IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

STS-124, Kibo to the ISS
David
post May 31 2008, 02:33 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 809
Joined: 11-March 04
Member No.: 56



Discovery is currently being fueled on pad 39A.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
7 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 91)
karolp
post May 31 2008, 03:42 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 14-April 06
From: Berlin
Member No.: 744



I've just read the press kit for STS-124 and it turns out that out of the 7 people going up, 5 are going into space for the very first time, with the other 2 having flown once and twice respectively - the commander has flown earlier twice as a pilot, and Mission Specialist-3 has flown once before. Also, the fuel tank used in this mission is the first redesigned version actually used after return to flight. The tanks used previously were fitted with modifications in the post-production process.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marz
post May 31 2008, 04:17 PM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 311
Joined: 31-August 05
From: Florida & Texas, USA
Member No.: 482




Looks like they've saved the best module for last; Kibo's the largest and has compartments for exposing experiments to space.

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/...ements/jem.html

The weather looks great too; clear skies and not too windy.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post May 31 2008, 04:23 PM
Post #4


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Where can one find the ground track map for launch? It appears it should pass right overhead for me so I thought about going out for a look.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
karolp
post May 31 2008, 05:12 PM
Post #5


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 14-April 06
From: Berlin
Member No.: 744



QUOTE (ugordan @ May 31 2008, 06:23 PM) *
Where can one find the ground track map for launch? It appears it should pass right overhead for me so I thought about going out for a look.


Hi ugordan,

Try:

http://heavens-above.com/?Loc=Zagreb&L...=131&TZ=CET

After it launches. I have been using this service since 1999 and it is perfect not only for the shuttle but also for observing the ISS and other satellites.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post May 31 2008, 05:19 PM
Post #6


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Thanks, karolp. I use Heavens Above for ISS flyovers, but I wasn't sure how quickly STS orbits are input there.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
karolp
post May 31 2008, 05:45 PM
Post #7


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 147
Joined: 14-April 06
From: Berlin
Member No.: 744



The orbit of Discovery is going to be very similar to that of the ISS since they are going to dock eventually :-) Therefore, even if the parameters are not there on time, assuming a flyover pattern similar to the station would be a pretty good guess.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post May 31 2008, 06:06 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Yes, but while ISS orbit is fixed in inertial space (more or less), its ground track is not. Earth is rotating underneath and two objects sharing same the same orbit with one trailing in its orbit will have different groundtracks. How much different depends on how long it takes for the trailing one to cross the separation.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post May 31 2008, 06:17 PM
Post #9


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



This is not entirely what you were asking for, but this is what I use when looking for overflights of STS/ISS:

LINK

Just plug in your location and voila!

(I'm not sure if this map will include the shuttle or not once it launches)


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post May 31 2008, 06:26 PM
Post #10





Guests






Hmm... how are they going to relocate the logistic module? It's currently attached to Harmony, but in the final configuration it has to be attached to the main Kibo module. As far as I see, there are only three EVAs planned blink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcel
post May 31 2008, 06:29 PM
Post #11


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 290
Joined: 26-March 04
From: Edam, The Netherlands
Member No.: 65



I have been searching the web for typical trajectories of the space shuttle for a long time now.
Anyone knows where to find graphs showing height, downrange distance, speed, acceleration, weight, etc. in time during launch (until orbit insertion) ?


Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post May 31 2008, 06:46 PM
Post #12


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



QUOTE (Zvezdichko @ May 31 2008, 01:26 PM) *
Hmm... how are they going to relocate the logistic module? It's currently attached to Harmony, but in the final configuration it has to be attached to the main Kibo module. As far as I see, there are only three EVAs planned blink.gif


I don't recall the exact timelines, but the logistics module will be closed up and relocated to its final location using the station's robotic arm. I am not sure if the EVA'ers will have to assist much with that task.

Marcel, I'm sure such documentation exists somewhere, but I don't know where you might find it. The commentators on NASA TV do read off that info during their coverage of launch, though.


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post May 31 2008, 06:56 PM
Post #13





Guests






Thank you. I suppose thy will just attach the arm to the module.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post May 31 2008, 09:27 PM
Post #14


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



WOW!!!!!!!!! Just saw the orbiter and ET flying in formation thru the sky over kendal... ET very distinctive orange colour, orbiter blue-white, less than a degree apart... sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet ;-)


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post May 31 2008, 09:27 PM
Post #15


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



Successful launch!


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Guest_Zvezdichko_*
post May 31 2008, 09:32 PM
Post #16





Guests






I saw a lot of debris falling away. Hope nothing struck the orbiter.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mars loon
post May 31 2008, 09:36 PM
Post #17


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 548
Joined: 19-March 05
From: Princeton, NJ, USA
Member No.: 212



beautiful launch

a small piece of foam did strike the underbelly of the shuttle shortly after SRB sep.

clearly visible via the camera on the ET.

did not appear to strike the RCC panels on the wing leading edge

this is likely after the period of much concern, but will be an area of close, detailed investigation during the crew inspection
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post May 31 2008, 09:58 PM
Post #18


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1583
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



QUOTE (mars loon @ May 31 2008, 04:36 PM) *
this is likely after the period of much concern, but will be an area of close, detailed investigation during the crew inspection


Incidentally, they'll have to wait until they pick the boom system up at the station-- it wouldn't fit in the bay with Kibo. It's too bad there will likely be more concern on this launch.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mars loon
post May 31 2008, 10:21 PM
Post #19


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 548
Joined: 19-March 05
From: Princeton, NJ, USA
Member No.: 212



At a NASA press conference on going at this moment, Bill Gerstenmaier just said "the foam strike is not of much concern". But off course they will check it throughly after picking up the OBSS at the ISS, during the back flip, etc
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 1 2008, 05:21 PM
Post #20


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



TPS inspections are complete for today. They're having to make do without the OBSS (the sensor boom) for this inspection due to the size of Kibo.

Tomorrow we dock!


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jun 2 2008, 04:10 PM
Post #21


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



For those who missed Saturday's Discovery/ET flyover of Europe...



--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jun 2 2008, 04:52 PM
Post #22


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



Discovery approaching ISS right now... gorgeous pix on NASA TV...

http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/nasa/index.html



--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Jun 2 2008, 05:06 PM
Post #23


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1887
Joined: 20-November 04
From: Iowa
Member No.: 110



I notice the solar panels are still aligned differently on opposite ends of the station.
Anyone know when that is planned to be fixed?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 2 2008, 05:38 PM
Post #24


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



QUOTE (alan @ Jun 2 2008, 12:06 PM) *
I notice the solar panels are still aligned differently on opposite ends of the station.
Anyone know when that is planned to be fixed?


This is done on purpose to protect the arrays from docking and undocking vehicles. The Russian vehicles have their arrays 'feathered' as well right now, as are some of the radiators.

The overall SARJ issue (the massive joint that rotates the starboard array) has not yet been resolved, though. There will be an attempt to clean the joint during this docked mission, and work will continue beyond that throughout the year.


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 2 2008, 05:47 PM
Post #25


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



Discovery is within 150 feet of docking. They are in an orbital night right now, but the features within the payload bay can be made out.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 2 2008, 06:05 PM
Post #26


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



Discovery has successfully docked to the ISS.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 2 2008, 07:42 PM
Post #27


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



And now with hatch opening the crews can finally come together.


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 3 2008, 02:32 PM
Post #28


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



Today is the mission's first EVA. Tasks on hand:

  • Release the straps from the Shuttle robotic arm elbow camera
  • Transfer the OBSS from Station to Shuttle
  • Inspect the starboard SARJ
  • Reinstall trundle bearing assembly into the SARJ
  • Demonstrate cleaning technique on SARJ
  • Prepare Kibo for installation on Station


This EVA is scheduled to start in about an hour, and scheduled to last 6 1/2 hours.


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kspace
post Jun 3 2008, 04:22 PM
Post #29


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 17-November 07
From: in a IA corn field
Member No.: 3963



Has anyone else seen this article?

http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/08060...39a-damage.html

or seen anymore pictures of the damage?

Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image


Of all the launches I have seen I have never seen damage to the pad like this. Could it just be the aging pad or was it the fact they were taking the larges element to the station? Would they have needed more power at liftoff because of Kibo's weight?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 3 2008, 04:26 PM
Post #30


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



They're trying to figure it out as we speak. The structure was old, initially built in the 60's. And Kibo is certainly a heavier payload, but not the heaviest payload even since return to flight.

But yeah, your assessment is pretty much the same as those close to the program. Never seen such damage before.

(edited to remove quote)


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 3 2008, 04:28 PM
Post #31


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



EVA #1 has begun, just shy of one hour late. This spacewalk was delayed by a communications issue with one of the suits.


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kspace
post Jun 3 2008, 05:14 PM
Post #32


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 17-November 07
From: in a IA corn field
Member No.: 3963



Here is another article on that damage

httpwww.spaceflightnow.comshuttlests124080601pad


Attached Image

Attached Image

Attached Image

Attached Image
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Jun 3 2008, 07:21 PM
Post #33


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



I have no idea if this contributed to the pad damage, but I thought it quite noticeable that Discovery's rise off the pad was significantly slower than I'm used to seeing for a shuttle. I attributed it to the weight of Kibo, which IIRC is one of the heaviest payloads the shuttle has ever carried.

Could a fractional increase in the time it took for the stack to clear the pad have added enough stress to the flame diversion pits and the entire pad structure that damage you wouldn't have seen after a "regular" launch was caused by this one?

The flame trench, after all, has stood up to eleven Saturn V launches and countless (nearing 100) shuttle launches. Is it merely age and wear that finally got to it this time, I wonder, or a slightly more stressful launch sequence?

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jun 3 2008, 07:39 PM
Post #34


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



It didn't look that much slower to me. The Saturns took forever to get off the pad on the other hand. I'd say this is just age doing its thing.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jun 3 2008, 08:53 PM
Post #35


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8784
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



I agree. Aging infrastructure problems rear their ugly head again. Whatever sort of mortar or adhesive that held the bricks together looks like it finally gave up the ghost.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BPCooper
post Jun 3 2008, 10:10 PM
Post #36


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 183
Joined: 22-October 05
From: Cape Canaveral, FL
Member No.: 534



The difference between a 32,000 lbs module or even having an empty payload bay has little effect on 7.5 million lbs of thrust.

This was not even the heaviest ISS piece taken up by the shuttle, remember.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lyford
post Jun 4 2008, 01:10 AM
Post #37


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1281
Joined: 18-December 04
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 124



QUOTE (ugordan @ Jun 3 2008, 11:39 AM) *
The Saturns took forever to get off the pad on the other hand.

And looked so much the more awesome for it smile.gif


--------------------
Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!" Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jun 4 2008, 05:28 AM
Post #38


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



NASA TV currently showing some very cool footage of Kibo being unberthed from Discovery...

Attached Image


(Don't know if it's live or not; I just got up and that's what they're showing...)

Edit: ah. Obviously not live as they're now showing something else. Oh well, still great pics smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 4 2008, 01:41 PM
Post #39


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



That was from the 'flight day highlights' video package they air during the crew's sleep period, and showed part of the installation of Kibo. Today we get our first peek inside.


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ilbasso
post Jun 4 2008, 01:47 PM
Post #40


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 753
Joined: 23-October 04
From: Greensboro, NC USA
Member No.: 103



OK, I have to say something about Karen Nyberg's hair. As a red-blooded male, I'm 100% in favor of long blonde hair, but hers looks kinda dangerous floating around in microgravity! I have seen Dr. Nyberg tie her hair back or put it up on a few of the inflight videos, but I'm watching it float all over the place again this morning. Wouldn't you think that would create some horrendous tangles? I remember that Judith Resnick's hair actually got caught in the IMAX camera on an early Shuttle mission.

OK, got that out of my system.


--------------------
Jonathan Ward
Manning the LCC at http://www.apollolaunchcontrol.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lyford
post Jun 4 2008, 02:54 PM
Post #41


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1281
Joined: 18-December 04
From: San Diego, CA
Member No.: 124



Well, no one beats Sunita for long locks.... smile.gif
Would she be a member of the Luxuriant Flowing Hair Club for Scientists?


--------------------
Lyford Rome
"Zis is not nuts, zis is super-nuts!" Mathematician Richard Courant on viewing an Orion test
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 4 2008, 03:59 PM
Post #42


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



Installation of the air pump into the station toilet is complete, and after several test runs appears to be working just fine now.


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
MahFL
post Jun 4 2008, 04:55 PM
Post #43


Forum Contributor
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1372
Joined: 8-February 04
From: North East Florida, USA.
Member No.: 11



QUOTE (jmjawors @ Jun 4 2008, 04:59 PM) *
Installation of the air pump into the station toilet is complete, and after several test runs appears to be working just fine now.


".....ahhhhhhh....." sounds from the Station.....smile.gif.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Jun 4 2008, 05:11 PM
Post #44


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (BPCooper @ Jun 3 2008, 05:10 PM) *
The difference between a 32,000 lbs module or even having an empty payload bay has little effect on 7.5 million lbs of thrust.

This was not even the heaviest ISS piece taken up by the shuttle, remember.

True, this was not the heaviest Shuttle to launch. If I'm remembering correctly, the heaviest stack at liftoff wasn't even an ISS msission -- that honor goes to the flight that launched Hubble. Again, IIRC.

However, um... I thought the Shuttle stack generated a total of about 6.5 million lbs of thrust (or whateve the heck that is in Newtons) at liftoff, roughly 2.5 million per SRB and a total of 1.5 million for the three SSMEs. The Saturn V developed a design spec of 7.5 million, and with the F-1 engines uprated slightly (higher fuel and oxidizer flows) for the J missions, could be made to generate 7.7 million.

A difference of 20,000 or 30,000 lbs payload weight would, I would think, have a perceptible impact on the initial climb rate, though. Remember, we're not talking using 6.5 million lbs of thrust to lift just that payload -- the Shuttle stack itself at liftoff, without payload, weighs something on the order of 6 million lbs. It's the overage between the thrust and the liftoff weight that determines rate of climb. The Saturn V weighed more than 7 million lbs at liftoff, the overage of thrust to weight was less than you get with the Shuttle, hence the slower climb-off.

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Jun 4 2008, 05:13 PM
Post #45


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (jmjawors @ Jun 4 2008, 10:59 AM) *
Installation of the air pump into the station toilet is complete, and after several test runs appears to be working just fine now.

Good. I was concerned that the meet-and-greet after hatch opening Monday was going to consist of Volkov saying "Hello, welcome to Alpha. Now get out of the way, we need to use your toilet!"

smile.gif

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jun 4 2008, 05:27 PM
Post #46


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (dvandorn @ Jun 4 2008, 07:11 PM) *
A difference of 20,000 or 30,000 lbs payload weight would, I would think, have a perceptible impact on the initial climb rate, though. Remember, we're not talking using 6.5 million lbs of thrust to lift just that payload -- the Shuttle stack itself at liftoff, without payload, weighs something on the order of 6 million lbs.

30 000 lbs in 6 000 000 is 0.5% mass difference. The initial acceleration differs from the empty stack acceleration by about 1%. By the time the Shuttle normally clears the tower, it changes acceleration much more than that due to weight lost to expelled propellant - if my quick back-of-the envelope calculation is right, 30 000 lbs is about the amount of mass burned by two SRBs alone in about 2 seconds, based on average consumption rate.

I'd personally say the perceived acceleration of a launch vehicle at liftoff is inversely proportional to the amount of excitement of the observer. wink.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 4 2008, 05:47 PM
Post #47


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



QUOTE (dvandorn @ Jun 4 2008, 12:13 PM) *
Good. I was concerned that the meet-and-greet after hatch opening Monday was going to consist of Volkov saying "Hello, welcome to Alpha. Now get out of the way, we need to use your toilet!"

smile.gif

-the other Doug


It may have! smile.gif


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Jun 4 2008, 06:05 PM
Post #48


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



QUOTE (ugordan @ Jun 4 2008, 12:27 PM) *
I'd personally say the perceived acceleration of a launch vehicle at liftoff is inversely proportional to the amount of excitement of the observer. wink.gif

And there, my friend, you have an excellent point. I should also note that Discovery took off, cleared the tower, and immediately rolled onto a northern heading, which is not the most common heading for an ISS mission. Could be that the pitch onto the preplanned flight path, from the camera angle I was watching, gave the optical illusion of the slowing of the stack's rise when nothing of the sort was actually happening.

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jun 4 2008, 06:21 PM
Post #49


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



You may jest - but there was a great 'home movie' style downlink during hatch opening. I could swear I heard someone say 'wow - can you smell it?' when the hatch opened, and literally within 2 minutes of going onboard, they told the ISS crew that the STS toilet was ready for them to use.

Doug
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jun 4 2008, 06:41 PM
Post #50


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



QUOTE (dvandorn @ Jun 4 2008, 08:05 PM) *
Could be that the pitch onto the preplanned flight path, from the camera angle I was watching, gave the optical illusion of the slowing of the stack's rise when nothing of the sort was actually happening.

Speaking of camera angles, there was a great shot of Discovery eclipsing the Sun for one of the cameras at about the time the commentator says "man-made rising sun". It was pretty neat.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Jun 4 2008, 08:04 PM
Post #51


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2921
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



What did Reisman said after ringing the bell? ??? arriving!


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 4 2008, 08:04 PM
Post #52


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



QUOTE (climber @ Jun 4 2008, 03:04 PM) *
What did Reisman said after ringing the bell? ??? arriving!


Discovery. smile.gif


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Jun 4 2008, 08:45 PM
Post #53


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2921
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (jmjawors @ Jun 4 2008, 10:04 PM) *
Discovery. smile.gif

I know, I know, I was joking (better say, I tried to)


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 4 2008, 08:52 PM
Post #54


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



Oooh... sorry. I didn't pick up on that. blink.gif

Awaiting reestablishment of Ku communications for Kibo ingress. Going to look awfully big inside of there.


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
climber
post Jun 4 2008, 08:57 PM
Post #55


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2921
Joined: 14-February 06
From: Very close to the Pyrénées Mountains (France)
Member No.: 682



QUOTE (jmjawors @ Jun 4 2008, 10:52 PM) *
Awaiting reestablishment of Ku communications for Kibo ingress. Going to look awfully big inside of there.

Sorry, I've got to get ouside since ISS is coming in 5 minutes with a -2.5 magnitude smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 4 2008, 09:03 PM
Post #56


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



"The JPM is open!"


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image

 


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dvandorn
post Jun 4 2008, 09:05 PM
Post #57


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3419
Joined: 9-February 04
From: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Member No.: 15



Yeah, they said it's open, but the hatch is still closed.

They do have the camera inside Kibo operating, though. Very, very empty-looking module at the moment.

Now the hatch is open. We're in business!

-the other Doug


--------------------
“The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 4 2008, 09:08 PM
Post #58


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



View from a camera on the opposite end of the JPM, watching the ingress.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 4 2008, 09:14 PM
Post #59


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



Full ingress has occurred.


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
Attached Image
 


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Jun 4 2008, 10:12 PM
Post #60


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1583
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



Wow, when do they fill all of that empty rackspace?!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 4 2008, 10:48 PM
Post #61


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



QUOTE (stevesliva @ Jun 4 2008, 05:12 PM) *
Wow, when do they fill all of that empty rackspace?!


I'm not sure the answer to that. Over the course of this docked mission there will be *some* racks moved in: definitely from the JLM and possibly from Destiny (though I'm not sure about that one. All I know is that the US owns some of the rack space in Kibo).

Someone was kind enough to put the ingress video on YouTube:

[LINK]


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 4 2008, 10:53 PM
Post #62


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



Speak of the devil...

Racks being moved into Kibo now. The JLM was launched with 8 racks, and those are being relocated to the JPM. The JPM has a 23 rack capacity, though, so I imagine the rest will be coming up slowly over the subsequent shuttle flights, ATV flights (maybe?) and HTV flights when they start.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image

 


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stevesliva
post Jun 5 2008, 01:50 AM
Post #63


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1583
Joined: 14-October 05
From: Vermont
Member No.: 530



I went googling, and there is some good info on Kibo's planned racks here:
http://kibo.jaxa.jp/en/experiment/

It'll have an aquarium wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 5 2008, 02:00 AM
Post #64


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



A weightless aquarium? That would be interesting.


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Thu
post Jun 5 2008, 02:48 AM
Post #65


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 96
Joined: 20-September 06
From: Hanoi, Vietnam
Member No.: 1164



QUOTE (dvandorn @ Jun 5 2008, 12:13 AM) *
Good. I was concerned that the meet-and-greet after hatch opening Monday was going to consist of Volkov saying "Hello, welcome to Alpha. Now get out of the way, we need to use your toilet!"

smile.gif

-the other Doug


This is soooooooooooo funny laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 5 2008, 03:38 AM
Post #66


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



Just got a little more info on the racks. Four were launched inside the module, with eight being transfered from the JLM. Obviously that's 12 total, and we're more than halfway to its capacity already.


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jun 5 2008, 06:35 AM
Post #67


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



The ATV can't do racks - because it docks to the Russian side, and the russian hatches are smaller than a full rack - you've got to dock to one of the large US hatches, so it'll be via MPLM's, or possibly HTV, or possibly Dragon.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elakdawalla
post Jun 5 2008, 06:47 AM
Post #68


Administrator
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 5172
Joined: 4-August 05
From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth
Member No.: 454



Doug, what the heck are you doing up? Oh. Right. I've gone and worked late enough that it's your morning smile.gif

--Emily


--------------------
My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 5 2008, 03:01 PM
Post #69


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



QUOTE (djellison @ Jun 5 2008, 01:35 AM) *
The ATV can't do racks...


You're absolutely right, for all the reasons you gave. I knew there was something that felt not right about the ATV bringing up US racks when I typed it. Thanks for setting me straight. smile.gif

Today is EVA #2, and as I write the airlock is being depressurized. On tap today are:
  • Installation of TV equipment on the exterior of Kibo
  • Prepare Kibo's robotic arm for its first deployment
  • Prepare Kibo's berthing port for the relocation of the JLM
  • Further outfitting of Kibo's exterior
  • Prepare a Nitrogen tank assembly for replacement
  • Remove a truss TV camera, to be brought inside and repaired


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 6 2008, 12:50 AM
Post #70


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



EVA #2 concluded after about 7 hours and 11 minutes today. All the planned tasks were completed, and additionally the port SARJ was inspected. The point of this activity was to compare/contrast this healthy SARJ with the damaged one.

There was some unexpected grease seen in this SARJ, but apparently that isn't raising any concerns for the engineers on the ground... at least not at this point.


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 6 2008, 02:32 AM
Post #71


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



Buzz Lightyear makes his appearance on the flight deck of Discovery:
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
David
post Jun 6 2008, 12:24 PM
Post #72


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 809
Joined: 11-March 04
Member No.: 56



QUOTE (jmjawors @ Jun 6 2008, 02:32 AM) *
Buzz Lightyear makes his appearance on the flight deck of Discovery:


What's Buzz's assignment in the crew? Payload specialist maybe? Or is he going to be a long-term visitor to the ISS?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 6 2008, 03:27 PM
Post #73


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



Looks like Buzz is a station crew member.

[LINK]


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jun 6 2008, 03:35 PM
Post #74


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8784
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



laugh.gif ...gotta admit, that's just cute as hell!!!

Potentially, that's great outreach for the very young. My daughter made me carry around a Ken doll for about two years when she was 4-5, loved nothing more then to "play Barbies". Hopefully, the parents of young children are getting the word about Buzz.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 6 2008, 08:11 PM
Post #75


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



The JLM has been relocated from the zenith port of Harmony to its final home attached to the JPM. No word yet on how instrumental Buzz Lightyear's assistance was to the success of this operation.


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 8 2008, 02:37 PM
Post #76


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



Video: Buzz vs. Buzz


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 10 2008, 08:13 PM
Post #77


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



The docked mission of Discovery and ISS has come to a close. The two crews said goodbye to each other a few minutes ago. All objectives were completed along with a good amount of get ahead work.

Undocking will occur tomorrow morning and will be followed by the standard inspection, this time with the sensor boom (OBSS).


Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
Attached Image

 


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 11 2008, 02:37 PM
Post #78


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



Discovery successfully undocked from the ISS this morning. Such a dramatic difference between what the station looks like today and what it looked like a year ago!

Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
djellison
post Jun 11 2008, 03:05 PM
Post #79


Founder
****

Group: Chairman
Posts: 14432
Joined: 8-February 04
Member No.: 1



As a European, I feel a bid inadequate looking at the ISS like that now - it's very lop-sided smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 11 2008, 03:07 PM
Post #80


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



Don't forget about the Jules Verne, docked to the Russian segment. smile.gif


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ilbasso
post Jun 13 2008, 02:13 PM
Post #81


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 753
Joined: 23-October 04
From: Greensboro, NC USA
Member No.: 103



You don't like to see pieces of your spacecraft floating away...hopefully this is in an area that will neither be subject to high heat loads or will affect steering once in the atmosphere. Maybe it was something floating out of the payload bay. Looking forward to more news on this:

"After completing a standard day-before-landing test of the shuttle steering jets, the crew indicated they had seen a one-foot- to 1.5-foot-long rectangular object floating away from the shuttle from behind the rear portion of the right wing. Shortly afterwards, the crew described what they called a "bump" on the left side trailing edge of Discovery's rudder. Experts on the ground are examining images and video of the object and the "bump" while the crew continues to stow items in the cabin for Saturday's planned landing."


--------------------
Jonathan Ward
Manning the LCC at http://www.apollolaunchcontrol.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kspace
post Jun 13 2008, 03:15 PM
Post #82


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 17-November 07
From: in a IA corn field
Member No.: 3963



Based on preliminary examination of photos taken this morning showing a piece of debris floating away from the space shuttle Discovery, NASA mission managers think it will pose no threat to the shuttle.

"[It's not] considered to be a critical item… So far it doesn’t appear to pose any concern for the safe return of the astronauts to the Kennedy Space Center tomorrow," said NASA commentator Rob Navias.

Mission managers also think the small protuberance that was seen on the rudder this morning is a small piece of thermal insulation associated with that clip. They also think this is unlikely to cause problems for the shuttle landing.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 13 2008, 03:21 PM
Post #83


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



The initial assessment is that it's a thermal clip from the Rudder Speed Brake, and is of no impact for landing. Of course their analysis is still ongoing...


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Toma B
post Jun 13 2008, 09:16 PM
Post #84


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 648
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Subotica
Member No.: 384



Finally!!!
These "fly around" images are usually posted sooner but here they are:
7 lovely images....
http://www.spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/im...124e009968.html
http://www.spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/im...124e009973.html
http://www.spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/im...124e009982.html
http://www.spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/im...124e009990.html
http://www.spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/im...124e010006.html
http://www.spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/im...124e010013.html
http://www.spaceflight.nasa.gov/gallery/im...124e010042.html

Beautiful isn't she?


--------------------
The scientist does not study nature because it is useful; he studies it because he delights in it, and he delights in it because it is beautiful.
Jules H. Poincare

My "Astrophotos" gallery on flickr...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shaka
post Jun 13 2008, 11:19 PM
Post #85


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1229
Joined: 24-December 05
From: The blue one in between the yellow and red ones.
Member No.: 618



QUOTE (Toma B @ Jun 13 2008, 11:16 AM) *

Do I see a pair of jet contrails far below between the ends of Columbus and the adjacent radiator array? huh.gif


--------------------
My Grandpa goes to Mars every day and all I get are these lousy T-shirts!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ugordan
post Jun 13 2008, 11:21 PM
Post #86


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3648
Joined: 1-October 05
From: Croatia
Member No.: 523



Far too large to be a plane. Looks like a reflection in the window to me. There's a third "trail", parallel to the two ones and a bit to above and left.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Shaka
post Jun 14 2008, 01:18 AM
Post #87


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1229
Joined: 24-December 05
From: The blue one in between the yellow and red ones.
Member No.: 618



I was thinking of a pair of fighters in loose formation, but I'll admit the reflection is a possibility.


--------------------
My Grandpa goes to Mars every day and all I get are these lousy T-shirts!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 14 2008, 01:30 AM
Post #88


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



There are window reflections in a lot of photos from the shuttle. That's undoubtedly what you're seeing (I see it too).


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Stu
post Jun 14 2008, 06:54 AM
Post #89


The Poet Dude
****

Group: Moderator
Posts: 5551
Joined: 15-March 04
From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK
Member No.: 60



QUOTE (Toma B @ Jun 13 2008, 10:16 PM) *
Beautiful isn't she?


Absolutely. No doubt about it. A much-maligned lady. smile.gif


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
nprev
post Jun 14 2008, 03:18 PM
Post #90


Merciless Robot
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 8784
Joined: 8-December 05
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 602



Down and safe, an entirely unremarkable landing...just like we like them! smile.gif Welcome home, Discovery.


--------------------
A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 14 2008, 03:24 PM
Post #91


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



Agreed. A great two weeks for Discovery and the ISS. Next up for her is the delivery of the last set of solar array wings to station. But next up for us is Atlantis and the Hubble Servicing Mission!


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jmjawors
post Jun 14 2008, 07:37 PM
Post #92


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 191
Joined: 20-November 06
From: Saint Louis
Member No.: 1376



A parting shot of Discovery as she is towed back to the OPF to begin processing for STS-119.
Attached thumbnail(s)
Attached Image
 


--------------------
- Matt
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

7 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th May 2024 - 04:37 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.