Opportunity Route Map |
Opportunity Route Map |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() The Insider ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 669 Joined: 3-May 04 Member No.: 73 ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
Founder ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Chairman Posts: 14433 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 ![]() |
And ET gets a guilt-free pass for attachment size, so I vote for the 400x200 as well
![]() |
|
|
Guest_Oersted_* |
![]()
Post
#3
|
Guests ![]() |
And ET gets a guilt-free pass for attachment size, so I vote for the 400x200 as well ![]() I'd suggest upping the picture size to 400x400 pixel images before resizing occurs. I think we probably all had something like 800x600 monitors 5 years ago, whereas now I'd guess the resounding majority of us sit behind 1920x1080 (or similar) monitors. I don't know what that would mean, expenses-wise, for the site, but my guess would be that it wouldn't make a huge difference to the costs (I am a happy contributor, btw). The resized maps are not too pleasant to look at, with the scrunched-up hardly readable text (before clicking on it), so that is why I'm suggesting a 400x400 pixel limit. |
|
|
Guest_Sunspot_* |
![]()
Post
#4
|
Guests ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th June 2024 - 10:23 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
![]() |