Member Questions to Administrators, Matters related to the Forum |
Member Questions to Administrators, Matters related to the Forum |
Jan 1 2012, 10:21 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member Group: Admin Posts: 3108 Joined: 21-December 05 From: Canberra, Australia Member No.: 615 |
If you have a question about Unmanned Spaceflight.com, this is the place to ask it.
|
|
|
Nov 21 2012, 02:39 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 66 Joined: 26-May 06 Member No.: 790 |
I noted the reminder about rule 1.3, so I reread it.
I'm pretty sure that it used to say astrobiology *could* be discussed ONLY within the strict context of specific, related mission goals. Am I misremembering? And if I'm not, can someone say something about the problems that caused the tightening up? Lastly, I appreciate the acknowledgement that a future change might be appropriate. I do understand the tsunami you are keeping at bay, but the idea that the very concept of "organics" cannot be discussed in a forum devoted to a mission looking for them is...quite remarkable, whatever the provocations that spurred it. Cheers. |
|
|
Nov 21 2012, 02:45 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2547 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
I noted the reminder about rule 1.3, so I reread it. http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...ic=7514&hl= -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
Nov 21 2012, 02:53 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 66 Joined: 26-May 06 Member No.: 790 |
Thank you for the pointer. I looked for that context but was unable to find it. A personal message highlights that I was unclear above. When I said "forum devoted to" I was referring to the rule applying to the MSL forum, devoted to Curiosity. Sorry about that. Though I'm not very active, I have been around here for years, following Oppy & Spirit -- and sometimes even non-Mars missions! 8^) I would be very interested in a reply to Floyd's question, which he asked in response to the rule-modification notice you kindly linked to above: My only question is about organics. I can see not trying to link detection of organic compounds to astrobiology, but does this remove all discussion of compounds containing Carbon? Are we not to discuss minerals containing carbonate? Does this mean that Juramike's fantastic lessons on atmospheric chemistry are unwelcome. Maybe you could clarify this a bit... Edit: maybe make a distinction between organic compounds as in organic chemistry and biological compounds as in biochemistry... No need to kill carbon, it is a perfectly good element. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 31st October 2024 - 11:37 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |