Mercury Flyby 2 |
Mercury Flyby 2 |
Feb 8 2008, 10:50 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 544 Joined: 17-November 05 From: Oklahoma Member No.: 557 |
|
|
|
Feb 11 2008, 04:26 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 220 Joined: 13-October 05 Member No.: 528 |
I was reading an article on Spacedaily, and ran across this real mathematical puzzler: "Observations during this second Messenger flyby will almost complete the first high-resolution viewing of Mercury, adding another one-third of the planet surface to the 21% of territory not seen by Mariner 10 and first imaged by Messenger in January 2008," says Messenger Project Scientist Ralph McNutt. I'm scratching my noggin over this one. He appears to be saying: Mariner 10 + Messenger Flyby 1 = 21% unimaged, aka. 79% coverage. But if you add another 33% coverage, you get 112% coverage, which can't be correct. Or, perhaps: Mariner 10 + Messenger Flyby 1 = 79% Coverage. Of the 21% left unimaged, Flyby 2 will get 1/3 of that missing coverage, aka 7%, so the total coverage will go up to 86%. Anyone want to chime in? |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st November 2024 - 12:17 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |