Destination Uranus! Rare chance to reach ice giants excites scientists |
Destination Uranus! Rare chance to reach ice giants excites scientists |
Mar 8 2020, 11:47 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 7 Joined: 17-March 16 Member No.: 7915 |
News article in Nature about an upcoming launch window in the 2030s for Uranus and Neptune (no paywall):
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-00619-y |
|
|
Mar 9 2020, 03:50 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 15 Joined: 26-March 12 From: San Antonio, Texas Member No.: 6368 |
This will be so AWESOME, if it does happen. Would be the icing on the cake after Pluto and New Horizons. I hope I'm alive to see this, as I just turned 53 this past January.
James -------------------- Axes Grind and Maces Clash!
|
|
|
Mar 13 2020, 05:07 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 708 Joined: 1-April 08 From: Minnesota ! Member No.: 4081 |
Not sure if the abstracts from this Royal Society scientific meeting on Future Exploration of the Ice Giants were referenced in other posts on Unmanned Spaceflight. If not here is the link: https://royalsociety.org/science-events-and.../01/ice-giants/
|
|
|
Mar 13 2020, 05:55 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1592 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
The current 'Outer Planets' SNAFU is really tempering my enthusiasm here:
https://www.planetary.org/blogs/casey-dreie...ry-science.html And I'll leave it at that for the longstanding pro-harmony reasons of this forum, but I just want the few readers here to be aware. |
|
|
Mar 14 2020, 04:19 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 715 Joined: 22-April 05 Member No.: 351 |
The current 'Outer Planets' SNAFU is really tempering my enthusiasm here: https://www.planetary.org/blogs/casey-dreie...ry-science.html And I'll leave it at that for the longstanding pro-harmony reasons of this forum, but I just want the few readers here to be aware. Both the John Hopkins Applied Physics Lab and JPL are working to define New Frontiers-class Uranus orbiters. The abstracts don't mention whether or not an atmospheric probe could be included. The key is the attempt to drastically reduce the orbiter cost. APL concept JPL concept -------------------- |
|
|
Mar 19 2020, 01:06 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 316 Joined: 1-October 06 Member No.: 1206 |
Has anyone proposed a flyby plus probe combination? Just asking.
P |
|
|
Mar 19 2020, 05:38 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 715 Joined: 22-April 05 Member No.: 351 |
Has anyone proposed a flyby plus probe combination? Just asking. P Just flybys or flybys + atmospheric probes have been proposed a number of times. The consensus has been that the value of a flyby given its cost (generally assumed to be >$1B) isn't justified; better to wait for the funds for a much productive orbiter mission ($2-3B). Imagine how little we would have learned about the Saturn system if Cassini had been a flyby mission. That said, the idea keeps coming up. By carefully subsetting the scientific goals, one could imagine a less expensive flyby mission that could be substantially cheaper. Trident, for example, made it to the Discovery finalist list by focusing its goals only on a single Trident flyby (although I'm sure there would be some ancillary Neptune observations). -------------------- |
|
|
Mar 21 2020, 05:43 AM
Post
#8
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 316 Joined: 1-October 06 Member No.: 1206 |
vjkane, I'm not suggesting its an ideal outcome, just one that might fall into the class of the good being the enemy of the perfect.
We might not get flagship class ice giant missions in any of our lifetimes. I expect some advance in ice giant science when the next generation of really big ground based telescopes come online, but apart from that I was wondering what might be done with a New Horizons type package, with a magnetometer, with or without a probe. Are there flight spares that could be used? Might this fit into a New Frontiers budget? And might there be opportunities for post ice giant flybys of TNOs? P |
|
|
Mar 21 2020, 03:36 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 715 Joined: 22-April 05 Member No.: 351 |
vjkane, I'm not suggesting its an ideal outcome, just one that might fall into the class of the good being the enemy of the perfect. We might not get flagship class ice giant missions in any of our lifetimes. I expect some advance in ice giant science when the next generation of really big ground based telescopes come online, but apart from that I was wondering what might be done with a New Horizons type package, with a magnetometer, with or without a probe. Are there flight spares that could be used? Might this fit into a New Frontiers budget? And might there be opportunities for post ice giant flybys of TNOs? P I completely understand that reasoning. The planetary community also understands that if the Mars sample return goes forward, then affording a flagship Ice Giant mission will be difficult. JHU/APL and JPL are both working on mission concepts for New Frontiers-class Uranus orbiters. Here are links to two abstracts for the LPSC 2020 conference: APL abstract JPL abstract While there's not a lot of detail in these, likely strategies would be to reduce the scope of science, fly fewer and simpler instruments than a flagship mission, and reduce data rates. The latter probably would be a key driver for lowering costs; data return is often the largest use of power on a mission (per one of Ralph Lorenz' papers). Reducing power ripples through the spacecraft design. I wouldn't be surprised if these concepts would have the spacecraft stay in long elliptical orbits so that there's plenty of time between close encounters to return data at a lower rate. If an NF-class Uranus orbiter looks feasible, that would give the Decadal Survey more options to look at for ice giant missions. I suspect that a Neptune NF-class orbiter isn't feasible. Longer flight time, further away so more power is needed to return the same amount of data, the craft has to fly fast to get to Neptune in a reasonable time so decelerating to enter orbiter may require something like aerocapture. A couple of years ago, a portion of the outer planet community was recommending a combination of a Neptune flagship mission combined with a Uranus flyby+atmospheric probe that could continue to a KBO flyby. In looking at reduced cost ice giant missions, one question always is, is there enough science returned to make this lower cost mission a better choice than spending the same money on a mission to a nearer target? -------------------- |
|
|
Mar 21 2020, 11:15 PM
Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2106 Joined: 13-February 10 From: Ontario Member No.: 5221 |
Neptune and Triton are so tempting (the geysers alone would be such a treat), but if we have to choose just one, a Uranus orbiter is the logical choice after Galileo and Cassini. Shorter flight time and many more moons with unmapped hemispheres, and a chance to dispense with the 'blue-green cue ball' image that has existed since 1986. The equinox when both hemispheres are illuminated is approaching as well.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th September 2024 - 03:09 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |