Red Dragon |
Red Dragon |
Aug 7 2011, 09:46 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1729 Joined: 3-August 06 From: 43° 35' 53" N 1° 26' 35" E Member No.: 1004 |
'Red Dragon' Mission Mulled as Cheap Search for Mars Life
any opinion on this? would it really make sense adapting a manned spaceship to unmanned Mars landing? I am skeptical... if replying, please remember forum guideline 1.5 |
|
|
Aug 8 2011, 03:20 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14448 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
No, the capsule is still a fixed size and it is a pressurized structure meant to contain personnel and loose cargo. It is ill suited to contain a rover or instrument suite such as Phoenix. All previous landers jettisoned their heat shield to expose the spacecraft, Dragon can't do this and if it could, it would expose a sealed vessel. You're thinking 'how would dragon deliver Phoenix'. That's not the goal here. It's a change in philosophy. The actual question is - what science could you do with a Dragon on the surface. One scientist, at least, clearly thinks there is plenty that can be done. I can see massive potential for Dragon as depicted in that video - and even more with comparatively simple modifications to the vehicle structure. |
|
|
Aug 8 2011, 05:37 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 321 Joined: 6-April 06 From: Cape Canaveral Member No.: 734 |
You're thinking 'how would dragon deliver Phoenix'. No, I was thinking how Dragon could deliver Phoenix's instruments. Scientists will compromise everything for a free ride. There are no simple mods to the structure. Look at the recovered Dragon, the only place for instruments is in the interior. They would have extend through the two hatches. Any other mods and it is not a Dragon anymore. |
|
|
Aug 8 2011, 05:55 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14448 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
|
|
|
Aug 8 2011, 08:16 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 321 Joined: 6-April 06 From: Cape Canaveral Member No.: 734 |
|
|
|
Aug 8 2011, 08:35 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Founder Group: Chairman Posts: 14448 Joined: 8-February 04 Member No.: 1 |
Huh? So the "right mind set" is not to deliver instruments and just land a Dragon capsule. Very very obviously, that is NOT the point I was making. You really are very very determined to start an argument rather than have a discussion, aren't you. QUOTE Ok, I will go back to lurking Please do. |
|
|
Aug 9 2011, 12:12 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 321 Joined: 6-April 06 From: Cape Canaveral Member No.: 734 |
Very very obviously, that is NOT the point I was making. You really are very very determined to start an argument rather than have a discussion, aren't you. Then state your point because you haven't revealed andI know my mind set and it is not wrong. The Dragon is a poor design to deliver any but people and goods. Same thing would apply to the Orion capsule or CST-100. They are structurally wrong for other tasks. They are designed to contain their payloads. Driving rovers out the hatch is ludicrous, the hatch is small and high off the surface. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 31st October 2024 - 11:13 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |