths converge once more...not in the direction I expected (no-more-spines please!) but the important thing is that...we're roving! smile.gif


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Astro0
post Jul 13 2009, 11:52 AM
Post #7


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



Ustrax: "...not in the direction I expected..."

That got me thinking about taking the western route...laugh.gif
Attached Image


Just for laughs folks. I'm sure that Oppy doesn't think that there are "settlements over there". rolleyes.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BrianL
post Jul 13 2009, 01:21 PM
Post #8


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 530
Joined: 21-March 06
From: Canada
Member No.: 721



I meant really revised, Rui. What's your take on where the westward route will run?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Jul 13 2009, 02:24 PM
Post #9


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



QUOTE (BrianL @ Jul 13 2009, 02:21 PM) *
I meant really revised, Rui. What's your take on where the westward route will run?


Haven't tought about that Brian...here's the original image of my proposed route with a rough sketch of the westward route in orange...:
Attached Image

I still prefer the Eastward one... tongue.gif


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Jul 13 2009, 04:36 PM
Post #10


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



nice view
Attached Image

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nirgal
post Jul 13 2009, 05:32 PM
Post #11


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 713
Joined: 30-March 05
Member No.: 223



QUOTE (MarkG @ Jul 12 2009, 07:18 AM) *
So, on this last leg to the Martian west, across mostly pavement, what were the Right Front wheel's currents like?

I would be interested in the answer to that question, too ...

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jul 13 2009, 05:49 PM
Post #12


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



You just beat me to it, Alan. You're right, fantastic view!

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BrianL
post Jul 13 2009, 06:21 PM
Post #13


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 530
Joined: 21-March 06
From: Canada
Member No.: 721



<clink> <clink>

What are those hills and how far away are they? Have they always been visible and I just haven't been paying attention?

Edit: Wait a minute, what direction is that? If that's east, then obviously that's our goal. When I first looked at it, I thought these were some new shots in the direction we're heading.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Jul 13 2009, 06:29 PM
Post #14


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



QUOTE (BrianL @ Jul 13 2009, 07:21 PM) *
<clink> <clink>


Oh boy...this is going to be a long night...ahahah
http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...st&id=18432
From my ignorant perspective (I am sure James will come up with the right answer...) we can see Cook near the center and elevation to its left (Molyneaux) , we can also see the twin peaks (Banks and Solander) on the North rim but what's new are all those hills to the left... smile.gif
Are we seing the West/South part of the rim? Edgecombe and friends? smile.gif


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jul 13 2009, 06:52 PM
Post #15


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4247
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Thanks for the heads up, guys, these are great views!

The most prominent peaks on the far left in these images are on the near (west) rim of Endeavour. All the fainter peaks are the rim of Iazu crater behind Endeavour. We've had similar views before, but the air is looking clearer now. Compare the latest view:

http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...PGP2599L5M1.JPG

with the view from sol 1898:

http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all...3AP2356L6M1.JPG
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Jul 13 2009, 07:00 PM
Post #16


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



Fred, if that's Iazu, let's wrap this Endeavour story fast... smile.gif
How tall is that martian beast?... blink.gif


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Jul 13 2009, 07:35 PM
Post #17


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



Fred's right that is Iazu again - great view.

As to the height, Google Earth says that the peaks are 200 - 300 m above the surrounding plain.
In that image the peaks are about 10 pixels high - at roughly 40km that makes what we can see the top 100m or so.


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Jul 13 2009, 08:20 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Wow, what a view! cool.gif
I saw that sequence (Iazu's pancam) in the plan but forgot to check it afterwards. The current view at the horizon is, imo, the most exciting since the beginning of this mission.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Jul 13 2009, 08:25 PM
Post #19


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



James, sorry for asking but, that's not all Iazu, right? There are some features to the right of Cook that belong to Endeavour, or am I wrong?
I was taking this previous image as a reference:
http://photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov/figures/PIA11837_fig1.jpg


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jul 13 2009, 08:39 PM
Post #20


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Craig Covault - speaking live on SpaceflightNow's video coverage of the shuttle launch - has just been saying that MRO has found *clays* inside Endeavour crater... and as (paraphrasing here) clays don't form/last long in acidic water, this suggests that the water there was, for at least some time, less acidic than previously thought...

Anyone know anything about this..?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jul 13 2009, 09:29 PM
Post #21


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4247
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (ustrax @ Jul 13 2009, 09:25 PM) *
that's not all Iazu, right?

Right. See this post if you need convincing...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Jul 14 2009, 02:00 AM
Post #22


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



Stu, my understanding is that the "clays" that MRO has been discovering are the phylosilicates that have been discussed at length, especially in the site selection deliberations for MSL.

I'd have the think that any clays found within Endeavour would have to be remnants of earlier aqueous conditions than those which were involved in laying down the Meridiani sulfate sandstones. And considering there must be pieces of the crust underlying those sandstone deposits in the walls of Endeavour, I guess that's not terribly surprising.

Now we need to really hope and pray that Oppy can make it to some of the clay deposits and give them a careful examination. For one thing, clays are the most likely places to find fossilized life remnants, especially bacterial fossils. While Oppy is not all that well equipped to look for anything like that, it could very likely constrain the possibilities in a favorable manner.

Take *real* good care of Oppy for us, guys... now, more than ever, it seems the payoff if we get to Endeavour could be truly astounding.

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Jul 14 2009, 05:59 AM
Post #23


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



Yeah. When Endeavour became the goal, I perused the raw mineralogical maps available from MRO. I found a very small patch of possible phyllosilicates on the far, eastern side of the crater. It would be significant if newer imagery, or reprocessed imagery was indicating phyllosilicates to be more common.


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Jul 15 2009, 08:57 PM
Post #24


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Today was another driving sol, where almost 70m were covered in a WNW heading.
I would expect a heading change to NW on the next two or three driving sols to avoid some "purgatoids" due west.
Attached Image


PS: Map update tomorrow, if time permits.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Jul 16 2009, 05:54 AM
Post #25


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



I realized that I should have better referenced the CRISM imagery I referred to in my previous post. The raw imagery I referred to is here. Apparently my recollection of the location was faulty. The small anomaly I described was not on the far, eastern side of the crater. It is closer to the center of the crater. It is on the far, eastern side of the image.

Of course, all the normal cautions apply to any interpretations of such non-calibrated imagery.


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Jul 16 2009, 08:31 AM
Post #26


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2921
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



I while ago somebody wrote, I think it was Phil, that we were heading to higher terrain due in a few kilometers (2?).
Does somebody know whether it's still the case or can we say the western route is just flat for a while?
You'll understand that I'm looking for a vintage high place to get a better view.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Jul 16 2009, 02:12 PM
Post #27


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



QUOTE (climber @ Jul 16 2009, 01:31 AM) *
You'll understand that I'm looking for a vintage high place to get a better view.


millésime? sur Mars?


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Jul 16 2009, 03:38 PM
Post #28


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2921
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (ElkGroveDan @ Jul 16 2009, 04:12 PM) *
millésime? sur Mars?

...and we'll call it (Avril) Lavigne...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zeke4ther
post Jul 16 2009, 09:24 PM
Post #29


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 139
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Toronto, Canada
Member No.: 529



Ahhh....a touch of Canadian content... biggrin.gif


--------------------
-- Robin
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jul 16 2009, 09:47 PM
Post #30


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10166
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



Can't have too much of that. smile.gif

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dot.dk
post Jul 19 2009, 12:47 PM
Post #31


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 578
Joined: 5-November 04
From: Denmark
Member No.: 107



Some good news in the latest update smile.gif

http://marsrovers.nasa.gov/mission/status.html#opportunity

QUOTE
Opportunity began moving again with a 67-meter (220-foot) drive. The right-front wheel motor current showed some improvement from the actuator resting and extra mobility heating.

The rover performed another long drive on Sol 1946 (July 15, 2009), covering over 70 meters (230 feet). Again, the right front wheel currents showed continued improvement.


--------------------
"I want to make as many people as possible feel like they are part of this adventure. We are going to give everybody a sense of what exploring the surface of another world is really like"
- Steven Squyres
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ustrax
post Jul 19 2009, 09:17 PM
Post #32


Special Cookie
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2168
Joined: 6-April 05
From: Sintra | Portugal
Member No.: 228



Hey, are these marks left my Oppy's wheels? I don't remember seing this before:
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...FFP2514R1M1.JPG


--------------------
"Ride, boldly ride," The shade replied, "If you seek for Eldorado!"
Edgar Alan Poe
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fran Ontanaya
post Jul 19 2009, 11:02 PM
Post #33


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 293
Joined: 22-September 08
From: Spain
Member No.: 4350



She has done that before. The bedrock isn't very rocky.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Jul 20 2009, 06:35 AM
Post #34


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Check the navcams taken during sol 1950: http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...cam/2009-07-19/
There are a few mini-craters in sight. The one to the right (NW) was named "Alvin".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jul 20 2009, 11:48 AM
Post #35


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Not sure which crater this is... taken my eye off Oppy during all the LRO drooling, I'll be honest!... but interesting...

Attached Image


And some nice little rocks for Oppy to snuffle around in, too...

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Jul 20 2009, 04:26 PM
Post #36


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



That's Alvin. Here's a navcam mosaic made with those pictures to put it in context.
Attached Image


BTW, has anybody seen Cape St. Mary these last sols? Is it still visible?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jul 20 2009, 05:00 PM
Post #37


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4247
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



I've been watching Cape St. Mary (Beacon) in the rear view mirror. Our last definite sighting was sol 1942 navcam, though it was getting a bit hard to make out. I've marked it in this crop:
Attached Image

There've been north-pointing navcams since, but I can't make CSM out unambiguously (determining the exact azimuth might help). The lighting is bad (low contrast between sky and ground), but it may be that we're losing it due to topography. We're certainly no farther from CSM than we were at the last sightings.

The last good view was sol 1938 pancam:
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all...PGP2286L1M1.JPG

edit: this pancam view is so good (at half resolution yet), that given favourable topography we should be able to see CSM for a very long time to come, even from Endeavour (at least from the higher peaks that were visible from Victoria).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Jul 20 2009, 05:12 PM
Post #38


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



There was an "albedo pan" taken during sol 1949 but I don't know if it's already downlinked or not. We should try locating the cape in those pancams; the heading is... (checking in Google Mars) ... 16 degrees CW.

And speaking again about the mini-craters, the one to the left is "Dolphin".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jul 21 2009, 02:36 PM
Post #39


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Attached Image


Others will do better, I'm sure. I just fancied having a go smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jul 21 2009, 02:38 PM
Post #40


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



... and t'other one...

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Jul 22 2009, 01:18 AM
Post #41


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



Hmmm... how much of what looks like good flat pavement-stone rock from MRO is actually this kind of pile-up of (relatively recently-emplaced, at least recently enough not to have eroded down to flat yet) jumbled sandstone?

Hopefully, not a lot... unsure.gif

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
glennwsmith
post Jul 22 2009, 03:30 AM
Post #42


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 233
Joined: 21-April 05
Member No.: 328



Stu, very nice job on the small meteor craters. Can you imagine standing nearby when one of those babies hits?!? Any guess as to the size of the original meteorite? I'm thinking about 8 inches in diameter . . .
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Jul 22 2009, 11:10 AM
Post #43


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



I just checked the info from yestersol drive (1952) to find out that Opportunity moved 20m back on her own track. huh.gif
Not only that but also the nav/pancam images taken after-drive to plan the next one were pointed back towards the position she were on sol 1947.

Perhaps this path was not a safe one?

In another topic: the 17km mark was crossed near the end of this drive.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Jul 22 2009, 11:38 AM
Post #44


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



Going back for closer look at this perhaps?

Attached Image

From sol 1946, these images weren't downloaded until after she had driven on.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Julius
post Jul 22 2009, 01:27 PM
Post #45


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 362
Joined: 13-April 06
From: Malta
Member No.: 741



What should we call that!?looks quite big to me? smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Jul 22 2009, 01:48 PM
Post #46


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



It was named "Block Island".

01946::p2532::23::13::13::0::0::2::28::pancam_Block_Island_L234567Rall
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Floyd
post Jul 22 2009, 03:03 PM
Post #47


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 910
Joined: 4-September 06
From: Boston
Member No.: 1102



Tesheiner, would it be possible put a label for Block Island on your map (even if too small to actually see on the map image)? I'm confused as to which crater it is sitting in front of. It isn't Alvin?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jul 22 2009, 03:17 PM
Post #48


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4247
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



"Block Island" is actually a ways south of the sol 1942 location:
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all...00P1962R0M1.JPG
(And it's roughly 25 cm tall.) So that would mean some significant backtracking if that were a target. I'm baffled by this reversal.

Edit: perhaps Oppy's gotten tired of seeing her destination in the rearview mirror:
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all...NMP1760R0M1.JPG
and she's revolted! ohmy.gif wink.gif laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BrianL
post Jul 22 2009, 03:45 PM
Post #49


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 530
Joined: 21-March 06
From: Canada
Member No.: 721



Or this is a repeat of that programming glitch that made her go one way when she meant to go the other, although one would assume they got that issue sorted out.

I'm hopeful this is a sign that the Endeavour clays have become such a high-priority target that they have decided on the shorter, presumably quicker but riskier route to increase their chances of getting there before the overriding enemy that is time ultimately results in a critical system failure that will stop Oppy dead in her tracks. In other words, move from the philosophy that "south is the way to go, and IF we get to Endeavour, that's a bonus" to "we must reach Endeavour or die trying".

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Jul 22 2009, 05:02 PM
Post #50


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



No way that it would be another instance of the "glitch". The evidence is the "post-drive" mosaics because they are pointing WSW, same as the driving direction.

I would expect some news on the next status report in a few days, unless someone in the know posts some tidbits here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Julius
post Jul 22 2009, 05:04 PM
Post #51


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 362
Joined: 13-April 06
From: Malta
Member No.: 741



So now we're sailing in the north atlantic along the northeastern US COAST...watch out for JAWS next! blink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tim53
post Jul 22 2009, 06:21 PM
Post #52


Member
***

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 136
Joined: 8-August 06
Member No.: 1022



QUOTE (Floyd @ Jul 22 2009, 07:03 AM) *
Tesheiner, would it be possible put a label for Block Island on your map (even if too small to actually see on the map image)? I'm confused as to which crater it is sitting in front of. It isn't Alvin?


Block Island is visible in the HiRISE image, meaning it's fairly large, which is one reason we're going back. Other reason(s) I'll leave up to the reader! (more fun that way!)
wink.gif

-Tim.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jul 22 2009, 07:04 PM
Post #53


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4247
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



I estimate Block Island is roughly 25 cm tall by 50 cm wide (orthogonal to our line of sight). That's assuming it's sitting at the same elevation as Oppy's wheels were, and also that the horizon was level with pancam. (Probably not horrible approximations on Meridiani!)

Could someone who has the full resolution HiRISE post a full res crop showing the area of Block Island? I estimate it's about 50 metres S or SSW from the sol 1942 location.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Jul 22 2009, 07:06 PM
Post #54





Guests






QUOTE (alan @ Jul 22 2009, 12:38 PM) *
Going back for closer look at this perhaps?

Attached Image


Looks like a Land Rover stuck in the Sahara..... kind of unsure.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SFJCody
post Jul 22 2009, 07:44 PM
Post #55


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 813
Joined: 8-February 04
From: Arabia Terra
Member No.: 12



Great news! smile.gif This will take me more time to tweak my google earth map extension (it's proving trickier than i thought).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Reckless
post Jul 22 2009, 08:01 PM
Post #56


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 221
Joined: 25-March 05
Member No.: 217



Hi FredK
Here's a crop of the region I think you want.
I may be wrong, can't see the rock.
I can crop a different area if you wish.

Roy F
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tim53
post Jul 22 2009, 08:25 PM
Post #57


Member
***

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 136
Joined: 8-August 06
Member No.: 1022



Roy:

It's in there!

-Tim.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
HughFromAlice
post Jul 22 2009, 09:22 PM
Post #58


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 237
Joined: 22-December 07
From: Alice Springs, N.T. Australia
Member No.: 3989



Would someone who can see where it is please circle it and repost the pic! Can't see it. huh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tim53
post Jul 22 2009, 09:35 PM
Post #59


Member
***

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 136
Joined: 8-August 06
Member No.: 1022



QUOTE (HughFromAlice @ Jul 22 2009, 01:22 PM) *
Would someone who can see where it is please circle it and repost the pic! Can't see it. huh.gif

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jul 22 2009, 09:46 PM
Post #60


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



I can well understand why we're going to have a look. Not only does it look different to all the surrounding rock - it's also, I'd guess, the single largest rock not in a crater that Opportunity has ever seen.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SFJCody
post Jul 22 2009, 09:50 PM
Post #61


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 813
Joined: 8-February 04
From: Arabia Terra
Member No.: 12



Wow, that's a long drive back. Whatever it is that the rover team thinks this might be has got to be a lot more interesting than another iron meteorite!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Jul 22 2009, 10:22 PM
Post #62


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Thanks for pointing the rock Tim. smile.gif
Added it to the latest KML file in the route map thread.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Drkskywxlt
post Jul 23 2009, 12:28 AM
Post #63


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 293
Joined: 29-August 06
From: Columbia, MD
Member No.: 1083



Can someone summarize the reasons their taking the big west (almost northwest) turn? Is it more stable ground to drive on? Sorry if I missed this many pages back. Thanks!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jul 23 2009, 12:48 AM
Post #64


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8784
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Hmm. Well, as Doug pointed out, BI is an anomaly in its own right even on cursory examination. However, Tim is hinting that there are other less obvious reasons for the close-up exam.

It sure is dark, which to me indicates that might be a relatively recent, hefty meteorite. On the other hand, it might be an ejecta block from a fresh impact in the area...say, maybe from over near the recently-more-interesting region near Endeavour? Are you guys looking for clay early? wink.gif


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ElkGroveDan
post Jul 23 2009, 01:06 AM
Post #65


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4763
Joined: 15-March 05
From: Glendale, AZ
Member No.: 197



QUOTE (nprev @ Jul 22 2009, 04:48 PM) *
Tim is hinting that there are other less obvious reasons for the close-up exam.


Was there perhaps a tantalizing mini-TES image taken? Does it even work on Opportunity anymore?


--------------------
If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jul 23 2009, 01:22 AM
Post #66


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4247
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (ElkGroveDan @ Jul 23 2009, 02:06 AM) *
Does it even work on Opportunity anymore?


No.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Jul 23 2009, 01:28 AM
Post #67


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1044
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



QUOTE (fredk @ Jul 23 2009, 01:22 AM) *

So the attempt to clear the dusty mirror by leaving it exposed has failed?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Jul 23 2009, 02:50 AM
Post #68


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1044
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



QUOTE (glennwsmith @ Jul 22 2009, 03:30 AM) *
... Any guess as to the size of the original meteorite? I'm thinking about 8 inches in diameter . . .

Glenn, the size would depend on the meteor type and velocity. Was this a secondary? Was it at terminal velocity or faster? The link takes a lot of the effort out of 'what iffing' this question.
http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/tekton/crater_c.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
glennwsmith
post Jul 23 2009, 03:26 AM
Post #69


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 233
Joined: 21-April 05
Member No.: 328



Serpens, thanks for the link to the crater diameter calculator -- it is fascinating! And I am perhaps not so far off! A 0.2 m diameter meteor of dense rock (not iron), traveling at 45 km/sec (the upper end of the range for Mars impacts), and striking "competent rock" will create a crater 3.49 m (appx. 12 feet) in diameter.

But Block Island is even more fascinating!!! Is anyone sure that's why we've turned around?

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tim53
post Jul 23 2009, 04:19 AM
Post #70


Member
***

Group: Senior Member
Posts: 136
Joined: 8-August 06
Member No.: 1022



Doug has it. It's the biggest thing not associated with a crater that we've seen. And it's not outcrop.

-Tim.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jul 23 2009, 05:04 AM
Post #71


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8784
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Certainly reason enough. And there I was, spinning out into left field... rolleyes.gif


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
glennwsmith
post Jul 23 2009, 05:06 AM
Post #72


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 233
Joined: 21-April 05
Member No.: 328



Alan, my man! What led you to this felicitous observation? Just your own curiosity about that big black rock?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Jul 23 2009, 05:36 AM
Post #73


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



Just thought 'hey that looks interesting' when MMB downloaded the images, that and 'too bad Oppy has already driven away'


I'm also wondering if it's located far enough south for Oppy to see some of the terrain to the south that's currently hidden from view.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Jul 23 2009, 06:47 AM
Post #74


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



QUOTE (tim53 @ Jul 22 2009, 11:19 PM) *
Doug has it. It's the biggest thing not associated with a crater that we've seen. And it's not outcrop.
-Tim.

I thought there was a significantly larger "erratic" boulder observed near Erebus. Some here were surprised that that one was not more closely investigated at the time. I'm not suggesting that either was a glacial erratic, only that it was an erratic boulder on Mars.


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Burmese
post Jul 23 2009, 03:01 PM
Post #75


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 252
Joined: 27-April 05
Member No.: 365



But what took the team so long to decide to turn around and go investigate BI? Someone maybe took a second look at the downloaded images a few days after their initial evaluation and raised a big flag? Would have been interesting to be a fly on the wall during that ops meeting....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jul 23 2009, 03:04 PM
Post #76


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4247
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Thanks for the maps, guys. I now measure the distance to BI to be 66 metres from the sol 1942 location. That gives a size for the rock of about 67 cm wide by 30 cm high.

The approximate size of BI would've been known before they moved away from the 1942 location - the navcams were down and the pancams were targeted. So I'm guessing that the spectral info from the BI pancam sequence was important in the decision to go back.

Do the oldtimers here remember another time that they turned back to study a target? There's been backtracking due to mobility problems, but I don't recall anything like this.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jul 23 2009, 03:14 PM
Post #77


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4247
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (Burmese @ Jul 23 2009, 04:01 PM) *
But what took the team so long to decide to turn around and go investigate BI?

To add to my post above, the BI pancam sequence only came down late Saturday. The sol 1950 drive was Sunday. So it would make sense that they didn't turn back till 1952 if the pancam sequence was the trigger.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Jul 23 2009, 04:15 PM
Post #78


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



QUOTE (fredk @ Jul 23 2009, 10:04 AM) *
Do the oldtimers here remember another time that they turned back to study a target? There's been backtracking due to mobility problems, but I don't recall anything like this.


They turned Spirit back on sol 454 when the layering at Methuselah was spotted while Spirit was attempting to drive up Husband Hill. Spirit then spent an additional two month's there.

QUOTE
For several months, Spirit climbed a flank of Husband Hill, the tallest in the range. The slope closely matched the angle of underlying rock layers, which made the layering difficult to detect. Spirit reached an intermediate destination, dubbed "Larry's Lookout," then continued uphill and looked back. "That was the critical moment, when it all began falling into place," Squyres said. "Looking back downhill, you can see the layering, and it suddenly starts to makes sense."

http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/newsroom/pr.../20050524a.html


Methuselah:
http://marswatch.astro.cornell.edu/pancam_...selah_new2.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Jul 23 2009, 04:20 PM
Post #79


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (CosmicRocker @ Jul 23 2009, 01:47 AM) *
I thought there was a significantly larger "erratic" boulder observed near Erebus....

Is this the one?
Attached Image

From hortonheardawho
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Jul 23 2009, 04:24 PM
Post #80


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (fredk @ Jul 23 2009, 10:04 AM) *
Do the oldtimers here remember another time that they turned back to study a target?

There was talk of heading back to Erebus after leaving Victoria. At the same time, the talk was of studying cobbles out on the plain. I wonder if some on the team wished they had taken a closer look at that "erratic boulder" which looked like the Mother of All Cobbles to me.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jul 23 2009, 05:41 PM
Post #81


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4247
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (centsworth_II @ Jul 23 2009, 05:20 PM) *
Is this the one?

Thanks for finding that. That was viewed from the Olympia site. You can see from this image that it's maybe more of a rubble pile than a boulder:
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all...KCP2283L7M1.JPG
I get around 40 by 17 cm size for it, so BI is a fair bit bigger.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Jul 23 2009, 11:21 PM
Post #82


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1044
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



QUOTE (fredk @ Jul 23 2009, 04:04 PM) *
Do the oldtimers here remember another time that they turned back to study a target?


I think the only other time was for Paso Robles. But that was a short hop.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jul 24 2009, 12:12 AM
Post #83


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4247
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (serpens @ Jul 23 2009, 02:28 AM) *
So the attempt to clear the dusty mirror by leaving it exposed has failed?

That's right, so far:
QUOTE
The shroud of the Mini-TES continues to be left open on scheduled sols to allow the environment to clean putative dust contamination from the elevation mirror. No improvement in Mini-TES performance has been observed so far, but the rover has seen no wind events.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Jul 24 2009, 03:53 AM
Post #84


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4247
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (Tesheiner @ Jul 20 2009, 07:35 AM) *
There are a few mini-craters in sight. The one to the right (NW) was named "Alvin".

Could it be Alvin was a target near the crater? Here they seem to refer to that crater as "Kaiko."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Jul 24 2009, 04:15 AM
Post #85


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



QUOTE (centsworth_II @ Jul 23 2009, 10:20 AM) *
Is this the one? ...

Yeah, I guess it is; but it appeared several times larger in my memory. laugh.gif


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
glennwsmith
post Jul 24 2009, 04:24 AM
Post #86


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 233
Joined: 21-April 05
Member No.: 328



Drksywxlt, yes, the rovers have been sent on some seemingly roundabout routes to avoid bad ground, esp. since Oppy got stuck for several weeks in a sand dune. If there is one thing we have learned here at UMSF, it's that the rover team knows what it is doing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jul 24 2009, 07:01 AM
Post #87


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



I guess in the category of 'turn back to go somewhere' - the traverse of the northern rim of Victoria, only to enter at the very point we arrived must count smile.gif But there was a very good reason for that.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Jul 24 2009, 07:25 AM
Post #88


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2921
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (glennwsmith @ Jul 24 2009, 06:24 AM) *
if there is one thing we have learned here at UMSF, it's that the rover team knows what it is doing.

Yep, and that... the rovers don't wheel.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Jul 24 2009, 08:18 AM
Post #89


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



QUOTE (fredk @ Jul 24 2009, 05:53 AM) *
Could it be Alvin was a target near the crater? Here they seem to refer to that crater as "Kaiko."

Mmm, strange... huh.gif
There were two pancam shots taken at that site, the first named Alvin pointing to the crater at the NW (right) and the second named Dolphin pointing to another one at the WSW (left). Here's an MMB snapshot with the images in context.
Attached Image


01950::p2385::20::9::0::0::9::1::19::pancam_Alvin_L257
01950::p2386::20::3::0::0::3::1::7::pancam_Dolphin_L257


So, perhaps it should be named Alvin/Kaiko; both are vessels used in deep sea exploration.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Jul 24 2009, 09:55 AM
Post #90


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Another interesting note in the latest status report: "As of Sol 1952 (July 21, 2009), Opportunity's solar array energy production was 493 watt-hours with an atmospheric opacity (tau) of 0.462 and a dust factor of 0.559."

That's an almost 20% boost in energy production compared to the previous week (414 Whr). biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Jul 24 2009, 11:00 AM
Post #91


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10166
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



The crater namers forgot that they had already used the name Alvin. Check out the very first post in the Opportunity Route Map thread many years ago... So they had to re-name the crater.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Jul 24 2009, 11:10 AM
Post #92


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Thanks for the info, Phil.

Time for another map update... rolleyes.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Jul 27 2009, 01:24 PM
Post #93


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Here's our target "Block Island" in sight some 20m to the south.
We might get there in one driving sol and in position for IDD work in two more.
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SFJCody
post Jul 27 2009, 04:38 PM
Post #94


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 813
Joined: 8-February 04
From: Arabia Terra
Member No.: 12



Two foreign forms on a sand ribbed plain

One low entropy
The other high

One moves
The other still

One itinerant
The other resident

One seeks
The other found

The seeker approaches
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jul 27 2009, 04:46 PM
Post #95


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Land - well, something interesting - ho..!

Attached Image


Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BrianL
post Jul 27 2009, 08:36 PM
Post #96


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 530
Joined: 21-March 06
From: Canada
Member No.: 721



At this distance and angle, my mind is turning that object into a tiny boat being tossed about in the waves. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Bobby_*
post Jul 27 2009, 08:56 PM
Post #97





Guests






What are those Crab Fishermen from The Deadliest Catch doing here on Mars?

Are they trying to catch cobbles of crabs here? rolleyes.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
glennwsmith
post Jul 27 2009, 10:56 PM
Post #98


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 233
Joined: 21-April 05
Member No.: 328



SFJCody, your poem is clever and elegant. It calls to mind this one:


Ozymandias
Percy Bysshe Shelley

I met a traveller from an antique land
Who said: "Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert. Near them on the sand,
Half sunk, a shattered visage lies, whose frown
And wrinkled lip and sneer of cold command
Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
The hand that mocked them and the heart that fed.
And on the pedestal these words appear:
`My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings:
Look on my works, ye mighty, and despair!'
Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare,
The lone and level sands stretch far away".


Hope I am not duplicating the work of someone else who has been inspired by the Meridiani landscape to post this poem . . . (and Stu -- haven't digested your longer poem yet -- but to whom does "The hand that mocked them and the heart that fed" refer to, ie, can you diagram that sentence?)

And a related analog is, of course, the Rosetta Stone -- which is black -- and Block Island may prove to be a geological Rosetta Stone.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Enceladus75_*
post Jul 28 2009, 02:25 AM
Post #99





Guests






The latest traverse map looks puzzling. ohmy.gif Does this mean the Oppy team have now abandoned going West and will resume a route to the South?

Or is there some other reason for the U turn?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
centsworth_II
post Jul 28 2009, 03:13 AM
Post #100


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2173
Joined: 28-December 04
From: Florida, USA
Member No.: 132



QUOTE (Enceladus75 @ Jul 27 2009, 09:25 PM) *
...Or is there some other reason for the U turn?

Go back to post 43 of this thread and read on from there.

Yes, the reason is to go back for a look at the rock, Block Island.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

31 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd May 2024 - 05:43 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.