New Pluto images discussed |
New Pluto images discussed |
Feb 2 2010, 10:23 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
Telecon announcement (via Jupiter List - thanks)
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/jupiter_list/message/8170 |
|
|
Feb 3 2010, 07:28 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 796 Joined: 27-February 08 From: Heart of Europe Member No.: 4057 |
Are you sure? Comparing the images of Jupiter from WFPC2 and 3, it sure looked a whole lot more detailed. Yes, but Pluto images were taken by FOC camera. But I looked at pixel sizes in Emily's article and ACS HRC is quite comparable to FOC in term of resolution and spectral range. Now I don't know precisely resolution of original FOC images of Pluto, but when I say ~0.25 arcsec, it's very close to it (FOC pixel size was 0.014 arcsec and original images was taken at wavelength 278 nm). ACS HRC has 0.028 x 0.025 arcsec pixel size and UV capability, so images with approximately same resolution and better contrast are possible. -------------------- |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st November 2024 - 12:03 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |