Deep Impact Realtime Thread |
Deep Impact Realtime Thread |
 Jul 4 2005, 04:52 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Founder  Group: Chairman Posts: 14449 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1  |
Well - impactor TCM 1 went well - <0.3% error and it's on course for a nominal impact time. PI has suggested that the comet is Banana shaped and we're going to hit the end of it which looks a little triangular
|
 |
 
|
 |
|
Jul 4 2005, 09:10 PM
Post
#2
|
||
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10258 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
Here I've tinkered with the brightness to see the terminator area better.
A lovely new world! Despite what A'Hearn said I think this is quite a lot like Borrelly in many respects - but we see it a lot better. It's VERY different from the weird Comet Wild-2, with its amazing spiky hills and scarps. The top is rotating towards us, meaning cometary north is to the right (the new IAU definition of north on objects like these). Note how the two smooth patches give the appearance of lying in the the central portions of broad shallow depressions. A proper shape model will be made later, so I hope it confirms this. Despite VP's comments, I don't have a problem interpreting the circular features as impact craters, though presumably if the artificial impact tells us anything it should be that natural impacts will trigger venting and the crater will evolve rapidly. But the dark shading VP mentions looks to me like the outer part of the rim on one side, and the inner part of the rim on the opposite side... it looks OK as a crater to me. Well, we'll see... I have my opinions, but I've been wrong before. (just ask my kids!) Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 4 2005, 10:06 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 81 Joined: 25-February 05 From: New Jersey Member No.: 177 |
Let me get this straight: they're not sure if they see the crater? The whole point of the mission was to look inside the crater to see the interior of the nucleus! Don't get me wrong, the nucleus photos are great and the impact photos are absolutely spectacular, but what about the science?
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 4 2005, 10:13 PM
Post
#4
|
|
 Member Group: Members Posts: 718 Joined: 3-December 04 From: Boulder, Colorado, USA Member No.: 117 |
QUOTE (MiniTES @ Jul 4 2005, 10:06 PM) Let me get this straight: they're not sure if they see the crater? The whole point of the mission was to look inside the crater to see the interior of the nucleus! Don't get me wrong, the nucleus photos are great and the impact photos are absolutely spectacular, but what about the science?  I don't think it's that bad- the main way they planned to see what was in the crater was to watch that stuff being blasted out into space, rather than look at what was left behind in the hole- they will have lots of data on what's inside the comet. But seeing the crater would tell a great deal about the strength of the nucleus and about impacts in general. If they can't see the crater through the the plume, it will be a disappointment, but not a disaster. |
|
|
|
|
Jul 4 2005, 10:20 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 81 Joined: 25-February 05 From: New Jersey Member No.: 177 |
QUOTE (john_s @ Jul 4 2005, 10:13 PM) I don't think it's that bad- the main way they planned to see what was in the crater was to watch that stuff being blasted out into space, rather than look at what was left behind in the hole- they will have lots of data on what's inside the comet. But seeing the crater would tell a great deal about the strength of the nucleus and about impacts in general. If they can't see the crater through the the plume, it will be a disappointment, but not a disaster. I see. I thought they wanted to see the layers of the interior of the comet in cross-section. Although it seems like the majority of the imaged are still being downlinked. -------------------- ----------------------------------------------
"Too low they build, who build beneath the stars." - Edward Young |
|
|
|
djellison Deep Impact Realtime Thread Jul 4 2005, 04:52 AM
djellison A rather rough and ready HRI picture on NASA TV - ... Jul 4 2005, 05:09 AM djellison TCM 2 is in progress - estimated to be 40ish secon... Jul 4 2005, 05:19 AM hendric Sounds like someone was concerned about microradia... Jul 4 2005, 05:20 AM hendric Somebody just got up and ran off..."I told yo... Jul 4 2005, 05:21 AM djellison I assume this is the calculated pointing error for... Jul 4 2005, 05:22 AM hendric Figures...Nasa TV is showing images of the HRI. ... Jul 4 2005, 05:23 AM deglr6328 Did I get that right? They're doing (near) rea... Jul 4 2005, 05:24 AM hendric Yep. On their laptops, no less. I guess Mike... Jul 4 2005, 05:28 AM djellison Yup "Two days"...lmfao - 60 seconds
Do... Jul 4 2005, 05:31 AM hendric holy...I thought the tv camera defocused, but thos... Jul 4 2005, 05:36 AM djellison For those with access - Sky News is carrying NTV a... Jul 4 2005, 05:36 AM djellison Last TCM calculations suggest again, 2ish m/sec
D... Jul 4 2005, 05:38 AM deglr6328 Final ITM (ITM 3) occurs in <3 min. As I unders... Jul 4 2005, 05:39 AM hendric "Near real time" my butt. The Image Vie... Jul 4 2005, 05:44 AM
Bob Shaw Good images of the nucleus - looks like a bent Enc... Jul 4 2005, 06:07 AM Bob Shaw A screengrab of the nucleus: Jul 4 2005, 06:15 AM djellison FInal burn manouver complete - accurate to within ... Jul 4 2005, 05:45 AM deglr6328 Final TCM burn error less than 1/4 of a %!... Jul 4 2005, 05:45 AM djellison 10 seconds to go Jul 4 2005, 05:51 AM djellison Loss of Signal Jul 4 2005, 05:52 AM djellison WOoooooooooooooooooooooooooo - the pictures
Doug Jul 4 2005, 05:52 AM djellison Wow - this is like ranger - amazing images coming... Jul 4 2005, 05:53 AM deglr6328 WOW! lovely!! they look far closer t... Jul 4 2005, 05:53 AM hendric Is that a crack?? My bet is for rubble pile!... Jul 4 2005, 05:55 AM djellison Is it wrong that I was celebrating WAYYY before th... Jul 4 2005, 05:57 AM deglr6328 It's perfect! Perfectly centered in the im... Jul 4 2005, 05:59 AM alan "doing very well for a spaceraft about to be ... Jul 4 2005, 06:03 AM lyford Doh - party's over here now.... Jul 4 2005, 06:03 AM djellison Just taking photographs of my TV here - with Sky N... Jul 4 2005, 06:04 AM lyford more here
http://www.scotsons-shack.com/dimages.h... Jul 4 2005, 06:05 AM lyford kitt peak working now
Kitt Peak Live Feed Jul 4 2005, 06:07 AM hendric Deep Impact II to hit an Asteroid? Jul 4 2005, 06:10 AM deglr6328 Sub-meter res images just before impact seem to sh... Jul 4 2005, 06:13 AM hendric Consdering they're compensating for a really l... Jul 4 2005, 06:14 AM djellison MRI of the impact.
I just have to go 'BOOOOoo... Jul 4 2005, 06:20 AM Bob Shaw Medium resolution image of the impact: Jul 4 2005, 06:25 AM Bob Shaw Doug:
Gonna send the Deep Impact Team a 'Gold... Jul 4 2005, 06:27 AM Sunspot Any reports of observations from the ground? Jul 4 2005, 06:21 AM lyford mirror of the pre impact animation from kitt peak
... Jul 4 2005, 06:27 AM Bob Shaw The final flyby picture before the 'hiding fro... Jul 4 2005, 06:32 AM garybeau The best 4th of July fireworks I ever witnessed. C... Jul 4 2005, 06:37 AM djellison The realtime image pages are healthily updated, bu... Jul 4 2005, 06:59 AM volcanopele Try:
http://pirlwww.lpl.arizona.edu/~perry/image... Jul 4 2005, 07:01 AM alan impact images now available on near real time imag... Jul 4 2005, 07:37 AM Sunspot http://www.spaceflightnow.com/deepimpact/050704fau... Jul 4 2005, 07:55 AM Jyril Faulkes Telescope images can be found here. Jul 4 2005, 07:56 AM deglr6328 Pre and post (~20 minutes) images from the Faulkes... Jul 4 2005, 08:04 AM jaredGalen What time GMT is the press conference on?
I don... Jul 4 2005, 08:09 AM dvandorn Now it's off of "Momentarily" and ba... Jul 4 2005, 08:11 AM jaredGalen QUOTE (jaredGalen @ Jul 4 2005, 09:09 AM)Edit... Jul 4 2005, 08:12 AM jaredGalen WOOOHOOO!!! Jul 4 2005, 08:13 AM jaredGalen Wow, more hits than Cassini and MER combined!
... Jul 4 2005, 08:15 AM Sunspot I think it should have started 10 minutes ago.
... Jul 4 2005, 08:11 AM Jyril It should start at any time now. They're havin... Jul 4 2005, 08:11 AM Jyril Here's a blog from Planetary Society for those... Jul 4 2005, 08:26 AM Tman Someone did a nice animation on web:
http://pla... Jul 4 2005, 08:50 AM abalone Still image from impactor. Impact point is in cent... Jul 4 2005, 09:08 AM Decepticon Did anyone get the reaction of the Deep Impact Tea... Jul 4 2005, 12:03 PM Marcel Before and after by Hubble
http://deepimpact.jpl.... Jul 4 2005, 12:52 PM ilbasso I heard the rep from ESA say that Rosetta was also... Jul 4 2005, 01:55 PM Tman There is an QT movie that shows most approach so f... Jul 4 2005, 03:30 PM volcanopele QUOTE (Tman @ Jul 4 2005, 08:30 AM)There is a... Jul 4 2005, 03:52 PM djellison It may be that it started to tumble / wobble with ... Jul 4 2005, 03:35 PM Jyril QUOTE (djellison @ Jul 4 2005, 06:35 PM)It ma... Jul 4 2005, 03:47 PM Jyril The hubble image posted earlier has been updated w... Jul 4 2005, 03:45 PM volcanopele http://pirlwww.lpl.arizona.edu/~perry/images/impac... Jul 4 2005, 04:04 PM Tman wow, you found likely the right impact spot! I... Jul 4 2005, 04:25 PM jaredGalen
Looks Like your spot on.
I overlayed the closeup ... Jul 4 2005, 05:59 PM jaredGalen In fact the last one seems to fit in too here.
Thi... Jul 4 2005, 06:11 PM Decepticon Cool animations!
This is a great press confe... Jul 4 2005, 06:24 PM djellison 1600GMT Press Conf Highlights
Web Hits : Last 24... Jul 4 2005, 06:25 PM Decepticon Are raw images available yet? Jul 4 2005, 06:31 PM alan Found a couple more matches in Tman's image Jul 4 2005, 06:36 PM jaredGalen QUOTE (alan @ Jul 4 2005, 07:36 PM)Found a co... Jul 4 2005, 06:48 PM Sunspot It doesn't look like there are any plans for a... Jul 4 2005, 06:48 PM MizarKey I loved the animated sequence showing the crater f... Jul 4 2005, 06:49 PM volcanopele I'm still finding it hard to believe think of ... Jul 4 2005, 07:01 PM MiniTES Trying to make sure I understand the geometry of t... Jul 4 2005, 11:35 PM Decepticon I though we would get better lookback images for m... Jul 5 2005, 12:10 AM Phil Stooke MiniTES, the brightest spot in the lookback image ... Jul 5 2005, 12:40 AM BruceMoomaw Actually, the scientific seriousness of the HRI fo... Jul 5 2005, 01:48 AM tedstryk Were the images taken after impact monochrome or m... Jul 5 2005, 02:23 AM MiniTES QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Jul 5 2005, 01:48 AM)...... Jul 5 2005, 02:38 AM BruceMoomaw To Ted: both the HRI and MRI images were multispec... Jul 5 2005, 02:40 AM MiniTES QUOTE (BruceMoomaw @ Jul 5 2005, 02:40 AM)To ... Jul 5 2005, 02:46 AM MiniTES I also think NASA could have milked the publicity ... Jul 5 2005, 03:07 AM BruceMoomaw To "Mini-TES": actually, your second sou... Jul 5 2005, 04:19 AM BruceMoomaw As for an extended mission to a second comet; I ca... Jul 5 2005, 04:21 AM BruceMoomaw And as for the impact being precisely on July 4 (w... Jul 5 2005, 04:29 AM BruceMoomaw And here, finally, is the only additional data I w... Jul 5 2005, 05:14 AM BruceMoomaw And here's a third one, which is useful in bei... Jul 5 2005, 05:23 AM slinted Bruce:
The pds site with the calibration data has... Jul 5 2005, 05:59 AM BruceMoomaw Splendid! Thanks. Jul 5 2005, 03:59 PM Tman Maybe you want to get a deeper look at the impact ... Jul 5 2005, 05:02 PM alan What small mound? Jul 5 2005, 05:17 PM |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th November 2024 - 06:07 PM |
|
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
|
