Post-Conjunction at Home Plate North, Getting ready to leave |
Post-Conjunction at Home Plate North, Getting ready to leave |
Dec 15 2008, 07:12 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 2262 Joined: 9-February 04 From: Melbourne - Oz Member No.: 16 |
Conjunction is over, so it is probably a good time to start a new thread.
I just saw this update from Scott via Twitter QUOTE ('marsroverdriver') Out of solar conjunction & planning to drive Spirit again. Woo-hoo! Come on, little hill-climber, you can do it! -------------------- |
|
|
Dec 31 2008, 11:11 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 63 Joined: 18-November 08 Member No.: 4490 |
I was wondering - as you know, Spirit is trying to climb up a fairly steep slope. Looking at the direction of the dust streaks as it appears to "clear", could that be consistant with mechanical vibration aiding the clearance, or is that not possible - so this is purely the wind doing the work? To what extent could the clearing be an optical illusion - ie, when there is bright light fully reflected by the panels, they appear dusty, when not, the dusty patterns on the dark panels stand out..
Just my 2 cents.. |
|
|
Dec 31 2008, 11:43 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 206 Joined: 15-August 07 From: Shrewsbury, Shropshire Member No.: 3233 |
I was wondering if the dust movement was caused by a Marsquake.
|
|
|
Jan 1 2009, 12:15 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 293 Joined: 22-September 08 From: Spain Member No.: 4350 |
But Mars crust is dead, and probably a quake strong enough to shake the rover would make a lot of dust go airborne over Gusev.
A very small vibration can't be the solution, or that shaking mode they tried to clean the MiniTES mirror would have been enough. |
|
|
Jan 1 2009, 12:51 AM
Post
#5
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 206 Joined: 15-August 07 From: Shrewsbury, Shropshire Member No.: 3233 |
But Mars crust is dead, and probably a quake strong enough to shake the rover would make a lot of dust go airborne over Gusev. The Viking seismometer did not detect any Marsquakes. However as this abstract makes clear the seismometer was not very sensitive and only worked on none windy days: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979GeoRL...6..368G It is stated in this article that a picture taken by MRO may be evidence of a Marsquake: http://www.universetoday.com/2008/03/03/hi...ches-in-action/ |
|
|
Jan 1 2009, 08:41 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 293 Joined: 22-September 08 From: Spain Member No.: 4350 |
There must be a minimum seismic level the MER can directly sense if it tries to.
Would the vibration trigger the dust devil capture program if it was running (and would the microscope be able to capture movement if it was looking)? About the avalanches, I remember from high school geology that thermal expansion, abrasion, frost weathering, weight removal or even haloclastia or chemical weathering could be involved. |
|
|
Jan 1 2009, 11:56 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14448 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
There must be a minimum seismic level the MER can directly sense if it tries to. It has IMU's and Accelerometers, not Seismometers. This is an issue we've covered before here. Even if it detected shuddering from a DD (and indeed, there is about a pixels worth of shift at the summit of Husband Hill during strong winds) then by the time the rover had stopped doing whatever it was doing ( if indeed it has the power to be doing anything at that time anyway ) - it wouldn't even know which direction to point the Navcams to take an image of the DD that would be long gone anyway. The new software to do DD/Cloud watching is a far more sensible and productive means to achieve that sort of thing. Doug |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 31st October 2024 - 11:00 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |