New push for space nuclear power, Call for Discovery proposals using advanced RTGs |
New push for space nuclear power, Call for Discovery proposals using advanced RTGs |
Sep 30 2007, 12:32 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 22 Joined: 3-January 07 Member No.: 1551 |
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewnews.html?id=1237
reprints an interesting Aviation Week article suggesting a push for proposals for new Discovery-sized missions to use closed-loop Stirling cycle nuclear power systems, aiming for launch around 2013. It's unclear how the shortage of 238Pu is being resolved, though the Stirling-cycle devices use two 250W_thermal units of 238Pu for 143W output, whilst the Cassini/New Horizons RTG uses eighteen units for 285W electrical output. http://nspires.nasaprs.com/external/viewre...ationDocument=1 is a summary of the specs of the Advanced Stirling Radioisotope Generator; http://esto.nasa.gov/conferences/nstc2007/...ations/D2P1.pdf is quite a nice presentation of the technology development. The engineering history seems to be by way of Stirling-type cryocoolers, of which ten have been running for more than 10k hours each. |
|
|
Oct 1 2007, 07:00 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 279 Joined: 19-August 07 Member No.: 3299 |
Good improvement in RPS System efficiency between the RTG powered by Cassini Spacecraft and the present model ASRG: 6.35% versus over 30%. However, the electric output power (Watts) versus weight has improved by 67% (285 Watts for 56 kg -5.09 W/kg versus 160 Watts (estimate) for 19 kgs (estimate) -8.5 W/kg).
The probably future spacecraft: Titan Explorer, REP(?) & Europe Geophysical Explorer will be powerd by ASRG. |
|
|
Oct 2 2007, 12:48 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 656 Joined: 20-April 05 From: League City, Texas Member No.: 285 |
|
|
|
Oct 2 2007, 02:19 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 213 Joined: 21-January 07 From: Wigan, England Member No.: 1638 |
Seems like the Russians ought to have plenty of plutonium lying about which they'd be happy to sell to a legitimate buyer - or is there some rule prohibiting Nasa from buying Pu from foreign nations? NASA has bought 238Pu from Russia for years (or at least, the Department of Energy does so on its behalf). -------------------- "I got a call from NASA Headquarters wanting a color picture of Venus. I said, “What color would you like it?” - Laurance R. Doyle, former JPL image processing guy
|
|
|
Oct 4 2007, 08:32 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 715 Joined: 22-April 05 Member No.: 351 |
I am worried about how many new non-Mars missions this technology will allow. I've just been reviewing the Juno website, and it is about as simple of an outer planets mission as possible, and it required the New Frontiers level of funding. (One possible caveat: Perhaps the costs of the instruments drives the mission, rather than the need to reach and operate beyond Mars). Will cheap, low wattage (~250 w) nuclear power really enable new types of missions?
I have no doubt that this will be very useful at Mars for long-lived geophysical (seismology and weather) stations and for small rovers. But the cost of Juno suggests that the lack of RTGs is not what is eliminating outer planet missions from Discovery. -------------------- |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd September 2024 - 09:45 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |