Dawn Cruise |
Dawn Cruise |
Sep 27 2007, 12:31 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 100 Joined: 11-October 04 From: Oxford, UK (Glasgow by birth) Member No.: 101 |
Pushing out of Earth orbit now...........
-------------------- "There are 10 types of people in the world - those who understand binary code, and those who don't."
|
|
|
Mar 7 2010, 08:51 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 340 Joined: 11-April 08 From: Sydney, Australia Member No.: 4093 |
Received a kind and very detailed email from Marc Rayman which answers quite a few questions raised regarding Vesta arrival and subsequent science orbits. Main focus is that all these information pertain to planned and reference orbits etc. Reality will be different because of so many unknowns at Vesta. His email, slightly edited ...
QUOTE We have constraints on the orbit we want to achieve based on the plans for acquiring and returning the data, but the details will depend on Vesta's gravity field and higher order gravity terms. So I hope you understand the 3003 x 2994 km orbit is just our current design. As I wrote in my latest Dawn Journal, we are beginning the detailed sequence design, and this is the reference orbit we use, but we are making the design tolerant to significant changes that will be dictated by what we find there. Planning for orbital operations at a massive body with a highly uncertain gravity field is very complicated. That first orbit is called "survey orbit." The first ~ 5 days we are there will be used to tweak the sequences based on the actual orbit, updates to instrument parameters (e.g., integration times based on data acquired during approach), etc. With our current design, the next science orbit will be at a radius of 950 km, and the third and lowest science orbit will be at a radius of about 460 km. Of course, we will not proceed from one orbit to the next without verifying we can do so safely, but unless we discover a problem, we will not change our plans once we are at Vesta. We will not choose to go to a lower orbit (apart, again, from what is needed based on the actual gravity field). We have no concern about accidental impact with Vesta, even in the lowest orbit. The choice of the lowest radius is a trade-off between the need to go low for the benefit of GRaND on the one hand vs. the time required to travel there and the difficulty of operating so deep in the gravity field. When we are thrusting to low orbits, we are not acquiring the highest quality science data, and at some point it simply isn’t worth the time to continue flying down rather than devoting the time to getting the nuclear spectra. We have a lot to learn about the field, and while the risk of crashing is truly negligible, we still can get a very wild ride. Moreover, with our very large solar arrays, accommodating the gravity gradient torque at low altitude will be a challenge. We can escape from any orbit we can fly to. The total delta-v for Vesta operations is a very small fraction of the flight system’s total capability. We spiral down, and then we spiral out! -------------------- |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 6th June 2024 - 12:27 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |