IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Cape York - The "Lakelands", Starting sol 2703
Tesheiner
post Sep 1 2011, 04:30 PM
Post #1


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Bye bye, Tisdale. It's time to move on.
Next target? Philosilicates.

-----

Edited on Sep 16 2011.

This thread is dedicated to the exploration of Cape York, starting on sol 2703 when Opportunity left the "rocky garden" and started moving towards Chester Lake.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
14 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 99)
jvandriel
post Sep 2 2011, 08:27 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2837
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



The Navcam L0 view on Sol 2703.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Sep 2 2011, 11:01 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



As soon as we move to the east edge of CY, I think the view to Endeavour's far side and the north rim will improve significantly.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mhoward
post Sep 3 2011, 01:43 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3431
Joined: 11-August 04
From: USA
Member No.: 98



Sol 2703-2704 Navcam panorama (updated)





Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Sep 3 2011, 09:05 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



I just finished reading this month's MER Report (by Salley Rayl @ TPS); a great reading with a lot of goodies, as usual. I'm copying here a reference about our next waypoint:
QUOTE
Opportunity’s next immediate destination is an outcrop on the southern brow of Cape York, located, as Nelson described it, "roughly 30 meters (98.42 feet) north of Spirit Point or the area of the southern tip of Cape York, and roughly 45 to 50 meters (131.23 to 164.04 feet) east of Tisdale 2."


QUOTE (walfy @ Sep 3 2011, 09:02 AM) *
Another type of gif animation of Tisdale 2:

A really rough surface, isn't it? Easy to understand why they didn't use the RAT on it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Sep 3 2011, 06:23 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4252
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



QUOTE (Tesheiner @ Sep 3 2011, 10:05 AM) *
I just finished reading this month's MER Report

Some good quotes about the future in that update:
QUOTE
"Cape Tribulation has an extensive exposure mineralogically of smectite, which typically forms in presence of water sitting on basalt. But it's a couple kilometers to south and the rover would have to climb an 80-meter hill, and then drive down a 25 degree slope to get to it," Arvidson explained.

QUOTE
"The plan beyond is to really look at those hills to the south – that's real mountain climbing," said Hartman. "Cape York is much more manageable, more weathered, more eroded, and there are some indications phyllosilicates are here, so we're going to sniff around here and see if we can find them, but the longer-term plan is to attack Cape Tribulation. That's going to be a whole other kettle of fish for us.”

From Squyres:
QUOTE
“Having said that, Cape Tribulation is the obvious next place to go for after we've really done our job at Cape York. So we're going to do the best that we can here. Then we're going to see what kind of a rover we've got and we're going to do the best we can with it. Are we going to Cape Tribulation or not? Don't know. I hope so. It looks pretty cool."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Sep 4 2011, 10:21 PM
Post #7


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Some goodies from today...

Attached Image


Drive direction?

Attached Image


Rather yummy-looking outcrop/ridge?

Attached Image


A(nother) beaten up breccia of a mongrel of a rock...


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mhoward
post Sep 5 2011, 02:37 AM
Post #8


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3431
Joined: 11-August 04
From: USA
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (Stu @ Sep 4 2011, 03:21 PM) *
Some goodies from today...


In order, labels are: "HBC" (whatever that means; maybe "B" is for Bedrock?), "Kirkland Lake", and "Marion".

In the second one I assume "Kirkland Lake" is the largest feature. We've seen it from the side. The triangularish rock on the left in that one must be "Trailbreaker", then, I guess. (As Tesheiner figured. Of course, keep in mind this is still partly guesswork.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Sep 5 2011, 02:58 AM
Post #9


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10190
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



To any Canadian, HBC can only mean Hudson's Bay Company... though maybe to a MER driver it means something different... did Oppy lose a hubcap?

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Sep 5 2011, 06:10 AM
Post #10





Guests






So what might these 3 plus billion year old clay deposits actually look like to Opportunity's cameras? Are they likely to be dramatically obvious or very subtle perhaps indistinguishable from their surroundings?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mhoward
post Sep 5 2011, 02:24 PM
Post #11


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3431
Joined: 11-August 04
From: USA
Member No.: 98



This may help visualize where we are: Part 1 Part 2
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Sep 5 2011, 06:08 PM
Post #12


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



QUOTE (mhoward @ Sep 5 2011, 04:24 PM) *
This may help visualize where we are: Part 1 Part 2

Definitely yes!
Looking at Tisdale 1 from this perspective I think it's almost clear it has the same "bright top" as Tisdale 2. There were some pancams of it planned to be taken thisol (2707) and I believe those shots should confirm it.

Would like to know the meaning of "HBC" too; I presume it is related to the bright patch of bedrock to the right of those three rocks. Actually, the rover moved to that area some hours ago. Map update in a minute.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Sep 5 2011, 07:45 PM
Post #13


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



Here is the HBC mosaic:





--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Sep 5 2011, 08:06 PM
Post #14


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Nice!


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mhoward
post Sep 5 2011, 08:21 PM
Post #15


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3431
Joined: 11-August 04
From: USA
Member No.: 98



Sol 2707 Navcam left right anaglyph

Position view (approximate)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jam Butty
post Sep 6 2011, 01:30 AM
Post #16


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 54
Joined: 10-August 11
Member No.: 6119



'Kirkland Lake' from the south,
pancam flicker gif, sol 2706

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marsophile
post Sep 6 2011, 03:54 PM
Post #17


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 507
Joined: 10-September 08
Member No.: 4338



QUOTE (Sunspot @ Sep 4 2011, 11:10 PM) *
So what might these 3 plus billion year old clay deposits actually look like to Opportunity's cameras? Are they likely to be dramatically obvious ...?


I'm thinking that without the mini-tes, it might be difficult to distinguish them. Now the loss of the MTES starts to hurt.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Sep 6 2011, 10:16 PM
Post #18


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Ooh, pretty view...

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Sep 8 2011, 02:57 AM
Post #19


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4252
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



I love the crazy lustre of the bedrock in the latest pancams - Chester Lake perhaps?
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...7M1.JPG?sol2709
How much information does the lustre give the geologically minded here about the rock? Can't wait to see this in colour...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vjkane
post Sep 8 2011, 03:47 AM
Post #20


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 706
Joined: 22-April 05
Member No.: 351



I think it's going to awhile before the geologists get tired of this place


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NickF
post Sep 8 2011, 04:00 AM
Post #21


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 107
Joined: 29-January 09
Member No.: 4589



fredk's "Chester Lake" L2-5-7 pancams. Others can undoubtedly do better smile.gif

Attached Image


--------------------
Protein structures and Mars fun - http://www.flickr.com/photos/nick960/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
brellis
post Sep 8 2011, 06:01 AM
Post #22


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 754
Joined: 9-February 07
Member No.: 1700



I continue to be stunned and amazed, not only at the imagery coming from Oppy, but the gorgeous processing y'alls are doing. Thank you so many times!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Sep 8 2011, 02:11 PM
Post #23


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



"Chester Lake" looks very interesting. Ridges of harder, darker rock jutting up out of lighter rock... cracks... pits... it's got it all...

Attached Image


(sharpened and colour-enhanced to bring out subtle features on the rock)

Full size version: http://roadtoendeavour.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/v2.jpg


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Sep 8 2011, 02:49 PM
Post #24


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



Some of the shiny bits do look like knobbly inclusions of a harder material, but others look like flat quadrilaterals bounded by
the surface crack patterns, as if they could be places where thin flakes of weathered surface material have recently broken away. I wonder if any of the loose flakes lying around the vicinity can be matched up shape-wise to individual shiny patches on the rock?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Sep 8 2011, 10:13 PM
Post #25


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



Chester Lake in 'false but trying' and 'stretched to within an inch' colours.




Fascinating...


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
walfy
post Sep 8 2011, 11:47 PM
Post #26


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 404
Joined: 5-January 10
Member No.: 5161



Right side of Chester Lake:

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
walfy
post Sep 9 2011, 12:00 AM
Post #27


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 404
Joined: 5-January 10
Member No.: 5161



Left side of Chester Lake:

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mhoward
post Sep 9 2011, 03:40 PM
Post #28


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3431
Joined: 11-August 04
From: USA
Member No.: 98



Sol 2710 Navcam panorama left right anaglyph
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mhoward
post Sep 9 2011, 05:18 PM
Post #29


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3431
Joined: 11-August 04
From: USA
Member No.: 98



Just for fun
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
Attached Image
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Sep 9 2011, 07:22 PM
Post #30


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



QUOTE (mhoward @ Sep 9 2011, 04:40 PM) *
Sol 2710 Navcam panorama


That's so much better than my paper version, thanks! smile.gif

And while I'm at it huge thanks to everyone for all the wonderful rockscapes and Endeavour vistas on this thread.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Sep 10 2011, 02:02 AM
Post #31


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10190
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



A circular version of mhoward's nice new panorama.

Phil

Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dilo
post Sep 10 2011, 05:23 AM
Post #32


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2492
Joined: 15-January 05
From: center Italy
Member No.: 150



Marvellous, guys! Starts to recall me Spirit Odyssey on Husband hill!


--------------------
I always think before posting! - Marco -
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Sep 10 2011, 12:08 PM
Post #33


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2837
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



Another Navcam L0 view taken on Sol 2710.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Sep 10 2011, 03:09 PM
Post #34


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4252
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Some comments on Chester Lake (and a false colour (?!) pancam view) here. "Paraphrased" from Squyres:
QUOTE
The new target should be IDD'd... it looks bright and Noachian itself... Need to build a nice story here and relate it to the Tisdales... We think there might be a coating, so we'll have to choose a target carefully and at least APXS it... Consider RAT'ing it to get into its guts...

It is something entirely new, or SOS ("Same Old Sulfates")? This is our first major Noachian target, so let's make it count.
I wonder what about it "looks Noachian"...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Matt Lenda
post Sep 10 2011, 04:12 PM
Post #35


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 98
Joined: 17-July 11
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 6066



QUOTE (fredk @ Sep 10 2011, 07:09 AM) *
Some comments on Chester Lake (and a false colour (?!) pancam view) here. "Paraphrased" from Squyres:I wonder what about it "looks Noachian"...

Had me fooled, too. I asked myself that all day.

The EOSs and SOWG meetings are particularly cryptic these days; these guys talk and head and shoulders above my comprehension!

-m
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marsophile
post Sep 10 2011, 05:50 PM
Post #36


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 507
Joined: 10-September 08
Member No.: 4338



Maybe it is the orbital images of that locality that look Noachian rather than that specific rock.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Sep 10 2011, 06:45 PM
Post #37


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10190
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



The new target is Salisbury... my home town! - I mean the one in Wiltshire, not one of the Salisburys in the colonies.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Sep 10 2011, 07:13 PM
Post #38


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Another magnifcent view...

Attached Image


Full size version here: http://twitpic.com/6iynsp/full


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Sep 11 2011, 01:22 AM
Post #39


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1045
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



QUOTE (fredk @ Sep 10 2011, 04:09 PM) *
I wonder what about it "looks Noachian"...

It looks like an impact breccia, integral to the weathered rim of a crater that pre-dated the Meridiani sediment formation. Could it be anything other than a Noachian construct?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Sep 11 2011, 09:28 AM
Post #40


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



True that, Serpens. The geomorph of this area is more complex and convoluted than we we assume or possibly can imagine. It's like standing on a small chunk of the Canadian Shield and figuring out depositional environments with a handlens and a Brunton.

Ah, the comparative simplicity of seven years on the playa may have spoilt us...

--Bill (almost giddy with anticipation over impending MI's and APXS) smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SteveM
post Sep 11 2011, 03:37 PM
Post #41


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 267
Joined: 5-February 06
Member No.: 675



Could some of you tell a non-geologist what kinds of questions the new detail we're encountering might answer. What more will we learn about the history of Mars -- besides the overly mentioned issue of water.

Steve M
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Sep 11 2011, 06:11 PM
Post #42


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10190
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



We don't know all the details, but it seems the sulfate and blueberry rocks of the plains we've just left were formed in a relatively brief period in the middle of Martian history. Water was there, and probably very salty and foul-tasting water! - not very pleasant for life. These rocks at Cape York are much older, and may have formed in very different conditions. What we hope to learn is, what were those conditions? Warm or cold? Reducing or oxidizing conditions? Acidic or alkaline? Lots of water or only a bit? Water in the ground, or melting out of overlying snow? So we would expect evidence of water, but it's the environmental conditions that are most important.

Phil


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Sep 11 2011, 08:57 PM
Post #43


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



That is it, exactly. When a rock like basalt weathers, in the presence of water, it breaks down into clay minerals (the phyllosilicates in the news) and various anions and cations ("minerals" dissolved in the water). The type of clays, and other weathering byproducts, is dependent on the ionic makeup of the water to begin with, as well as the temperature and whether the environment was oxidizing or reducing. By looking at the weathered zone on the hill, we can tell what the conditions were way back then.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Sep 11 2011, 09:29 PM
Post #44


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Thanks Bill and Phil, that's a really clear, really useful explanation of the significance of this place. Much appreciated.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ngunn
post Sep 11 2011, 10:00 PM
Post #45


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3516
Joined: 4-November 05
From: North Wales
Member No.: 542



There is the complication of deciding whether any clays that may be found were formed by weathering of the basalts before the impact or after brecciation and deposition on the crater rim. It's not an easy puzzle.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jam Butty
post Sep 12 2011, 01:05 AM
Post #46


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 54
Joined: 10-August 11
Member No.: 6119



Stoughton and Ridout,
flicker gif pancam sol 2711...

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Sep 12 2011, 08:40 AM
Post #47


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2837
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



Thanks Phil and Bill for that explanation and SteveM for the question.

Now I, as a non-geologist, understand what is going on on Mars
besides driving and taking pictures and measurements.

That is the purpose of this website, or not ?.

jan van Driel
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fran Ontanaya
post Sep 12 2011, 02:49 PM
Post #48


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 293
Joined: 22-September 08
From: Spain
Member No.: 4350



QUOTE (Stu @ Sep 12 2011, 01:30 PM) *


That pancam caught a dark embedded pebble in the lower left.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Floyd
post Sep 12 2011, 03:59 PM
Post #49


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 913
Joined: 4-September 06
From: Boston
Member No.: 1102



QUOTE (Fran Ontanaya @ Sep 12 2011, 10:49 AM) *
That pancam caught a dark embedded pebble in the lower left.


Can anyone place the background of this image. Where is it relative to Chester Lake? Is it in one of the pancam or navcam panoramas?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Sep 12 2011, 05:19 PM
Post #50


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



It's above it. The latest navcam mosaic (from sol 2710) misses the peeble by just a few cm or so but the one taken at the previous site, before the final approach to Chester Lake, catches it. I highlighted the peeble and the whole area on this partly mosaic from sol 2707.
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mhoward
post Sep 12 2011, 05:38 PM
Post #51


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3431
Joined: 11-August 04
From: USA
Member No.: 98



Actually they took a left Navcam image at the same time as the color Pancam image, and it fits in with the Sol 2710 panorama.



Full 360 degree panorama with single color image:



QuickTime VR version (5 MB)

Edit: Improved the images a bit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SteveM
post Sep 12 2011, 07:17 PM
Post #52


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 267
Joined: 5-February 06
Member No.: 675



Sorry I didn't get back earlier to thank Phil and Bill fore the helpful answers (doing some remodeling and those who've been there know what that does to free time).

Steve M
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Sep 13 2011, 10:42 AM
Post #53


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



"Brett Lake'...

Attached Image


"Larder Lake"...

Attached Image


"Kinojevis"

Attached Image


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mhoward
post Sep 13 2011, 02:03 PM
Post #54


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3431
Joined: 11-August 04
From: USA
Member No.: 98



Time once again to play where are the rocks (Sol 2710-2714). See Stu's post for names; the bottom one with the NASA logo is "Salisbury 1".
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
neo56
post Sep 14 2011, 12:00 AM
Post #55


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 815
Joined: 3-June 04
From: Brittany, France
Member No.: 79



QUOTE (Stu @ Sep 13 2011, 11:42 AM) *
"Brett Lake'...

"Larder Lake"...

"Kinojevis"


Beautiful pics Stu ! Have Opportunity reached the first phyllosilicates rocks ?


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Astro0
post Sep 15 2011, 05:02 AM
Post #56


Senior Member
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 3108
Joined: 21-December 05
From: Canberra, Australia
Member No.: 615



As there were a lot of variations on the same image of Opportunity's IDD for 9/11, it was worth moving them all to their own thread.

NB: mhoward's panoramas which included the IDD shot were not moved as they incorporated the wider view of Oppy's current location.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
charborob
post Sep 15 2011, 01:02 PM
Post #57


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1074
Joined: 21-September 07
From: Québec, Canada
Member No.: 3908



Nice pair of rocks (names?).
Attached Image

The one in front makes me think of a block of slag (just an impression, not very scientific, I know).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mhoward
post Sep 15 2011, 02:14 PM
Post #58


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3431
Joined: 11-August 04
From: USA
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (charborob @ Sep 15 2011, 07:02 AM) *
Nice pair of rocks (names?).


'Biscotasing' and 'Halliday'. Unknown which is which, but I would guess from left to right.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Phil Stooke
post Sep 15 2011, 02:49 PM
Post #59


Solar System Cartographer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 10190
Joined: 5-April 05
From: Canada
Member No.: 227



A composite of the current pan plus names. I am finding it hard to go back to sites from years ago and recover the names used at the time - even the PDS interface to names is clumsy and incomplete. I would like to encourage our merry band to continue to document names as we have been doing here.

Phil


Attached Image


--------------------
... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.

Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke
Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf
NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mhoward
post Sep 15 2011, 02:54 PM
Post #60


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3431
Joined: 11-August 04
From: USA
Member No.: 98



QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Sep 15 2011, 07:49 AM) *
A composite of the current pan plus names.


Good idea. I might have a go at that myself, later; it's kind of a relaxing hobby. If only I could easily get subframe images onto my panorama.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
neo56
post Sep 15 2011, 05:53 PM
Post #61


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 815
Joined: 3-June 04
From: Brittany, France
Member No.: 79



Biscotasing and Halliday in color, on sol 2716.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
neo56
post Sep 15 2011, 06:03 PM
Post #62


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 815
Joined: 3-June 04
From: Brittany, France
Member No.: 79



And Larder Lake, on sol 2715.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image

 


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
walfy
post Sep 15 2011, 06:49 PM
Post #63


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 404
Joined: 5-January 10
Member No.: 5161



Biscotasing rock super gif:

Attached Image

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Sunspot_*
post Sep 15 2011, 09:06 PM
Post #64





Guests






It looks like it might fall apart if you touched it.....and it kind of looks like a meatball
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jam Butty
post Sep 15 2011, 10:23 PM
Post #65


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 54
Joined: 10-August 11
Member No.: 6119



Stoughton, sol 2716 L456
Attached Image


Interesting looking light-coloured rock embedded in that block of brecia.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
monty python
post Sep 15 2011, 11:09 PM
Post #66


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 184
Joined: 2-March 06
Member No.: 692



According to Scott Maxwell's Twitter site, the IDD will brush and APXS - mossbauer the site with a grind on friday. But later says their is a lively debate on getting on with moving.

If they use the limmited resource of the grind, I bet a mossbauer is likely. And with the time that would take would a large super pan or super res shot take place in light of the not so hot tau?

Also the grinder doesn't have many grinds left. If it quits could you use a turning wheel with the rover in place like they did early in the mission to partly decrust rock -without hurting the wheel or contaminating the rock with wheel stuff?

Monty.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Matt Lenda
post Sep 16 2011, 02:33 AM
Post #67


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 98
Joined: 17-July 11
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 6066



QUOTE (monty python @ Sep 15 2011, 03:09 PM) *
According to Scott Maxwell's Twitter site, the IDD will brush and APXS - mossbauer the site with a grind on friday. But later says their is a lively debate on getting on with moving.

If they use the limmited resource of the grind, I bet a mossbauer is likely. And with the time that would take would a large super pan or super res shot take place in light of the not so hot tau?
Tau seems to have been down the last few sols. A Pancam 10x1 is currently in the process of being taken over several sols, though I don't think it's a superres.

QUOTE
Also the grinder doesn't have many grinds left. If it quits could you use a turning wheel with the rover in place like they did early in the mission to partly decrust rock -without hurting the wheel or contaminating the rock with wheel stuff?

Monty.

I very much doubt we would risk that. We are extra cautious when it comes to using our wheels! Though the RAT seems to be in great health anyways, limited grinds notwithstanding.

-m
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NickF
post Sep 16 2011, 02:43 AM
Post #68


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 107
Joined: 29-January 09
Member No.: 4589



My interpretation of the 'Larder Lake' L2/5/7 pancam images, Sol 2715.

Attached Image




--------------------
Protein structures and Mars fun - http://www.flickr.com/photos/nick960/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Tesheiner
post Sep 16 2011, 06:37 AM
Post #69


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 4279
Joined: 19-April 05
From: .br at .es
Member No.: 253



Ok, just finished splitting the "Cape York" thread. This new one starts with the approach to Chester Lake (and the Lakelands) and should be the current one 'til they finish sniffing and exploring this area. All posts related to Tisdale, Odyssey and previous sites should be posted on the other proper threads.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Sep 16 2011, 08:54 AM
Post #70


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2837
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



Nice Pancam view on Sol 2715.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jamescanvin
post Sep 16 2011, 09:02 AM
Post #71


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2262
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Melbourne - Oz
Member No.: 16



That is the start of the Endeavour pan. Those 5 will be joined by 10 more tomorrowsol, and hopefully more next week. All in L257 colour. smile.gif


--------------------
Twitter
Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Sep 16 2011, 02:37 PM
Post #72


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



This is strange.

Over the last couple of weeks I've had serious problems trying to get the MI's to match up with the Pancams for location images. Today I think I found out why.

One of the oddities of the way MI's are presented is that the images are inverted compared to the "normal" Pancam (and other cameras) view. No problem, as standard procedure I invert the MI's after download so that they match the orientation of the Pancam images. Today I was attempting to match the latest MI's with the latest Pancams and I saw that the MI's are now being transferred in the same "correct" orientation as the Pancam images.

Has anyone else noticed this? I need to go back and check the past few week's MI's, and check also at Hortonheardawho's Flicker site (who frequently makes MI location charts).

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Sep 16 2011, 03:11 PM
Post #73


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14433
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Remember - the MI could be oriented different way depending on where the IDD is placed. This isn't a post-production issue, so to speak.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NickF
post Sep 17 2011, 02:36 AM
Post #74


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 107
Joined: 29-January 09
Member No.: 4589



Another part of the Endeavour L2/5/7 pan, sol 2715.

Attached Image



--------------------
Protein structures and Mars fun - http://www.flickr.com/photos/nick960/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
brellis
post Sep 17 2011, 05:48 AM
Post #75


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 754
Joined: 9-February 07
Member No.: 1700



NickF -- that's quite a tilt in your sol 2715 post. Are we already looking at hills in the distance?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Sep 17 2011, 08:37 AM
Post #76


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Back from battling Daleks in London to find...

Attached Image


ohmy.gif ohmy.gif ohmy.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Sep 17 2011, 11:21 AM
Post #77


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2837
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



The Panoramic L2 view of Endeavour Crater.
Taken on Sol 2715.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
brellis
post Sep 17 2011, 01:29 PM
Post #78


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 754
Joined: 9-February 07
Member No.: 1700



Beautiful Pan von Jan! Now I understand the tilted perspective in NickF's clip.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
NickF
post Sep 17 2011, 01:42 PM
Post #79


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 107
Joined: 29-January 09
Member No.: 4589



QUOTE (brellis @ Sep 17 2011, 07:29 AM) *
Beautiful Pan von Jan! Now I understand the tilted perspective in NickF's clip.


Indeed, the rover is on a c. 10 degree slope at the moment.
Here's the straightened version of my previous composite.

Attached Image


--------------------
Protein structures and Mars fun - http://www.flickr.com/photos/nick960/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Sep 17 2011, 02:28 PM
Post #80


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4252
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



The numbers we've seen indicate tau has dropped a fair bit in the last month or so, but with these new pancams we can directly see how much the transparency has improved in the last few weeks. Compare these frames from 2679 and 2718 looking across to Iazu:
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all...00P2384L2M1.JPG
http://qt.exploratorium.edu/mars/opportuni...2M1.JPG?sol2718
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mhoward
post Sep 17 2011, 03:35 PM
Post #81


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 3431
Joined: 11-August 04
From: USA
Member No.: 98



According to the database it's the "Endeavour 1" mosaic, parts 1 and 2. Once it's down, the L257 color version should be really something. The color parts we've seen are already amazing. Lot of work to put it all together, though.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Sep 17 2011, 05:09 PM
Post #82


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4252
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



Thanks for the stitches, guys - this is a stunning view. Lots of colour variation too - the L2's are showing very different details than the L7's.

Here's a long baseline anaglyph from sols 2679 and 2718. The lighting is pretty different between the frames, and the stereo effect is pretty extreme for Solander point, so this may be one for the hard-core anaglyphers out there. Some nice structure on the inner slope of Tribulation, though.
Attached Image

Here's a cross-eyed version for those using stereo photo maker or the like:
Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Matt Lenda
post Sep 17 2011, 05:18 PM
Post #83


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 98
Joined: 17-July 11
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 6066



Heads up for a RAT hole sometime tonight!

-m
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
eoincampbell
post Sep 18 2011, 01:58 AM
Post #84


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 399
Joined: 28-August 07
From: San Francisco
Member No.: 3511



Thanks to everyone for stitching the latest thrilling pan... what an amazing place this is...


--------------------
'She drove until the wheels fell off...'
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Sep 18 2011, 11:19 AM
Post #85


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2837
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



If you want a new background on your computerscreen
here is the one.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Juramike
post Sep 18 2011, 12:16 PM
Post #86


Senior Member
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 2785
Joined: 10-November 06
From: Pasadena, CA
Member No.: 1345



"Just wait for me in the car while I go run up that hill for a sec..."


--------------------
Some higher resolution images available at my photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/31678681@N07/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bill Harris
post Sep 18 2011, 06:42 PM
Post #87


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2998
Joined: 30-October 04
Member No.: 105



Nice preliminary RAT MI's this morning, and I was able to get things straightened out and produce a couple of IDD location images




http://i142.photobucket.com/albums/r91/wil...L2M1--annot.jpg

Other images at the P'bucket site linked below.

--Bill


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Eutectic
post Sep 19 2011, 12:03 AM
Post #88


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 52
Joined: 1-March 11
From: Houston, USA
Member No.: 5860



Post-RAT imagery.

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Zeke4ther
post Sep 19 2011, 01:07 AM
Post #89


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 139
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Toronto, Canada
Member No.: 529



Wow! That rock was awfully soft...look at all of the powder.


--------------------
-- Robin
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Sep 19 2011, 02:15 AM
Post #90


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



I'm glad the old girl wasn't given anything too difficult to chew smile.gif


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Greg Hullender
post Sep 19 2011, 02:39 AM
Post #91


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1018
Joined: 29-November 05
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Member No.: 590



Is there a nice summary somewhere of what instruments are still working and what sort of science Opportunity is still able to do? Obviously the pictures alone are still spectacular, but I'm wondering what else is still working.

--Greg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Sep 19 2011, 02:45 AM
Post #92


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14433
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



Pancam - Fine, and less dusty than it has been
MiniTES - Bust

IDD - Azimuth joint bust - can position instrument along a vertical plane, not full 3D space.
APXS - Fine
MI - Fine
RAT - Fine ( but obviously, teeth are consumed to near death )
Mossbauer - VERY VERY tired. We're > 10 half-lives into it - so integrations that would have taken 6 hrs could technically take > 6 months. A good integration now would involved several weeks.




Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Sep 19 2011, 02:52 AM
Post #93


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



I can't help but think that if I were the MER team I'd aim for a likely looking rock in early November, do some documentation, put out the Moessbauer, and take a nice long Thanksgiving & Christmas holiday while it integrates!


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fredk
post Sep 19 2011, 03:37 AM
Post #94


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4252
Joined: 17-January 05
Member No.: 152



From Lenda's blog:
QUOTE
Squyres put down a lien to get a super-resolution panorama of the entirety of Endeavour Crater, and it has taken the better part of a week to get it all done.

Super res?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CosmicRocker
post Sep 19 2011, 04:01 AM
Post #95


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2228
Joined: 1-December 04
From: Marble Falls, Texas, USA
Member No.: 116



That rock was incredibly soft. I wasn't expecting that. In retrospect, perhaps I should have expected it. The outcrop is worn down just as flat as the surrounding Meridiani sandstones, so why wouldn't we expect it to be soft?


--------------------
...Tom

I'm not a Space Fan, I'm a Space Exploration Enthusiast.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Sep 19 2011, 05:23 AM
Post #96


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1585
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



QUOTE (djellison @ Sep 18 2011, 09:45 PM) *
MiniTES - Bust


Or dust. Depends on how you see it. They do gamely keep checking it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
marsophile
post Sep 19 2011, 05:59 AM
Post #97


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 507
Joined: 10-September 08
Member No.: 4338



QUOTE (CosmicRocker @ Sep 18 2011, 09:01 PM) *
That rock was incredibly soft.


Does that mean it is not basaltic?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Sep 19 2011, 06:30 AM
Post #98


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14433
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



QUOTE (stevesliva @ Sep 18 2011, 10:23 PM) *
Or dust. Depends on how you see it. They do gamely keep checking it.


Check the documentation for the MER Analysts Notebook.

For example - Sol 2261-2267 MER B Downlink Report
QUOTE
Opportunity is healthy and all* subsystems are nominal as of the Sol 2267 UHF downlink. Energy is currently 296 Whr with Tau at 0.370 and a dust factor of 0.5820 as of Sol 2267.

*except the Mini-Thermal Emission Spectrometer (MTES) which has experienced a failure. Investigations into the Mini-TES failure are ongoing.


or
Sol 2281-2287 MER B Downlink Report
QUOTE
[Mini-TES, the miniature Thermal Emission Spectrometer experienced an anomaly on Sol 2257 which is currently being investigated.]


later, you will just find

QUOTE
*with the exception of a known problem with Mini-TES as of the Sol 2308 downlink.



Or from the excellent : http://www.planetary.org/news/2011/0901_Ma...ver_Update.html

QUOTE
Last Sunday, the rover's Sol 2700, the team decided to have the rover conduct another set of diagnostics on the miniature thermal emission spectrometer (Mini-TES) that began acting up last year and hasn't been working since. "We’re all about trying to exhaust even remotely likely possibilities," noted Nelson. Opportunity followed her commands to exercise the back-up laser and back-up optical switch.



Or going back further in time
http://www.planetary.org/news/2011/0430_Ma...ate_Spirit.html

QUOTE
Last year, after being turned on, the Mini-TES failed to conduct a transferring kind of "handshake" with the PMA. "It timed out, and then said it wasn't talking to the flight software, and it was also not properly commanding the motors that would have changed the PMA azimuth, and we got a PMA fault," Nelson recounted. The ensuing diagnostics indicated the PMA azimuth motor is fine, and the issue is likely between the Mini-TES and the motor control board.

This month, the Mini-TES exhibited more anomalous behavior. Specifically, it failed to draw power. A functioning Mini-TES should draw 200-250 milliamperes up to about ¼ amp, according to Nelson. "We're not seeing that current draw," he said.

That would seem to suggest that the Mini-TES is simply not turning on, or that something somewhere between the instrument and motor control board has failed. Although the instrument investigation is continuing, the Mini-TES remains, Nelson said, "effectively out of commission."


It is, as I said.... bust.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
serpens
post Sep 19 2011, 07:40 AM
Post #99


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1045
Joined: 17-February 09
Member No.: 4605



QUOTE (CosmicRocker @ Sep 19 2011, 05:01 AM) *
..... The outcrop is worn down just as flat as the surrounding Meridiani sandstones, so why wouldn't we expect it to be soft?



Indeed. Remember Clovis rock - a Spirit RAT in 2004 - image below? Looks a bit softer than Opportunity's last grind. But this is a breccia, probably suevite and the weathering susceptibilities of the constituent elements are different to the Moh's scale resistance to abrasion.

http://marsrover.nasa.gov/gallery/press/sp...o-A223R1_br.jpg
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jvandriel
post Sep 19 2011, 09:40 AM
Post #100


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2837
Joined: 22-April 05
From: Ridderkerk, Netherlands
Member No.: 353



Mi cam Sol 2719.

Jan van Driel

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

14 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 8th June 2024 - 06:43 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.