The western route, 5th leg after stop at Absecon / Reeds Bay |
The western route, 5th leg after stop at Absecon / Reeds Bay |
Jul 11 2009, 05:57 PM
Post
#1
|
||
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 4279 Joined: 19-April 05 From: .br at .es Member No.: 253 |
Time for a new thread.
After moving southwards for ages, the "detour" by the western path has started with a 60+ meters drive on sol 1942. There are no images yet --they should be available on the next update-- so this image was calculated solely based on the rover's mobility info. I'll update the route map later. |
|
|
||
Jul 29 2009, 11:33 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1045 Joined: 17-February 09 Member No.: 4605 |
On this sandblasted plane Block Island is large enough to have caused local wind variations and isn't it possible that the larger ripples in the immediate area could be attributable to this rather than crater remnants? If BI is ejecta rather than an asteroidal meteorite then the impact could well have been at terminal velocity for Mars or less. No more than 1 km/s? That wouldn't punch a particularly large hole. We could even be looking at ejecta from Victoria. So even if it does have the composition of an iron meteorite, if it is a fragment spalled from the Victoria meteorite on impact it would again have hit at less than terminal velocity.
If it is a Victoria impactor fragment spalled on impact and ejected does that make it ejecta or meteorite? |
|
|
Jul 30 2009, 01:24 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2173 Joined: 28-December 04 From: Florida, USA Member No.: 132 |
...if it is a fragment spalled from the Victoria meteorite on impact.... My impression is that Victoria is too old for anything spalled from it's impactor to be lying on the current surface. Weren't we speculating a while back that Victoria* was formed before the hundreds of meters of sediment that Opportunity is traveling over were laid down? *edit: Oops, getting my craters mixed up.. That was Endeavor. But the speculation on Victoria was that it was so old that it has been covered over and uncovered by deposition and erosion, still making it impossible that the current surface could be the surface on which part of it's impactor fell. |
|
|
Jul 30 2009, 01:44 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8784 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
...has been covered over and uncovered by deposition and erosion... Actually, I think that's really the key concept to understanding the Meridiani meteorites. It doesn't seem like we see much exposed bedrock aside from regions near craters or between dunes. I get the impression that the environment is similar in one respect to Antarctica or glacier tops: the surface gets buried & exhumed periodically, and quite often what isn't sand or snow turns out to be meteoritic. If this model's true, then these meteorites are probably all one-shot unrelated objects & not secondary artifacts of larger impacts. -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 8th June 2024 - 01:43 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |