Pluto's Expanding Atmosphere Confounds Researchers, Pluto Atomosphere |
Pluto's Expanding Atmosphere Confounds Researchers, Pluto Atomosphere |
Apr 19 2011, 08:26 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 21 Joined: 4-November 10 Member No.: 5509 |
Pluto's Expanding Atmosphere Confounds Researchers
http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2011...onf.html?ref=hp Could these be evidence of geyers like on Triton? |
|
|
Apr 19 2011, 11:53 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 903 Joined: 30-January 05 Member No.: 162 |
Interesting.
A tenuous atmosphere extending almost 1/4 of the way to Charon. There won't be any rings, but as Pluto taketh away, so to it gives a bonus. We've seen discussed here earlier the effectiveness of an atmosphere like this for decel purposes for a lander/orbiter mission. (Most likely a very long time from now) Nice that newly sensed characteristics of Pluto make it more interesting (good for stimulating mission concepts) and easier to maneuver a probe in it's environs. Just doing a little math here, traversing 5000 kilometers of this 'atmosphere' at a start speed of 20 km/sec and slowing (uniformly, the math to do this right is beyond me) to near zero would occur in ~500 seconds. This does not seem unduly severe. (having a probe with an approach speed to Pluto of 20 km/sec seems kinda high though, but let's be generous) In actuality, peak decel would occur at closest approach to Pluto, and the decel rate would increase to that point and then taper off to zero as ones craft exited the other side. There would seem to be quite a variety of orbits available with this technique. (other than closely orbiting Pluto) How big is the Plutonian Hill sphere? As for geysers, sounds good. How does anyone feel about volcanoes? |
|
|
Apr 21 2011, 04:40 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1018 Joined: 29-November 05 From: Seattle, WA, USA Member No.: 590 |
Just doing a little math here, . . .In actuality, peak decel would occur at closest approach to Pluto That's not what I get. The way I figure it, peak deceleration can easily come earlier than closest approach. It's an interesting differential equatation, but it depends a lot on data about the actual composition of the plutonian atmosphere. I do hope that NH is passing far enough from the atmosphere not to have to worry about it. --Greg |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th September 2024 - 11:18 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |