Onwards to Uranus and Neptune! |
Onwards to Uranus and Neptune! |
Jan 12 2008, 09:40 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 813 Joined: 8-February 04 From: Arabia Terra Member No.: 12 |
As soon as MESSENGER gets to Mercury, the most poorly explored planets in the solar system will be Uranus and Neptune. Could this lead to a revival of interest in the ice giants and their retinue, in the same way that the existence of New Horizons is perhaps partly due to the Pluto stamp*?
*via Pluto Fast Flyby and later Pluto Kuiper Express |
|
|
Feb 14 2008, 04:20 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8789 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
Again, this is why I wish that there was a 'library' of outer-planet launch opportunities. Seems like trajectory calcs only happen when there is a viable mission proposal like NH in the pipeline; might have the cause & effect relationship backwards here.
If we knew that there were favorable launch opportunities for Uranus & Neptune (even with inner-system gravitational assists) in, say, the late 2020s, then draft mission proposals could start development now. With that much lead time, it's even conceivable that Frontier-class missions would be feasible given assumed technology advances. -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Feb 14 2008, 05:27 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 600 Joined: 26-August 05 Member No.: 476 |
[removed in-line quote]
There may or may not be such a library, but there are usually a couple or more papers each year at the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics conference that discuss trajectories for future missions to places all over the solar system. Probably >95% of these come to naught but some folks are having fun cranking out the plots. Not sure what is gained by a stretched development cycle. There is the risk that product of earlier development efforts be obsolete or difficult to support when launch date comes around. |
|
|
Feb 14 2008, 09:28 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3652 Joined: 1-October 05 From: Croatia Member No.: 523 |
There really is no need for a launch opportunity library for the outer solar system if you want to go from A to C via B. As long as B and C are on the "same side" of the solar system there'll probably be an extended gravity assist trajectory with a varying efficiency over a couple of years. Jupiter would typically be your B body and from then on tweaking the launch date is a piece of cake if you have constraints on launch energy, launch date and/or arrival velocity. These sorts of calculations can be done on demand in a matter of minutes I figure.
More complex slingshot trajectories (involving say Jupiter AND Saturn) to get to Uranus or Neptune will occur rare enough that it's probably no use predicting them that far into the future. Furthermore, they usually impose bigger trajectory constraints which then constrain the slingshot gains. It might prove more efficient to use just an aggressive Jupiter flyby to catapult yourself outward than trying to fly by both J and S for what can turn out to be a weaker boost in the end. -------------------- |
|
|
Feb 14 2008, 05:02 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 23 Joined: 30-June 05 Member No.: 422 |
As long as B and C are on the "same side" of the solar system there'll probably be an extended gravity assist trajectory with a varying efficiency over a couple of years. Jupiter would typically be your B body and from then on tweaking the launch date is a piece of cake if you have constraints on launch energy, launch date and/or arrival velocity. These sorts of calculations can be done on demand in a matter of minutes I figure. Since this is a three body problem (spacecraft, Jupiter, Sun), I believe there is no closed, analytical solution to the problem of finding the best trajectory. I have thus assumed that it is done via Monte Carlo simulations. Alternatively, while there is no analytical solution, there might be good approximations. I'm hoping one of our resident experts will weight in and tell me how slingshot trajectories are calculated, and how computationally intensive the process is. -Kevin |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 31st October 2024 - 11:35 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |