Phobos-Grunt |
Phobos-Grunt |
Jan 22 2005, 02:15 PM
Post
#401
|
|
Interplanetary Dumpster Diver Group: Admin Posts: 4404 Joined: 17-February 04 From: Powell, TN Member No.: 33 |
In Astronomy's February issue, they report that Russia has approved funding for the Phobos-Grunt mission. Design work has gone on since 1997, and the new design is scaled down to fly an a Soyuz rocket instead of the larger Proton. The main purpose is similar to Phobos-2, with the addition of a sample return. Also being discussed is the possibility of it carrying a few "meteorological stations" fof Mars itself. Generally, I have written this mission off as "never going to happen," but with the new Russian alliance with ESA, I wonder if they might be able to actually fly this thing. Also, with Putin's increasingly Soviet-style leadership, and with the likelyhood of lunar missions from China and India, Russian pride might drive this mission. If so, I have a concern. This mission sounds really, really ambitious. And the Russians have never even sent a fully successful Mars orbiter, and that is when they launched them in pairs or triplets. Still, if the mission flies, even if it doesn't bring back Phobos soil it might obtain some interesting results. Here is ESA's Phobos-Grunt page:
http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/ESA_Permanent_...IJFW4QWD_0.html Also, ESA has another page on potential Russian programs, although this seem to be nothing but pipe dreams at the moment. Would be a cool mission though. http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/ESA_Permanent_...0LFW4QWD_0.html And also a page on the only partially realized current Russian project, its program to put instruments on other's spacecraft, such as HEND on Odyssey. http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/ESA_Permanent_...HMFW4QWD_0.html -------------------- |
|
|
Nov 9 2011, 02:53 AM
Post
#402
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 200 Joined: 20-November 05 From: Mare Desiderii Member No.: 563 |
From Google auto-translation:
QUOTE He added that the time to restart the program from the experts there for three days. "Three days". Is that how long they have to figure it out and fix it? Well, looks like we'll get a human translation soon; thanks in advance, "slugnads". |
|
|
Nov 9 2011, 02:57 AM
Post
#403
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 23 Joined: 16-May 08 Member No.: 4112 |
From Google auto-translation: "Three days". Is that how long they have to figure it out and fix it? Well, looks like we'll get a human translation soon; thanks in advance, "slugnads". They have three days to upload new software before the batteries run out, which might confirm the sensor/orientation problem. |
|
|
Nov 9 2011, 03:00 AM
Post
#404
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 200 Joined: 20-November 05 From: Mare Desiderii Member No.: 563 |
They have three days to upload new software before the batteries run out, which might confirm the sensor/orientation problem. Ah yes. From Svetoslav again: "Russian specialists have only three days to upload the new software before the batteries run out of power..." (source: Interfax; Google) |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 1st June 2024 - 12:52 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |