UMSF space history photo of the month |
UMSF space history photo of the month |
Guest_PhilCo126_* |
Jan 3 2008, 06:23 PM
Post
#1
|
Guests |
Maybe we could make this a monthly item, in which we could look back at the history of Unmanned Space missions.
For January 2008 I've chosen an image showing the coverage of the Sun by early Pioneer 5-8 spacecraft. Pioneer 5 to 8, or Pioneer V to VIII using the system of Roman numerals in vogue during the early 1960s for spacecraft designations, were directed towards the Sun along the earth's orbit to monitor solar activity. Pioneer V was launched on 11th March 1960 and provided the very first space weather report 4 to 8 hours before a solar storm hit the Earth. Some of this Pioneer quartet, Pioneer 6-7-8 even provided updates on our Sun's activity during the early Apollo Moon landings in order to check the damaging potential of solar flares to affect the astronauts. |
|
|
Guest_PhilCo126_* |
Mar 29 2008, 07:01 PM
Post
#2
|
Guests |
Doug, the 58 cm diameter spheroidal probe Luna 9 "landed" on the Moon in February 1966 and this capsule weighted 100 kg.
It sat ontop the 1440 kg main bus and was ejected up & sideways by springs, the main bus impacted onto the lunar surface... is there somewhere an official definiton of "soft" landing? Next month's photo = Mariner 4 |
|
|
Mar 29 2008, 07:25 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
Doug, the 58 cm diameter spheroidal probe Luna 9 "landed" on the Moon in February 1966 and this capsule weighted 100 kg. It sat ontop the 1440 kg main bus and was ejected up & sideways by springs, the main bus impacted onto the lunar surface... is there somewhere an official definiton of "soft" landing? Next month's photo = Mariner 4 Well -- Pathfinder was dropped onto Mars from about 100 meters and bounced up half a km on its first bounce, and they called that a soft landing... There was an attempt to define such things as the Mars airbag systems, the early Luna landers (which also used airbags) and the attempted-but-never-successful balsawood-packed Ranger surface instrument packages as "hard survivable landers," but the concept never took solid hold. Any system that delivers a reasonably complex instrument package to the surface of a planet seems to be considered a soft landing system, these days. (I would argue that penetrators are in a special class of their own, neither soft landers nor padded/bagged/protected survivable landers.) -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 31st October 2024 - 10:58 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |