Mars Science Lab Cameras |
Mars Science Lab Cameras |
Guest_Sunspot_* |
May 20 2004, 01:23 PM
Post
#1
|
Guests |
Has anyone any idea what kind of imaging system is being proposed for the MSL? Would it be the same or simiilar to the MER's, or as improved as the MER pancams are to those that were used on Pathfinder?
With a nuclear power source for the rover, and hopefully the mars telecoms orbiter in place the data rate and data volume could be phenomenal |
|
|
Nov 8 2008, 08:21 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3419 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Minneapolis, MN, USA Member No.: 15 |
The MER Navcam lenses (esp. Oppy's) have dust accumulations ranging from light to very heavy -- Oppy's are quite occluded on the right sides of the images. However, this isn't a result of general dust accumulation, it happened almost entirely during the global dust storm (which also deposited dust onto the "protected" optics of the mini-TES instruments on both MERs, enough that it might possibly render the devices useless).
I think there's a difference between designing optics to remain "as clean as possible" during normal accumulation cycles and designing dust-storm-proof optics. I'm positive that MSL's cameras are good for the former, but doubt they're designed to handle the latter. -the other Doug -------------------- “The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.” -Mark Twain
|
|
|
Nov 8 2008, 08:33 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 276 Joined: 11-December 07 From: Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Member No.: 3978 |
I think there's a difference between designing optics to remain "as clean as possible" during normal accumulation cycles and designing dust-storm-proof optics. I'm positive that MSL's cameras are good for the former, but doubt they're designed to handle the latter. -the other Doug Quite right. Aren't they concerned enough to make a mechanism for removing dust from the lenses? If I recall well, the Beagle 2 lander had a 'wiper' for each eye of its stereo imaging payload. Why on earth won't anyone consider such a thing? -------------------- |
|
|
Nov 8 2008, 08:39 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2517 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
Why on earth won't anyone consider such a thing? Because the cameras aren't on Earth. Designing a mechanism that can survive for many years under martian conditions and not fail in some way that degrades imaging is not worth it, given the low chance of dust contamination as I have already described. The cameras are normally stowed pointing down. Was there some period on MER when they were left pointing up? -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st June 2024 - 07:16 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |