IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

How Much Driving Time?
Cugel
post Jul 18 2005, 04:03 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 153
Joined: 11-December 04
Member No.: 120



Does anybody know how much time Oppy actually can spend on driving on a single sol?

I remember that when she travelled from Eagle to Endurance crater it was no more than 1.5 hours per sol (or so), due to power limitations. I have no idea what the current power situation and battery status of Oppy allows these days...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
Cugel
post Jul 18 2005, 09:22 PM
Post #2


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 153
Joined: 11-December 04
Member No.: 120



Thanks all!

So, if I got this right, with nuclear power instead of solar, we could probably drive all day long (?). This means that MSL, even with the same speed as MER, could travel substantially further, up to 1 km. a day. Of course, if the terrain and software permit it...

Well, I still like those solar panel wings! An elegant idea, living of local resources, and it gives the rovers such a cute appearance. I bet that in a space probe beauty contest they would win by some margin. (Sojourner at 2?).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Nirgal
post Jul 19 2005, 12:01 AM
Post #3


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 713
Joined: 30-March 05
Member No.: 223



QUOTE (Cugel @ Jul 18 2005, 11:22 PM)
Well, I still like those solar panel wings! An elegant idea, living of local resources, and it gives the rovers such a cute appearance. I bet that in a space probe beauty contest they would win by some margin. (Sojourner at 2?).
*


it would be the *perfect* design if it also included some cleaning mechnism to prevent dust accumulation on the panels.
This would mean virtually unlimited exploration during the course of many years and over great distances.
Especially if combined with massive redundancy and simlpicity/robustness against hardware failures or wear/tear: think of, say 10 MER-like self-cleaning-solar-panel powered rovers distributed all over the planet ...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Marcel
post Jul 19 2005, 07:16 AM
Post #4


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 290
Joined: 26-March 04
From: Edam, The Netherlands
Member No.: 65



QUOTE (Nirgal @ Jul 19 2005, 12:01 AM)
it would be the *perfect* design if it also included some cleaning mechnism to prevent dust accumulation on the panels.
*

This actually was an issue discussed before in a thread that i forgot what title it had. It has been under consideration by rover builders to try to incorporate some mechanism or system that takes care of a clean solar array for the long run. It seems so stupid that it wasn't built in (was my first idea). Especially because it seems like the most probable cause of rover-death in the end. However, it is not as easy as you (and I before) think.

First of all: NO one expected both of the vehicles to be fully operational after this long. They were designed to last 90 sols and 600 meters of driving distance. Taking this period of time in mind (and the experience of dust accumulation on MPF), there wasn't any concern about the dust. "Probably something else will finish them", must have been the consideration.
Secondly: there's been some research on solar arrays that repulse (is that english?) fines from the arrays by means of electromagnetic forces (and make use of the mineral magnetite abundance in the fines). This hasn't been studied thoroughly enough to be incorporated in the MER design however and also costs a lot of energy. There's also other ways to do it, like incorporate a "rolling foil" that renews itself like an expensive hotel "toilet seat hygienic system", however, this would be far too complicated to fit in because of the folded up configuration combined with the treamendous amount of obstacles on the rover deck (antennas, mast, TES target, magnets, pyro's, wires, sundial). One could think of a pressurized vessel with inert gas (like nitrogen or a noble gas) that could blow the arrays clean every now and then: this idea is nice but has the same problem as most of the others: it is simply too heavy to fit in AND to complex to integrate with the design......

Let our minds keep on cracking this issue until someone calls "Eureka" and finds something that really keeps them clean forever.... rolleyes.gif That would certainly maximize the amount of available driving time each sol....until something else breaks.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jeff7
post Jul 19 2005, 12:25 PM
Post #5


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 477
Joined: 2-March 05
Member No.: 180



QUOTE (Marcel @ Jul 19 2005, 02:16 AM)
Let our minds keep on cracking this issue until someone calls "Eureka" and finds something that really keeps them clean forever.... rolleyes.gif  That would certainly maximize the amount of available driving time each sol....until something else breaks.
*



How about a way of simply tilting the rover? Like maybe rear it up on 4 wheels so it's angled into the wind? Spirit probably got cleaned because it was angled while sitting on the hills. Look at Opportunity though. It's on flat terrain, and last I knew (long time ago) was that its output started dropping once it left the tilted ground of Endurance crater. Maybe just rearing it up, angling it slightly against the wind, would allow it to get a cleaning.
If the computer animation of the rover's landing and egress process is accurate, the rovers already have some capability to do this - it had to stand on the back 4 wheels while the front two unfolded from their stowed positions.

QUOTE
What's mute mean ?

I believe the term sought was "moot point."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Cugel   How Much Driving Time?   Jul 18 2005, 04:03 PM
- - djellison   About the same - perhaps a little less. Remember ...   Jul 18 2005, 04:17 PM
- - RNeuhaus   I guess that the driving speed will be much slower...   Jul 18 2005, 05:04 PM
|- - helvick   Peak theoretical insolation would have been around...   Jul 18 2005, 05:36 PM
|- - Nirgal   there was a very interesting analysis of the Rover...   Jul 18 2005, 07:35 PM
- - Cugel   Thanks all! So, if I got this right, with nuc...   Jul 18 2005, 09:22 PM
|- - RNeuhaus   QUOTE (Cugel @ Jul 18 2005, 04:22 PM)Thanks a...   Jul 18 2005, 09:30 PM
|- - Nirgal   QUOTE (Cugel @ Jul 18 2005, 11:22 PM)Well, I ...   Jul 19 2005, 12:01 AM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (Nirgal @ Jul 19 2005, 12:01 AM)it woul...   Jul 19 2005, 07:16 AM
|- - Jeff7   QUOTE (Marcel @ Jul 19 2005, 02:16 AM)Let our...   Jul 19 2005, 12:25 PM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (Jeff7 @ Jul 19 2005, 12:25 PM)If the c...   Jul 19 2005, 12:51 PM
|- - abalone   QUOTE (Marcel @ Jul 19 2005, 11:51 PM)maybe a...   Jul 19 2005, 01:17 PM
|- - um3k   QUOTE (Marcel @ Jul 19 2005, 08:51 AM)By the ...   Jul 19 2005, 02:49 PM
- - mike   It would be nice if people at large weren't so...   Jul 18 2005, 10:15 PM
|- - jaredGalen   Todays flight director report mentions that the po...   Jul 18 2005, 11:38 PM
- - djellison   Basically the mass, volume and money spent on a sy...   Jul 19 2005, 07:54 AM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (djellison @ Jul 19 2005, 07:54 AM)Basi...   Jul 19 2005, 08:22 AM
- - djellison   A combo of RTG's and Solar Arrays doesnt make ...   Jul 19 2005, 08:32 AM
- - edstrick   Every time you wish for a solar panel cleaning sys...   Jul 19 2005, 08:36 AM
|- - Nirgal   QUOTE (edstrick @ Jul 19 2005, 10:36 AM)Every...   Jul 19 2005, 09:08 AM
|- - dvandorn   A "windscreen wiper" (or "windshiel...   Jul 19 2005, 09:55 AM
|- - Marcel   Right, i agree on almost everything said. Except: ...   Jul 19 2005, 10:07 AM
|- - dvandorn   It's not necessarily linear -- the easiest way...   Jul 19 2005, 10:48 AM
- - edstrick   "Simple".... Only if the configuration o...   Jul 19 2005, 09:38 AM
- - edstrick   AMEN-squared with DVandorn's comments. The ro...   Jul 19 2005, 10:54 AM
|- - Marcel   We were talking about trying to find a simple, pos...   Jul 19 2005, 11:31 AM
|- - akuo   QUOTE (Marcel @ Jul 19 2005, 11:31 AM)It...   Jul 19 2005, 11:47 AM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (akuo @ Jul 19 2005, 11:47 AM)Yes. The ...   Jul 19 2005, 12:08 PM
- - djellison   Are you suggesting shot-blasting the solar arrays ...   Jul 19 2005, 11:51 AM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (djellison @ Jul 19 2005, 11:51 AM)Are ...   Jul 19 2005, 12:15 PM
- - Analyst   QUOTE If the computer animation of the rover's...   Jul 19 2005, 12:33 PM
- - djellison   And look at the power trend - essentially sustaina...   Jul 19 2005, 01:18 PM
|- - AoftheN   A simple dust removal mechanism maybe isn't su...   Jul 19 2005, 01:30 PM
- - djellison   To enable the IDD to reach the whole of the solar ...   Jul 19 2005, 01:36 PM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (djellison @ Jul 19 2005, 01:36 PM)To e...   Jul 19 2005, 01:54 PM
|- - Edward Schmitz   QUOTE (Marcel @ Jul 19 2005, 06:54 AM)...It m...   Jul 19 2005, 02:15 PM
- - Analyst   If there is no sun at all (in northern winter), yo...   Jul 19 2005, 02:12 PM
- - Bill Harris   QUOTE it will accumulate dust anyway: just like si...   Jul 19 2005, 02:26 PM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Jul 19 2005, 02:26 PM)Ar...   Jul 19 2005, 02:35 PM
- - RNeuhaus   Interesting discussions about different options on...   Jul 19 2005, 02:49 PM
|- - rschare   Isn't this all kind of a moot point? I thou...   Jul 19 2005, 05:13 PM
|- - helvick   The "To Clean or Not To Clean" discussio...   Jul 19 2005, 07:03 PM
|- - tedstryk   QUOTE (helvick @ Jul 19 2005, 07:03 PM)Phoeni...   Jul 20 2005, 12:40 PM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (tedstryk @ Jul 20 2005, 12:40 PM)True....   Jul 20 2005, 12:58 PM
|- - um3k   QUOTE (tedstryk @ Jul 20 2005, 08:40 AM)True....   Jul 20 2005, 03:23 PM
- - glennwsmith   I didn't intend to jump into this discussion a...   Jul 20 2005, 05:35 AM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (glennwsmith @ Jul 20 2005, 05:35 AM)I ...   Jul 20 2005, 06:06 AM
|- - djellison   QUOTE (glennwsmith @ Jul 20 2005, 05:35 AM)At...   Jul 20 2005, 07:14 AM
- - edstrick   The dust is finer than talcum powder, way way too ...   Jul 20 2005, 08:05 AM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (edstrick @ Jul 20 2005, 08:05 AM)The d...   Jul 20 2005, 09:27 AM
|- - Jeff7   QUOTE (Marcel @ Jul 20 2005, 04:27 AM)I don...   Jul 20 2005, 03:39 PM
- - djellison   3360 Whrs - is a lot more than MER Doug   Jul 20 2005, 09:28 AM
- - RNeuhaus   About how much time driving will have MERx? No one...   Jul 20 2005, 05:16 PM
|- - ToSeek   QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Jul 20 2005, 05:16 PM)Oppy ...   Jul 20 2005, 08:14 PM
||- - um3k   QUOTE (ToSeek @ Jul 20 2005, 04:14 PM)Not rea...   Jul 20 2005, 08:26 PM
|||- - Jeff7   QUOTE (um3k @ Jul 20 2005, 03:26 PM)That soun...   Jul 21 2005, 03:34 PM
||- - RNeuhaus   QUOTE (ToSeek @ Jul 20 2005, 03:14 PM)Not rea...   Jul 20 2005, 08:35 PM
||- - tty   QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Jul 20 2005, 10:35 PM)7) wh...   Jul 20 2005, 09:04 PM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Jul 20 2005, 05:16 PM)I thi...   Jul 21 2005, 01:43 PM
|- - RNeuhaus   QUOTE (Marcel @ Jul 21 2005, 08:43 AM)What an...   Jul 21 2005, 06:55 PM
- - Burmese   The rovers are funded thru September 2006 (just pa...   Jul 20 2005, 05:49 PM
- - mike   I think the rovers will last forever. Go on, prov...   Jul 20 2005, 07:38 PM
|- - ljk4-1   QUOTE (mike @ Jul 20 2005, 02:38 PM)I think t...   Jul 20 2005, 07:48 PM
- - tty   A note on the dangerous RTG's. They are pretty...   Jul 20 2005, 08:32 PM
- - edstrick   Um3k asked, regarding Phoenix: "They will at ...   Jul 21 2005, 07:46 AM
- - um3k   Thank you for your reply, edstrick. It was very in...   Jul 21 2005, 02:29 PM
- - Gonzz   From the Steven Sqyres update: "Oh yeah, and...   Jul 22 2005, 06:51 AM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (Gonzz @ Jul 22 2005, 06:51 AM)From the...   Jul 22 2005, 07:10 AM
- - edstrick   " So we are speculating what is the weakest p...   Jul 22 2005, 09:19 AM
- - Burmese   I see Steve's thoughts on the scenery in Merid...   Jul 22 2005, 12:55 PM
- - Bob Shaw   An interesting .PDF paper on the design criteria f...   Aug 17 2005, 08:42 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th June 2024 - 01:55 PM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.