Update on Mars' atmosphere, Media briefing on NASA Jan 15th |
Update on Mars' atmosphere, Media briefing on NASA Jan 15th |
Jan 12 2009, 06:01 PM
Post
#1
|
|
The Poet Dude Group: Moderator Posts: 5551 Joined: 15-March 04 From: Kendal, Cumbria, UK Member No.: 60 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Jan 18 2009, 02:24 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 98 Joined: 24-November 04 Member No.: 111 |
From Science Daily: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/...90115164621.htm
"We observed and mapped multiple plumes of methane on Mars, one of which released about 19,000 metric tons of methane," said co-author Geronimo Villanueva of the Catholic University of America in Washington. "The plumes were emitted during the warmer seasons, spring and summer, perhaps because ice blocking cracks and fissures vaporized, allowing methane to seep into the Martian air." I do wonder if the words ' plumes' and 'were emitted' bias the assumption of origin. I really do hope that the authors do find out in time that their words were chosen wisely! Of course if all that methane came from one or several vents during the warm season, that would be a HUGE amount ! But let me analyze it another way. From the maps of Mars with methane levels, let's assume that high signals for methane were found conservatively over about 10% of the Martian surface (it actually looks more like about 20+%). Assuming that methane is formed on about 10% of the Martian surface, and over a 90 day warm period, then the generation level is 13g/km^2/day, or about 0.000013 g / m^2/day. I do think this is not too much for a photochemical generation source. So I do wonder how a photochemical mechanism was dismissed as a source. I am very interested in reading this paper! Calculation: Mars surface area = 144 798 500 km˛ 19,000*2000/2.2 / (144798500*0.10) / 90 * 1000g = 13 g/km^2/day 13 /1000/1000 = 0.000013 g / m^2/day |
|
|
Jan 18 2009, 12:04 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 63 Joined: 18-November 08 Member No.: 4490 |
Assuming that methane is formed on about 10% of the Martian surface, and over a 90 day warm period, then the generation level is 13g/km^2/day, or about 0.000013 g / m^2/day. I do think this is not too much for a photochemical generation source. So I do wonder how a photochemical mechanism was dismissed as a source. I am very interested in reading this paper! Thats interesting - only 13g CH4/km2/day (1.3g/km2/day globally) - its not much to account for. Another possibility I havent seen mentioned yet is the formation of CH4 by Electrical activity within Dust Storms. There you have the energy input/heat plus the possible presence of catalysts in the dust, acting on atmospheric CO2 and traces of water: Directly: CO2 + 2H2O + Energy -> (With catalyst/intermediate reaction) CH4 + 2O2 Or acting with any Olivine within the dust (see Juramike's post here too): Indirectly: (Fe,Mg)2SiO4 + 4H2O + CO2 --> Mg3SiO5(OH4) + Fe3O4 + CH4 My question being: could lightning/electrostatic energy be another source of energy for this reaction - apart from volcanic heat/sunlight? Again, just a bit of speculation, YMMV. Feel free to laugh me out of court.. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 7th June 2024 - 12:46 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |