IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Where No Man, Rover, Nor Impactor Has Gone Before
MiniTES
post Jul 5 2005, 02:58 AM
Post #1


Junior Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 81
Joined: 25-February 05
From: New Jersey
Member No.: 177



How many of you here are Star Trek fans? I've loved watching the original for as long as I can remember.


--------------------
----------------------------------------------
"Too low they build, who build beneath the stars." - Edward Young
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
edstrick
post Jul 5 2005, 07:35 AM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1870
Joined: 20-February 05
Member No.: 174



My brother saw the Star Trek pilot "The Cage", presented by Gene Roddenberry at the Tricon World Science Fiction Convention in (I think, Cleveland) about 3 weeks before the series first aired. The fans, mostly literary SF fans, because this was before media fandom, gave Roddenberry a 10 minute standing ovation.

Star Trek, Original and subesequent series have all had major problems as being good Science Fiction. "Captain! The Gobbldygook Generator is a-busted! I dinna know if I can fix it afore the end of the episode!"....

But we tend to forget just how horrible the "Scifi" and "Skiffy" TV that passed for Science Fiction was and largely continued to be long past ST-TOS. Twilight Zone had class, but it was "Fantasy and Science Fiction", not at all hard science fiction. The Outer Limits presented some of the all time classic science fiction ideas on TV for the first time done well, but the series degenerated into the Monster or the Mad Scientist of the week. Otherwise, we had mostly Irwin Allen's hollywood-lame dumbass SciFi series: "Lost in Space", "Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea" "Land of the Giants", "Time Tunnel", and others. They all had good episodes, all had some redeaming qualities, especialy Time Tunnel <which looks forwards in some ways to Stargate>, but they really were drek.

Granted, they were better than Gerry Anderson's "Space 1899" <sic!> 1899 was the level of astronomical and scientific knowledge of the creators and writers. The idea of the series was wonderful, but the execution produced transcendentally lame Skiffy. They had utterly no idea of the difference between a solar system and a galaxy, etc.

Star Trek has had many problems, it is after all, not "hard science fiction", but Space Opera, and written science fiction has always been decades in advance of the best hollywood has made <and hollywood's product almost completely dominates all mass media discussions of Sf>, but Star Trek was indeed a great leap forwards for media Science Fiction.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Bob Shaw
post Jul 6 2005, 12:57 AM
Post #3


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2488
Joined: 17-April 05
From: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Member No.: 239



Although much TV SF was very poor (apart from Fireball XL5, a show without peer!) it's worth remembering the very fine radio material which was made in the 1950s (and later). Dimension X, X-Minus One and so on in the US featured sophisticated stories with excellent visuals (inside your head) and this tradition was perhaps exemplified in the Hitch-Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy, where Marvin was much more depressed-looking on the wireless than in the TV series or the recent movie!

I recently bought a bundle of old-time SF radio shows in MP3 format via eBay and have to say that I'm delighted with the purchase.


--------------------
Remember: Time Flies like the wind - but Fruit Flies like bananas!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- MiniTES   Where No Man, Rover, Nor Impactor Has Gone Before   Jul 5 2005, 02:58 AM
- - dilo   QUOTE (MiniTES @ Jul 5 2005, 02:58 AM)How man...   Jul 5 2005, 04:22 AM
- - MizarKey   I became a fan of Star Trek at 15. I remember cat...   Jul 5 2005, 07:10 AM
- - edstrick   My brother saw the Star Trek pilot "The Cage...   Jul 5 2005, 07:35 AM
|- - Bob Shaw   Although much TV SF was very poor (apart from Fire...   Jul 6 2005, 12:57 AM
- - Phil Stooke   Hey Bob, I saw Fireball XL5 too... yes, it was fun...   Jul 6 2005, 03:42 AM
|- - RedSky   QUOTE (Phil Stooke @ Jul 5 2005, 10:42 PM)Hey...   Jul 22 2005, 04:33 PM
- - edstrick   Since radio SF depended on words, not visuals, it ...   Jul 6 2005, 07:17 AM
|- - dvandorn   I grew up as a science fiction fan -- the town lib...   Jul 6 2005, 08:23 AM
|- - Bob Shaw   I think we're all demonstrating the old adage ...   Jul 6 2005, 11:49 AM
- - edstrick   I recently picked up a used boxed DVD set of the c...   Jul 6 2005, 08:57 AM
|- - MiniTES   QUOTE (edstrick @ Jul 6 2005, 08:57 AM)I rece...   Jul 6 2005, 09:21 PM
- - edstrick   Bob Shaw said: I think we're all demonstrating...   Jul 7 2005, 01:47 AM
|- - tedstryk   I must admit that I have never been able to stomac...   Jul 7 2005, 02:48 AM
|- - Bob Shaw   QUOTE (tedstryk @ Jul 7 2005, 03:48 AM)I must...   Jul 7 2005, 12:13 PM
- - ilbasso   I started off with Fireball XL-5, too. I have a b...   Jul 7 2005, 01:52 PM
|- - dvandorn   QUOTE (ilbasso @ Jul 7 2005, 08:52 AM)I was d...   Jul 8 2005, 07:03 AM
|- - Bob Shaw   So: Is *nobody* other than yours truly going to Wo...   Jul 23 2005, 01:02 AM
|- - Bob Shaw   For what it's worth, if any of you folk are at...   Aug 5 2005, 02:55 PM
|- - DDAVIS   [quote=Bob Shaw,Aug 5 2005, 02:55 PM] For what it...   Aug 5 2005, 10:07 PM
|- - Bob Shaw   Don: Sadly, the Real Bob Shaw died not long aft...   Aug 7 2005, 05:44 PM
- - edstrick   Gentlemen. You can't fight in here... This is...   Jul 8 2005, 04:45 AM
|- - dvandorn   Thank you, President Muffley. -the other Doug   Jul 8 2005, 06:51 AM
- - RedSky   ... Oh... and here's the memorable closing son...   Jul 22 2005, 04:41 PM
- - edstrick   "So: Is *nobody* other than yours truly going...   Jul 23 2005, 08:01 AM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st June 2024 - 11:50 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.