Mercury Flyby 3 |
Mercury Flyby 3 |
Jul 3 2009, 09:27 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1018 Joined: 29-November 05 From: Seattle, WA, USA Member No.: 590 |
We're now just one Mercury year (88 days) from flyby #3, which happens on September 29, 2009, so this seems like a good time to start a thread about it.
http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/index.php For comparison purposes, it'd be nice if someone (probably someone on the Messenger team) put together a Mercury Map showing what areas will get better coverage from this flyby than from the previous ones. I realize it'll be very similar to flyby #1, but it won't be exactly the same. After that, it's a long wait until MOI on March 18, 2011. Curiously, that's the same date the New Horizons crosses the orbit of Uranus. http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/mission/passingpla...ets_current.php --Greg |
|
|
Sep 21 2009, 06:15 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1018 Joined: 29-November 05 From: Seattle, WA, USA Member No.: 590 |
James Leary has discussed a possible extended mission:
http://www.nasa.gov/missions/highlights/we...transcript.html However, all he said was that they mght get the spacecraft into a slightly lower orbit so as to get slightly better pictures. He didn't suggest that Messenger would ultimately impact Mercury. Solomon's "Mercury After Messenger" is a very cool read all by itself, and he suggets an XM for Messenger might be just a single Earth year: http://www.spacepolicyonline.com/pages/ima...n_MESSENGER.pdf Despite the title, it's mostly about what Messenger will do at Mercury, but it suggests that after Messenger and Bepi-Colombo, there won't be a lot gained by another orbiter. The next step would have to be a lander or sample-return mission. --Greg |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st November 2024 - 12:02 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |