MSL schedule delay? |
MSL schedule delay? |
Sep 9 2008, 08:10 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 706 Joined: 22-April 05 Member No.: 351 |
The most recent Aviation Week and Space Technology (9/8) has the following tidbit in a piece on NASA schedule delays:
"On the robotoic front, the testing schedule for a critical instrument for the Mars Science Laboratory -- dubbed SAM for Sample Analysis at Mars -- may delay launch of the advanced rover from its 2009 planetary window into 2011." -------------------- |
|
|
Oct 30 2008, 09:25 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 706 Joined: 22-April 05 Member No.: 351 |
Alan Stern's thoughts on the MSL budget problems have been posted at http://futureplanets.blogspot.com/
-------------------- |
|
|
Oct 31 2008, 02:10 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2517 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
Alan Stern's thoughts on the MSL budget problems have been posted at http://futureplanets.blogspot.com/ From Stern's article: "When the National Research Council's Planetary Science Decadal Survey recommended the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) mission for priority funding, it assigned a cost level of $650 million." Feel free to read this report: http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=10898 and decide if it was ever intended to be the basis of real funding plans. IMHO it is disingenuous to cite the report for this purpose. Note that the report was written in 2003, well in advance of any MER results and long prior to the payload suite of MSL being selected. I don't even see where MSL was assigned "medium mission" status. The report explicitly assigns "large mission" (>$650M) for "preparation for Mars Sample Return". -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 7th June 2024 - 10:50 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |