STS-124, Kibo to the ISS |
STS-124, Kibo to the ISS |
May 31 2008, 02:33 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 809 Joined: 11-March 04 Member No.: 56 |
Discovery is currently being fueled on pad 39A.
|
|
|
May 31 2008, 03:42 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 147 Joined: 14-April 06 From: Berlin Member No.: 744 |
I've just read the press kit for STS-124 and it turns out that out of the 7 people going up, 5 are going into space for the very first time, with the other 2 having flown once and twice respectively - the commander has flown earlier twice as a pilot, and Mission Specialist-3 has flown once before. Also, the fuel tank used in this mission is the first redesigned version actually used after return to flight. The tanks used previously were fitted with modifications in the post-production process.
-------------------- |
|
|
May 31 2008, 04:17 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 311 Joined: 31-August 05 From: Florida & Texas, USA Member No.: 482 |
Looks like they've saved the best module for last; Kibo's the largest and has compartments for exposing experiments to space. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/...ements/jem.html The weather looks great too; clear skies and not too windy. |
|
|
May 31 2008, 04:23 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Where can one find the ground track map for launch? It appears it should pass right overhead for me so I thought about going out for a look.
-------------------- |
|
|
May 31 2008, 05:12 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 147 Joined: 14-April 06 From: Berlin Member No.: 744 |
Where can one find the ground track map for launch? It appears it should pass right overhead for me so I thought about going out for a look. Hi ugordan, Try: http://heavens-above.com/?Loc=Zagreb&L...=131&TZ=CET After it launches. I have been using this service since 1999 and it is perfect not only for the shuttle but also for observing the ISS and other satellites. -------------------- |
|
|
May 31 2008, 05:19 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Thanks, karolp. I use Heavens Above for ISS flyovers, but I wasn't sure how quickly STS orbits are input there.
-------------------- |
|
|
May 31 2008, 05:45 PM
Post
#7
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 147 Joined: 14-April 06 From: Berlin Member No.: 744 |
The orbit of Discovery is going to be very similar to that of the ISS since they are going to dock eventually :-) Therefore, even if the parameters are not there on time, assuming a flyover pattern similar to the station would be a pretty good guess.
-------------------- |
|
|
May 31 2008, 06:06 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Yes, but while ISS orbit is fixed in inertial space (more or less), its ground track is not. Earth is rotating underneath and two objects sharing same the same orbit with one trailing in its orbit will have different groundtracks. How much different depends on how long it takes for the trailing one to cross the separation.
-------------------- |
|
|
May 31 2008, 06:17 PM
Post
#9
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
This is not entirely what you were asking for, but this is what I use when looking for overflights of STS/ISS:
LINK Just plug in your location and voila! (I'm not sure if this map will include the shuttle or not once it launches) -------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Guest_Zvezdichko_* |
May 31 2008, 06:26 PM
Post
#10
|
Guests |
Hmm... how are they going to relocate the logistic module? It's currently attached to Harmony, but in the final configuration it has to be attached to the main Kibo module. As far as I see, there are only three EVAs planned
|
|
|
May 31 2008, 06:29 PM
Post
#11
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 290 Joined: 26-March 04 From: Edam, The Netherlands Member No.: 65 |
I have been searching the web for typical trajectories of the space shuttle for a long time now.
Anyone knows where to find graphs showing height, downrange distance, speed, acceleration, weight, etc. in time during launch (until orbit insertion) ? |
|
|
May 31 2008, 06:46 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
Hmm... how are they going to relocate the logistic module? It's currently attached to Harmony, but in the final configuration it has to be attached to the main Kibo module. As far as I see, there are only three EVAs planned I don't recall the exact timelines, but the logistics module will be closed up and relocated to its final location using the station's robotic arm. I am not sure if the EVA'ers will have to assist much with that task. Marcel, I'm sure such documentation exists somewhere, but I don't know where you might find it. The commentators on NASA TV do read off that info during their coverage of launch, though. -------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Guest_Zvezdichko_* |
May 31 2008, 06:56 PM
Post
#13
|
Guests |
Thank you. I suppose thy will just attach the arm to the module.
|
|
|
May 31 2008, 09:27 PM
Post
#14
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
WOW!!!!!!!!! Just saw the orbiter and ET flying in formation thru the sky over kendal... ET very distinctive orange colour, orbiter blue-white, less than a degree apart... sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet ;-)
-------------------- |
|
|
May 31 2008, 09:27 PM
Post
#15
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
Successful launch!
-------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Guest_Zvezdichko_* |
May 31 2008, 09:32 PM
Post
#16
|
Guests |
I saw a lot of debris falling away. Hope nothing struck the orbiter.
|
|
|
May 31 2008, 09:36 PM
Post
#17
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 548 Joined: 19-March 05 From: Princeton, NJ, USA Member No.: 212 |
beautiful launch
a small piece of foam did strike the underbelly of the shuttle shortly after SRB sep. clearly visible via the camera on the ET. did not appear to strike the RCC panels on the wing leading edge this is likely after the period of much concern, but will be an area of close, detailed investigation during the crew inspection |
|
|
May 31 2008, 09:58 PM
Post
#18
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1583 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
this is likely after the period of much concern, but will be an area of close, detailed investigation during the crew inspection Incidentally, they'll have to wait until they pick the boom system up at the station-- it wouldn't fit in the bay with Kibo. It's too bad there will likely be more concern on this launch. |
|
|
May 31 2008, 10:21 PM
Post
#19
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 548 Joined: 19-March 05 From: Princeton, NJ, USA Member No.: 212 |
At a NASA press conference on going at this moment, Bill Gerstenmaier just said "the foam strike is not of much concern". But off course they will check it throughly after picking up the OBSS at the ISS, during the back flip, etc
|
|
|
Jun 1 2008, 05:21 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
TPS inspections are complete for today. They're having to make do without the OBSS (the sensor boom) for this inspection due to the size of Kibo.
Tomorrow we dock! -------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 2 2008, 04:10 PM
Post
#21
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Jun 2 2008, 04:52 PM
Post
#22
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
Discovery approaching ISS right now... gorgeous pix on NASA TV...
http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/nasa/index.html -------------------- |
|
|
Jun 2 2008, 05:06 PM
Post
#23
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1887 Joined: 20-November 04 From: Iowa Member No.: 110 |
I notice the solar panels are still aligned differently on opposite ends of the station.
Anyone know when that is planned to be fixed? |
|
|
Jun 2 2008, 05:38 PM
Post
#24
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
I notice the solar panels are still aligned differently on opposite ends of the station. Anyone know when that is planned to be fixed? This is done on purpose to protect the arrays from docking and undocking vehicles. The Russian vehicles have their arrays 'feathered' as well right now, as are some of the radiators. The overall SARJ issue (the massive joint that rotates the starboard array) has not yet been resolved, though. There will be an attempt to clean the joint during this docked mission, and work will continue beyond that throughout the year. -------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 2 2008, 05:47 PM
Post
#25
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
Discovery is within 150 feet of docking. They are in an orbital night right now, but the features within the payload bay can be made out.
-------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 2 2008, 06:05 PM
Post
#26
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
-------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 2 2008, 07:42 PM
Post
#27
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
-------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 02:32 PM
Post
#28
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
Today is the mission's first EVA. Tasks on hand:
This EVA is scheduled to start in about an hour, and scheduled to last 6 1/2 hours. -------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 04:22 PM
Post
#29
|
||||
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 10 Joined: 17-November 07 From: in a IA corn field Member No.: 3963 |
Has anyone else seen this article?
http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/08060...39a-damage.html or seen anymore pictures of the damage? Of all the launches I have seen I have never seen damage to the pad like this. Could it just be the aging pad or was it the fact they were taking the larges element to the station? Would they have needed more power at liftoff because of Kibo's weight? |
|||
|
||||
Jun 3 2008, 04:26 PM
Post
#30
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
They're trying to figure it out as we speak. The structure was old, initially built in the 60's. And Kibo is certainly a heavier payload, but not the heaviest payload even since return to flight.
But yeah, your assessment is pretty much the same as those close to the program. Never seen such damage before. (edited to remove quote) -------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 04:28 PM
Post
#31
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
EVA #1 has begun, just shy of one hour late. This spacewalk was delayed by a communications issue with one of the suits.
-------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 05:14 PM
Post
#32
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 10 Joined: 17-November 07 From: in a IA corn field Member No.: 3963 |
|
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 07:21 PM
Post
#33
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
I have no idea if this contributed to the pad damage, but I thought it quite noticeable that Discovery's rise off the pad was significantly slower than I'm used to seeing for a shuttle. I attributed it to the weight of Kibo, which IIRC is one of the heaviest payloads the shuttle has ever carried.
Could a fractional increase in the time it took for the stack to clear the pad have added enough stress to the flame diversion pits and the entire pad structure that damage you wouldn't have seen after a "regular" launch was caused by this one? The flame trench, after all, has stood up to eleven Saturn V launches and countless (nearing 100) shuttle launches. Is it merely age and wear that finally got to it this time, I wonder, or a slightly more stressful launch sequence? -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 07:39 PM
Post
#34
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
It didn't look that much slower to me. The Saturns took forever to get off the pad on the other hand. I'd say this is just age doing its thing.
-------------------- |
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 08:53 PM
Post
#35
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8784 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
I agree. Aging infrastructure problems rear their ugly head again. Whatever sort of mortar or adhesive that held the bricks together looks like it finally gave up the ghost.
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Jun 3 2008, 10:10 PM
Post
#36
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 183 Joined: 22-October 05 From: Cape Canaveral, FL Member No.: 534 |
The difference between a 32,000 lbs module or even having an empty payload bay has little effect on 7.5 million lbs of thrust.
This was not even the heaviest ISS piece taken up by the shuttle, remember. -------------------- |
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 01:10 AM
Post
#37
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1281 Joined: 18-December 04 From: San Diego, CA Member No.: 124 |
The Saturns took forever to get off the pad on the other hand. And looked so much the more awesome for it -------------------- Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!" Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test |
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 05:28 AM
Post
#38
|
||
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
NASA TV currently showing some very cool footage of Kibo being unberthed from Discovery...
(Don't know if it's live or not; I just got up and that's what they're showing...) Edit: ah. Obviously not live as they're now showing something else. Oh well, still great pics -------------------- |
|
|
||
Jun 4 2008, 01:41 PM
Post
#39
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
That was from the 'flight day highlights' video package they air during the crew's sleep period, and showed part of the installation of Kibo. Today we get our first peek inside.
-------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 01:47 PM
Post
#40
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 753 Joined: 23-October 04 From: Greensboro, NC USA Member No.: 103 |
OK, I have to say something about Karen Nyberg's hair. As a red-blooded male, I'm 100% in favor of long blonde hair, but hers looks kinda dangerous floating around in microgravity! I have seen Dr. Nyberg tie her hair back or put it up on a few of the inflight videos, but I'm watching it float all over the place again this morning. Wouldn't you think that would create some horrendous tangles? I remember that Judith Resnick's hair actually got caught in the IMAX camera on an early Shuttle mission.
OK, got that out of my system. -------------------- Jonathan Ward
Manning the LCC at http://www.apollolaunchcontrol.com |
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 02:54 PM
Post
#41
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1281 Joined: 18-December 04 From: San Diego, CA Member No.: 124 |
Well, no one beats Sunita for long locks....
Would she be a member of the Luxuriant Flowing Hair Club for Scientists? -------------------- Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!" Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test |
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 03:59 PM
Post
#42
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
Installation of the air pump into the station toilet is complete, and after several test runs appears to be working just fine now.
-------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 04:55 PM
Post
#43
|
|
Forum Contributor Group: Members Posts: 1372 Joined: 8-February 04 From: North East Florida, USA. Member No.: 11 |
|
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 05:11 PM
Post
#44
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
The difference between a 32,000 lbs module or even having an empty payload bay has little effect on 7.5 million lbs of thrust. This was not even the heaviest ISS piece taken up by the shuttle, remember. True, this was not the heaviest Shuttle to launch. If I'm remembering correctly, the heaviest stack at liftoff wasn't even an ISS msission -- that honor goes to the flight that launched Hubble. Again, IIRC. However, um... I thought the Shuttle stack generated a total of about 6.5 million lbs of thrust (or whateve the heck that is in Newtons) at liftoff, roughly 2.5 million per SRB and a total of 1.5 million for the three SSMEs. The Saturn V developed a design spec of 7.5 million, and with the F-1 engines uprated slightly (higher fuel and oxidizer flows) for the J missions, could be made to generate 7.7 million. A difference of 20,000 or 30,000 lbs payload weight would, I would think, have a perceptible impact on the initial climb rate, though. Remember, we're not talking using 6.5 million lbs of thrust to lift just that payload -- the Shuttle stack itself at liftoff, without payload, weighs something on the order of 6 million lbs. It's the overage between the thrust and the liftoff weight that determines rate of climb. The Saturn V weighed more than 7 million lbs at liftoff, the overage of thrust to weight was less than you get with the Shuttle, hence the slower climb-off. -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 05:13 PM
Post
#45
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
Installation of the air pump into the station toilet is complete, and after several test runs appears to be working just fine now. Good. I was concerned that the meet-and-greet after hatch opening Monday was going to consist of Volkov saying "Hello, welcome to Alpha. Now get out of the way, we need to use your toilet!" -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 05:27 PM
Post
#46
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
A difference of 20,000 or 30,000 lbs payload weight would, I would think, have a perceptible impact on the initial climb rate, though. Remember, we're not talking using 6.5 million lbs of thrust to lift just that payload -- the Shuttle stack itself at liftoff, without payload, weighs something on the order of 6 million lbs. 30 000 lbs in 6 000 000 is 0.5% mass difference. The initial acceleration differs from the empty stack acceleration by about 1%. By the time the Shuttle normally clears the tower, it changes acceleration much more than that due to weight lost to expelled propellant - if my quick back-of-the envelope calculation is right, 30 000 lbs is about the amount of mass burned by two SRBs alone in about 2 seconds, based on average consumption rate. I'd personally say the perceived acceleration of a launch vehicle at liftoff is inversely proportional to the amount of excitement of the observer. -------------------- |
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 05:47 PM
Post
#47
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
Good. I was concerned that the meet-and-greet after hatch opening Monday was going to consist of Volkov saying "Hello, welcome to Alpha. Now get out of the way, we need to use your toilet!" -the other Doug It may have! -------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 06:05 PM
Post
#48
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
I'd personally say the perceived acceleration of a launch vehicle at liftoff is inversely proportional to the amount of excitement of the observer. And there, my friend, you have an excellent point. I should also note that Discovery took off, cleared the tower, and immediately rolled onto a northern heading, which is not the most common heading for an ISS mission. Could be that the pitch onto the preplanned flight path, from the camera angle I was watching, gave the optical illusion of the slowing of the stack's rise when nothing of the sort was actually happening. -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 06:21 PM
Post
#49
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
You may jest - but there was a great 'home movie' style downlink during hatch opening. I could swear I heard someone say 'wow - can you smell it?' when the hatch opened, and literally within 2 minutes of going onboard, they told the ISS crew that the STS toilet was ready for them to use.
Doug |
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 06:41 PM
Post
#50
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Could be that the pitch onto the preplanned flight path, from the camera angle I was watching, gave the optical illusion of the slowing of the stack's rise when nothing of the sort was actually happening. Speaking of camera angles, there was a great shot of Discovery eclipsing the Sun for one of the cameras at about the time the commentator says "man-made rising sun". It was pretty neat. -------------------- |
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 08:04 PM
Post
#51
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2921 Joined: 14-February 06 From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France) Member No.: 682 |
What did Reisman said after ringing the bell? ??? arriving!
-------------------- |
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 08:04 PM
Post
#52
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
What did Reisman said after ringing the bell? ??? arriving! Discovery. -------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 08:45 PM
Post
#53
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2921 Joined: 14-February 06 From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France) Member No.: 682 |
Discovery. I know, I know, I was joking (better say, I tried to) -------------------- |
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 08:52 PM
Post
#54
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
Oooh... sorry. I didn't pick up on that.
Awaiting reestablishment of Ku communications for Kibo ingress. Going to look awfully big inside of there. -------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 08:57 PM
Post
#55
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2921 Joined: 14-February 06 From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France) Member No.: 682 |
Awaiting reestablishment of Ku communications for Kibo ingress. Going to look awfully big inside of there. Sorry, I've got to get ouside since ISS is coming in 5 minutes with a -2.5 magnitude -------------------- |
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 09:03 PM
Post
#56
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
-------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 09:05 PM
Post
#57
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
Yeah, they said it's open, but the hatch is still closed.
They do have the camera inside Kibo operating, though. Very, very empty-looking module at the moment. Now the hatch is open. We're in business! -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 09:08 PM
Post
#58
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
-------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 09:14 PM
Post
#59
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
-------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 10:12 PM
Post
#60
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1583 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
Wow, when do they fill all of that empty rackspace?!
|
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 10:48 PM
Post
#61
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
Wow, when do they fill all of that empty rackspace?! I'm not sure the answer to that. Over the course of this docked mission there will be *some* racks moved in: definitely from the JLM and possibly from Destiny (though I'm not sure about that one. All I know is that the US owns some of the rack space in Kibo). Someone was kind enough to put the ingress video on YouTube: [LINK] -------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 4 2008, 10:53 PM
Post
#62
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
Speak of the devil...
Racks being moved into Kibo now. The JLM was launched with 8 racks, and those are being relocated to the JPM. The JPM has a 23 rack capacity, though, so I imagine the rest will be coming up slowly over the subsequent shuttle flights, ATV flights (maybe?) and HTV flights when they start. -------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 5 2008, 01:50 AM
Post
#63
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1583 Joined: 14-October 05 From: Vermont Member No.: 530 |
I went googling, and there is some good info on Kibo's planned racks here:
http://kibo.jaxa.jp/en/experiment/ It'll have an aquarium |
|
|
Jun 5 2008, 02:00 AM
Post
#64
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
A weightless aquarium? That would be interesting.
-------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 5 2008, 02:48 AM
Post
#65
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 96 Joined: 20-September 06 From: Hanoi, Vietnam Member No.: 1164 |
|
|
|
Jun 5 2008, 03:38 AM
Post
#66
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
Just got a little more info on the racks. Four were launched inside the module, with eight being transfered from the JLM. Obviously that's 12 total, and we're more than halfway to its capacity already.
-------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 5 2008, 06:35 AM
Post
#67
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
The ATV can't do racks - because it docks to the Russian side, and the russian hatches are smaller than a full rack - you've got to dock to one of the large US hatches, so it'll be via MPLM's, or possibly HTV, or possibly Dragon.
|
|
|
Jun 5 2008, 06:47 AM
Post
#68
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Doug, what the heck are you doing up? Oh. Right. I've gone and worked late enough that it's your morning
--Emily -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Jun 5 2008, 03:01 PM
Post
#69
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
The ATV can't do racks... You're absolutely right, for all the reasons you gave. I knew there was something that felt not right about the ATV bringing up US racks when I typed it. Thanks for setting me straight. Today is EVA #2, and as I write the airlock is being depressurized. On tap today are:
-------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 6 2008, 12:50 AM
Post
#70
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
EVA #2 concluded after about 7 hours and 11 minutes today. All the planned tasks were completed, and additionally the port SARJ was inspected. The point of this activity was to compare/contrast this healthy SARJ with the damaged one.
There was some unexpected grease seen in this SARJ, but apparently that isn't raising any concerns for the engineers on the ground... at least not at this point. -------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 6 2008, 02:32 AM
Post
#71
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
-------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 6 2008, 12:24 PM
Post
#72
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 809 Joined: 11-March 04 Member No.: 56 |
|
|
|
Jun 6 2008, 03:27 PM
Post
#73
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
-------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 6 2008, 03:35 PM
Post
#74
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8784 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
...gotta admit, that's just cute as hell!!!
Potentially, that's great outreach for the very young. My daughter made me carry around a Ken doll for about two years when she was 4-5, loved nothing more then to "play Barbies". Hopefully, the parents of young children are getting the word about Buzz. -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Jun 6 2008, 08:11 PM
Post
#75
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
The JLM has been relocated from the zenith port of Harmony to its final home attached to the JPM. No word yet on how instrumental Buzz Lightyear's assistance was to the success of this operation.
-------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 8 2008, 02:37 PM
Post
#76
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
Video: Buzz vs. Buzz
-------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 10 2008, 08:13 PM
Post
#77
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
The docked mission of Discovery and ISS has come to a close. The two crews said goodbye to each other a few minutes ago. All objectives were completed along with a good amount of get ahead work.
Undocking will occur tomorrow morning and will be followed by the standard inspection, this time with the sensor boom (OBSS). -------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 11 2008, 02:37 PM
Post
#78
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
Discovery successfully undocked from the ISS this morning. Such a dramatic difference between what the station looks like today and what it looked like a year ago!
-------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 11 2008, 03:05 PM
Post
#79
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14432 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
As a European, I feel a bid inadequate looking at the ISS like that now - it's very lop-sided
|
|
|
Jun 11 2008, 03:07 PM
Post
#80
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
Don't forget about the Jules Verne, docked to the Russian segment.
-------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 13 2008, 02:13 PM
Post
#81
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 753 Joined: 23-October 04 From: Greensboro, NC USA Member No.: 103 |
You don't like to see pieces of your spacecraft floating away...hopefully this is in an area that will neither be subject to high heat loads or will affect steering once in the atmosphere. Maybe it was something floating out of the payload bay. Looking forward to more news on this:
"After completing a standard day-before-landing test of the shuttle steering jets, the crew indicated they had seen a one-foot- to 1.5-foot-long rectangular object floating away from the shuttle from behind the rear portion of the right wing. Shortly afterwards, the crew described what they called a "bump" on the left side trailing edge of Discovery's rudder. Experts on the ground are examining images and video of the object and the "bump" while the crew continues to stow items in the cabin for Saturday's planned landing." -------------------- Jonathan Ward
Manning the LCC at http://www.apollolaunchcontrol.com |
|
|
Jun 13 2008, 03:15 PM
Post
#82
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 10 Joined: 17-November 07 From: in a IA corn field Member No.: 3963 |
Based on preliminary examination of photos taken this morning showing a piece of debris floating away from the space shuttle Discovery, NASA mission managers think it will pose no threat to the shuttle.
"[It's not] considered to be a critical item… So far it doesn’t appear to pose any concern for the safe return of the astronauts to the Kennedy Space Center tomorrow," said NASA commentator Rob Navias. Mission managers also think the small protuberance that was seen on the rudder this morning is a small piece of thermal insulation associated with that clip. They also think this is unlikely to cause problems for the shuttle landing. |
|
|
Jun 13 2008, 03:21 PM
Post
#83
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
The initial assessment is that it's a thermal clip from the Rudder Speed Brake, and is of no impact for landing. Of course their analysis is still ongoing...
-------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 13 2008, 09:16 PM
Post
#84
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 648 Joined: 9-May 05 From: Subotica Member No.: 384 |
Finally!!!
These "fly around" images are usually posted sooner but here they are: 7 lovely images.... http://www.spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/im...124e009968.html http://www.spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/im...124e009973.html http://www.spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/im...124e009982.html http://www.spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/im...124e009990.html http://www.spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/im...124e010006.html http://www.spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/im...124e010013.html http://www.spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/im...124e010042.html Beautiful isn't she? -------------------- The scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, and he delights in it because it is beautiful.
Jules H. Poincare My "Astrophotos" gallery on flickr... |
|
|
Jun 13 2008, 11:19 PM
Post
#85
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1229 Joined: 24-December 05 From: The blue one in between the yellow and red ones. Member No.: 618 |
Do I see a pair of jet contrails far below between the ends of Columbus and the adjacent radiator array? -------------------- My Grandpa goes to Mars every day and all I get are these lousy T-shirts!
|
|
|
Jun 13 2008, 11:21 PM
Post
#86
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3648 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
Far too large to be a plane. Looks like a reflection in the window to me. There's a third "trail", parallel to the two ones and a bit to above and left.
-------------------- |
|
|
Jun 14 2008, 01:18 AM
Post
#87
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1229 Joined: 24-December 05 From: The blue one in between the yellow and red ones. Member No.: 618 |
I was thinking of a pair of fighters in loose formation, but I'll admit the reflection is a possibility.
-------------------- My Grandpa goes to Mars every day and all I get are these lousy T-shirts!
|
|
|
Jun 14 2008, 01:30 AM
Post
#88
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
There are window reflections in a lot of photos from the shuttle. That's undoubtedly what you're seeing (I see it too).
-------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 14 2008, 06:54 AM
Post
#89
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
Beautiful isn't she? Absolutely. No doubt about it. A much-maligned lady. -------------------- |
|
|
Jun 14 2008, 03:18 PM
Post
#90
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8784 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Down and safe, an entirely unremarkable landing...just like we like them! Welcome home, Discovery.
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Jun 14 2008, 03:24 PM
Post
#91
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
Agreed. A great two weeks for Discovery and the ISS. Next up for her is the delivery of the last set of solar array wings to station. But next up for us is Atlantis and the Hubble Servicing Mission!
-------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Jun 14 2008, 07:37 PM
Post
#92
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 191 Joined: 20-November 06 From: Saint Louis Member No.: 1376 |
A parting shot of Discovery as she is towed back to the OPF to begin processing for STS-119.
-------------------- - Matt
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th May 2024 - 04:37 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |