MSL Cruise Phase |
MSL Cruise Phase |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Merciless Robot ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 8784 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 ![]() |
Okay, we're off and running! Please post all comments relating to MSL's transit to Mars here.
-------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 214 Joined: 30-December 05 Member No.: 628 ![]() |
I'm having some trouble with "data dropouts" myself while trying to view the videos - I wanted to review the telemetry data on the evolution of perigee and apogee during the second Centaur burn, because the first time through I did not understand what I was seeing. My recollection is that after a steady increase the apogee figures dropped abruptly somewhere over Madagascar. This may have simply indicated a move to a higher power of 10 on the display but it was too blurry to be sure. The perigee seemed to be stuck somewhere in the 80's or -80's (couldn't tell if it was a negative sign or a "star" in the simulation). This I really did not understand because it persisted even after the spacecraft was well on its way to Mars. Is it just that after a certain point the perigee ceased to update? Maybe some rocket scientist here can explain how the perigee figure would be expected to evolve if we actually continued to track it as the spacecraft approaches escape velocity. Seems to me both apogee and perigee would eventually have to go to infinity at the point where the vehicle transitions to a solar orbit but when it becomes possible to view the video without a "please try again later" message I am sure it will confirm that this is not what we actually saw.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 89 Joined: 27-August 05 From: Eccentric Mars orbit Member No.: 477 ![]() |
(Full inline quote removed- Mod)
The apogee for a perfect parabola is infinite, but if you run the formulas to find the perigee and apogee of an ellipse, on a hyperbola, you will get the correct perigee but a finite, negative apogee. Obviously a distance can never be negative (you can never be closer to me than at my same position, with zero distance) but you can run all the formulas in reverse with this negative apogee and get the correct position and velocity of the spacecraft. Which brings me to my second point: There is in theory enough information in the elements to get the position and velocity of the spacecraft during the burns, if they are all consistent. One thing I don't know is how they handle "altitude". A really common way to do it is to take the radius distance from the center and subtract the equatorial radius of the Earth, but since the Earth is not a perfect sphere, this would result in a negative altitude at launch. So I don't know what you have to add to get back the radius vector, and it may be two different things for different altitudes. I remember seeing one of these simulations where the altitude wasn't in between periapse and apoapse. Back to the original point: Since the apogee took one value and stuck with it after escape velocity was achieved, maybe they just put in some fill value, like -9999999 meters, and translated it to nautical miles. In which case, after escape, the orbital elements become insufficient to reconstruct position and velocity. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 14th June 2024 - 08:58 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
![]() |