IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

How Much Driving Time?
Cugel
post Jul 18 2005, 04:03 PM
Post #1


Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 153
Joined: 11-December 04
Member No.: 120



Does anybody know how much time Oppy actually can spend on driving on a single sol?

I remember that when she travelled from Eagle to Endurance crater it was no more than 1.5 hours per sol (or so), due to power limitations. I have no idea what the current power situation and battery status of Oppy allows these days...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
RNeuhaus
post Jul 19 2005, 02:49 PM
Post #2


Senior Member
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1636
Joined: 9-May 05
From: Lima, Peru
Member No.: 385



Interesting discussions about different options on how to improve the power of array solars in order to avoid in using the heavy and "relatively" dangerous RTG.

What happens if there is a planetary dust storm that might last a long time?
- The Sun power will be more restringued during these days. The RTG is favored
for this situation.

On the other hand, about my comments about on this topic:

1) Windshield. Forget it. It need water to clean away perfectly the sun power panels.
2) Raising to vertical position and shake the wings sun power. Extra weight due the adding electrical motors to raise and also to shake wings.
3) Martian air compressor. The best solution for its simplicity and about the weight, it might be lower than the option 2.
4) Go for a zone of dust devils and wait of being hit. Never know when! and not all place has dust devils. (Gusev has most often dust devil than Meridiani Planum). Not good solution.
5) Look for some big stone and climb on it so that its position is, as an example, 40 degree of inclination and turn an vibration engine to shake off the dust. Not as effective as the solution 2 but it add less weight to the rover.

Anyway, I think that the best solutions to extend the power supply are not only of one idea but any more ideas:

1) On the surface of the sun power must have some kind of magnifying optical in order to absorbe more light and hence provide more sun power. I am not sure of that this idea is valid. The magnifying optical concentrates the tenue light ino an radius of strong linumination. But I doubt the result would be the same for both ways.

2) As the Martian has wind, the top of mast must have some kind of helix. The martian is somewhat windy (around 10 m/s on the surface). It might add some weight to Rover but in some places, it would be very helpful to provide "aeolein???" power (air power). I doubt if that solution might be effective since the martian air is so light to push the helix to rotate...some very light material and very low friction, it might be rotating and thus hope to provide some few worths of wats/hour.

Rodolfo
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rschare
post Jul 19 2005, 05:13 PM
Post #3


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 7
Joined: 19-July 05
Member No.: 444



Isn't this all kind of a moot point?

I thought that the batteries only have a maximum number of charges they can handle (and we're coming up on that limit soon). So, even if you could get a cleaning of the array's, and a larger electrical charge, the batteries are eventually going to die anyway.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
helvick
post Jul 19 2005, 07:03 PM
Post #4


Dublin Correspondent
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1799
Joined: 28-March 05
From: Celbridge, Ireland
Member No.: 220



The "To Clean or Not To Clean" discussion again. :-)

Just remember that the primary mission objective was 90 days with only the very optimistic thinking even one rover would survive twice that long. The best estimates they had at design time showed they should have been getting into serious power budget problems at around Sol 200-250. And they did - Spirit hit rock bottom at that stage (288 Watt hours on Sol 204), Opportunity fared better because it was sheltered in Endurance and angled nicely for optimum solar power but still dropped below 450 watt hours in mid winter. Every kilo spent on a cleaning system would have impacted somewhere else, maybe fewer cameras, less mobility, no mossbauer or what ever. I really think the design trade offs that were made were excellent and the fact that the rovers are still operating after 500+ sols is an amazing achievement.

SS's latest comments about the Mossbauer's Cobalt-57 gamma ray source [half life of 271 days] shows that many of the non mechanical components are destined to continually degrade and a lifetime of 500+ Sols was really on the outer limits of anything they thought would be achievable. It's been pointed out before that the Li-ion batteries probably have a useful life of no more than 1000 charge cycles and that might be the thing that finally does them in.

Vertical\Sun tracking arrays have been considered, This study goes into a lot of detail on the factors being considered for a Polar Rover .

Phoenix is a short term mission being done on the cheap with already proven technology- I don't think any amount of gymnastics with solar arrays is going to allow it to last much beyond it's 90 sol primary mission and would add both cost and risk with no benifit - 70 days or so after the end of the primary mission it's going to be in near darkness 24.66 hours per sol and solidly frozen.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tedstryk
post Jul 20 2005, 12:40 PM
Post #5


Interplanetary Dumpster Diver
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 4404
Joined: 17-February 04
From: Powell, TN
Member No.: 33



QUOTE (helvick @ Jul 19 2005, 07:03 PM)
Phoenix is a short term mission being done on the cheap with already proven technology- I don't think any amount of gymnastics with solar arrays is going to allow it to last much beyond it's 90 sol primary mission and would add both cost and risk with no benifit - 70 days or so after the end of the primary mission it's going to be in near darkness 24.66 hours per sol and solidly frozen.
*


True. While there is a slim chance it might wake up after the winter, this highly, highly unlikely.


--------------------
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic
- Cugel   How Much Driving Time?   Jul 18 2005, 04:03 PM
- - djellison   About the same - perhaps a little less. Remember ...   Jul 18 2005, 04:17 PM
- - RNeuhaus   I guess that the driving speed will be much slower...   Jul 18 2005, 05:04 PM
|- - helvick   Peak theoretical insolation would have been around...   Jul 18 2005, 05:36 PM
|- - Nirgal   there was a very interesting analysis of the Rover...   Jul 18 2005, 07:35 PM
- - Cugel   Thanks all! So, if I got this right, with nuc...   Jul 18 2005, 09:22 PM
|- - RNeuhaus   QUOTE (Cugel @ Jul 18 2005, 04:22 PM)Thanks a...   Jul 18 2005, 09:30 PM
|- - Nirgal   QUOTE (Cugel @ Jul 18 2005, 11:22 PM)Well, I ...   Jul 19 2005, 12:01 AM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (Nirgal @ Jul 19 2005, 12:01 AM)it woul...   Jul 19 2005, 07:16 AM
|- - Jeff7   QUOTE (Marcel @ Jul 19 2005, 02:16 AM)Let our...   Jul 19 2005, 12:25 PM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (Jeff7 @ Jul 19 2005, 12:25 PM)If the c...   Jul 19 2005, 12:51 PM
|- - abalone   QUOTE (Marcel @ Jul 19 2005, 11:51 PM)maybe a...   Jul 19 2005, 01:17 PM
|- - um3k   QUOTE (Marcel @ Jul 19 2005, 08:51 AM)By the ...   Jul 19 2005, 02:49 PM
- - mike   It would be nice if people at large weren't so...   Jul 18 2005, 10:15 PM
|- - jaredGalen   Todays flight director report mentions that the po...   Jul 18 2005, 11:38 PM
- - djellison   Basically the mass, volume and money spent on a sy...   Jul 19 2005, 07:54 AM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (djellison @ Jul 19 2005, 07:54 AM)Basi...   Jul 19 2005, 08:22 AM
- - djellison   A combo of RTG's and Solar Arrays doesnt make ...   Jul 19 2005, 08:32 AM
- - edstrick   Every time you wish for a solar panel cleaning sys...   Jul 19 2005, 08:36 AM
|- - Nirgal   QUOTE (edstrick @ Jul 19 2005, 10:36 AM)Every...   Jul 19 2005, 09:08 AM
|- - dvandorn   A "windscreen wiper" (or "windshiel...   Jul 19 2005, 09:55 AM
|- - Marcel   Right, i agree on almost everything said. Except: ...   Jul 19 2005, 10:07 AM
|- - dvandorn   It's not necessarily linear -- the easiest way...   Jul 19 2005, 10:48 AM
- - edstrick   "Simple".... Only if the configuration o...   Jul 19 2005, 09:38 AM
- - edstrick   AMEN-squared with DVandorn's comments. The ro...   Jul 19 2005, 10:54 AM
|- - Marcel   We were talking about trying to find a simple, pos...   Jul 19 2005, 11:31 AM
|- - akuo   QUOTE (Marcel @ Jul 19 2005, 11:31 AM)It...   Jul 19 2005, 11:47 AM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (akuo @ Jul 19 2005, 11:47 AM)Yes. The ...   Jul 19 2005, 12:08 PM
- - djellison   Are you suggesting shot-blasting the solar arrays ...   Jul 19 2005, 11:51 AM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (djellison @ Jul 19 2005, 11:51 AM)Are ...   Jul 19 2005, 12:15 PM
- - Analyst   QUOTE If the computer animation of the rover's...   Jul 19 2005, 12:33 PM
- - djellison   And look at the power trend - essentially sustaina...   Jul 19 2005, 01:18 PM
|- - AoftheN   A simple dust removal mechanism maybe isn't su...   Jul 19 2005, 01:30 PM
- - djellison   To enable the IDD to reach the whole of the solar ...   Jul 19 2005, 01:36 PM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (djellison @ Jul 19 2005, 01:36 PM)To e...   Jul 19 2005, 01:54 PM
|- - Edward Schmitz   QUOTE (Marcel @ Jul 19 2005, 06:54 AM)...It m...   Jul 19 2005, 02:15 PM
- - Analyst   If there is no sun at all (in northern winter), yo...   Jul 19 2005, 02:12 PM
- - Bill Harris   QUOTE it will accumulate dust anyway: just like si...   Jul 19 2005, 02:26 PM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (Bill Harris @ Jul 19 2005, 02:26 PM)Ar...   Jul 19 2005, 02:35 PM
- - RNeuhaus   Interesting discussions about different options on...   Jul 19 2005, 02:49 PM
|- - rschare   Isn't this all kind of a moot point? I thou...   Jul 19 2005, 05:13 PM
|- - helvick   The "To Clean or Not To Clean" discussio...   Jul 19 2005, 07:03 PM
|- - tedstryk   QUOTE (helvick @ Jul 19 2005, 07:03 PM)Phoeni...   Jul 20 2005, 12:40 PM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (tedstryk @ Jul 20 2005, 12:40 PM)True....   Jul 20 2005, 12:58 PM
|- - um3k   QUOTE (tedstryk @ Jul 20 2005, 08:40 AM)True....   Jul 20 2005, 03:23 PM
- - glennwsmith   I didn't intend to jump into this discussion a...   Jul 20 2005, 05:35 AM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (glennwsmith @ Jul 20 2005, 05:35 AM)I ...   Jul 20 2005, 06:06 AM
|- - djellison   QUOTE (glennwsmith @ Jul 20 2005, 05:35 AM)At...   Jul 20 2005, 07:14 AM
- - edstrick   The dust is finer than talcum powder, way way too ...   Jul 20 2005, 08:05 AM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (edstrick @ Jul 20 2005, 08:05 AM)The d...   Jul 20 2005, 09:27 AM
|- - Jeff7   QUOTE (Marcel @ Jul 20 2005, 04:27 AM)I don...   Jul 20 2005, 03:39 PM
- - djellison   3360 Whrs - is a lot more than MER Doug   Jul 20 2005, 09:28 AM
- - RNeuhaus   About how much time driving will have MERx? No one...   Jul 20 2005, 05:16 PM
|- - ToSeek   QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Jul 20 2005, 05:16 PM)Oppy ...   Jul 20 2005, 08:14 PM
||- - um3k   QUOTE (ToSeek @ Jul 20 2005, 04:14 PM)Not rea...   Jul 20 2005, 08:26 PM
|||- - Jeff7   QUOTE (um3k @ Jul 20 2005, 03:26 PM)That soun...   Jul 21 2005, 03:34 PM
||- - RNeuhaus   QUOTE (ToSeek @ Jul 20 2005, 03:14 PM)Not rea...   Jul 20 2005, 08:35 PM
||- - tty   QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Jul 20 2005, 10:35 PM)7) wh...   Jul 20 2005, 09:04 PM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (RNeuhaus @ Jul 20 2005, 05:16 PM)I thi...   Jul 21 2005, 01:43 PM
|- - RNeuhaus   QUOTE (Marcel @ Jul 21 2005, 08:43 AM)What an...   Jul 21 2005, 06:55 PM
- - Burmese   The rovers are funded thru September 2006 (just pa...   Jul 20 2005, 05:49 PM
- - mike   I think the rovers will last forever. Go on, prov...   Jul 20 2005, 07:38 PM
|- - ljk4-1   QUOTE (mike @ Jul 20 2005, 02:38 PM)I think t...   Jul 20 2005, 07:48 PM
- - tty   A note on the dangerous RTG's. They are pretty...   Jul 20 2005, 08:32 PM
- - edstrick   Um3k asked, regarding Phoenix: "They will at ...   Jul 21 2005, 07:46 AM
- - um3k   Thank you for your reply, edstrick. It was very in...   Jul 21 2005, 02:29 PM
- - Gonzz   From the Steven Sqyres update: "Oh yeah, and...   Jul 22 2005, 06:51 AM
|- - Marcel   QUOTE (Gonzz @ Jul 22 2005, 06:51 AM)From the...   Jul 22 2005, 07:10 AM
- - edstrick   " So we are speculating what is the weakest p...   Jul 22 2005, 09:19 AM
- - Burmese   I see Steve's thoughts on the scenery in Merid...   Jul 22 2005, 12:55 PM
- - Bob Shaw   An interesting .PDF paper on the design criteria f...   Aug 17 2005, 08:42 PM


Reply to this topicStart new topic

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd September 2024 - 06:59 AM
RULES AND GUIDELINES
Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting.

IMAGE COPYRIGHT
Images posted on UnmannedSpaceflight.com may be copyrighted. Do not reproduce without permission. Read here for further information on space images and copyright.

OPINIONS AND MODERATION
Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators.
SUPPORT THE FORUM
Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member.