Ideas for a solar panel cleaner |
Ideas for a solar panel cleaner |
May 22 2008, 05:55 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Director of Galilean Photography Group: Members Posts: 896 Joined: 15-July 04 From: Austin, TX Member No.: 93 |
Just had an idea for a solar panel cleaner. Place a small, black tank on top of the deck. At the bottom of the tank is a one-way valve pointing into the tank. At the side of the tank is a pressure-relief valve tied to the dust removal tubes.
This removes the need for storing a gas for the cleaning, as well as any need for a pump. Ready...Set...Rip 'er apart! -------------------- Space Enthusiast Richard Hendricks
-- "The engineers, as usual, made a tremendous fuss. Again as usual, they did the job in half the time they had dismissed as being absolutely impossible." --Rescue Party, Arthur C Clarke Mother Nature is the final inspector of all quality. |
|
|
May 23 2008, 07:51 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 33 Joined: 5-October 06 Member No.: 1223 |
The real answer is just to make the solar panels large enough so that they produce enough power throughout the mission even with dust accumulation. For long duration missions go nuke and have it powered by an RTG, they really are the way to go.
Those are the engineering choices Nasa have made and personally I think they are the best. Next to having an astronaut with a soft bristle brush brush that is. |
|
|
May 29 2008, 03:42 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 87 Joined: 17-May 08 Member No.: 4114 |
The real answer is just to make the solar panels large enough so that they produce enough power throughout the mission even with dust accumulation. For long duration missions go nuke and have it powered by an RTG, they really are the way to go. RTGs are unfortunately expensive, and fuel is getting scarce. The US has stopped production of Pu-238, and AFAIK the Russians are shutting theirs down as well. From what I understand, we have enough available for the currently planned missions but little beyond that. Thinking about panel cleaning, it seems to me you don't need to run it very frequently. From the MER experience, averaging once every 3 months would probably be plenty. If you only need a few tens of cycles total, simple filters may be sufficient to make Hendrics suggestion workable from a dust POV. You'd need to be able to isolate it (lock the valves closed and cover the filters), but that should fairly straightforward. OTOH, at that level of use an expendable source might be competitive. If you use something that is liquid or solid at modest pressures, you can get a large volume without wasting too much mass on pressure vessels. CO2 seems like the obvious choice, although you may have to expend some effort keeping it in the desired state. Larger panels are clearly the simpler (= lower technical risk) way, but being able to clean off after a major dust storm has a certain attraction. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd September 2024 - 01:42 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |