Dawn Survey Orbit Phase, First orbital phase |
Dawn Survey Orbit Phase, First orbital phase |
Jul 17 2011, 09:09 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1729 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
I think it's time we start a new thread
|
|
|
Jul 18 2011, 07:21 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
OK this is making me absolutely crazy. Another image release (yay!) but as with all the previous image releases the reported scale is wrong. They keep reporting the pixel scale for the original, unenlarged image, and then they post an image that has been enlarged (badly) by some non-integer factor and fail to divide the pixel scale by whatever their enlargement factor was.
-------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Jul 19 2011, 01:22 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 52 Joined: 16-November 06 Member No.: 1364 |
OK this is making me absolutely crazy. Another image release (yay!) but as with all the previous image releases the reported scale is wrong. They keep reporting the pixel scale for the original, unenlarged image, and then they post an image that has been enlarged (badly) by some non-integer factor and fail to divide the pixel scale by whatever their enlargement factor was. The last few images were enlarged by an integer factor. Did you find something wrong with how they were enlarged? While the quoted pixel scale is indeed not valid for the enlarged image, it is the relevant number for knowing the smallest detail that can be resolved. |
|
|
Jul 19 2011, 04:51 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
The last few images were enlarged by an integer factor. Did you find something wrong with how they were enlarged? The most recent one wasn't -- its enlargement factor was something around 2.2. And the resolutions stated (and widely requoted) in all the released captions are just wrong. With spherical bodies it is very easy to back out an accurate image resolution from a global image -- measure any diameter and you're done. But for bodies with very different principal axis lengths, especially irregular ones like Vesta, it's hard to do this accurately, which prevents me from doing size comparisons. Size comparison posts are some of the most popular things that I do, which is why this is driving me so crazy. As of yesterday I think the press person at JPL now understands what I am complaining about, so hopefully we'll see captions fixed soon. Of course what I really want is for them to quit enlarging the released images. -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Jul 19 2011, 07:14 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 52 Joined: 16-November 06 Member No.: 1364 |
The most recent one wasn't -- its enlargement factor was something around 2.2. And the resolutions stated (and widely requoted) in all the released captions are just wrong. This image was enlarged by a factor 2 (I know because I enlarged it). The resolution of the image as shown here is actually close to the quoted value. But what do you think of the caption here? The media will take that image and do with it whatever they like, and then quote the original numbers. Yes, I understand your concern about the caption, and no, I didn't write it. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 10th November 2024 - 06:09 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |