High-Temp Electronics For Venus Exploration, recent advances |
High-Temp Electronics For Venus Exploration, recent advances |
Mar 13 2013, 03:36 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 127 Joined: 20-April 05 Member No.: 291 |
(MOD NOTE: Started a new topic for this discussion to continue. Please remember the 'no sci-fi engineering' provision of rule 1.9. Have fun!)
Also, since I'm thinking about surface operations on Venus, the state-of-the-art in high temperature electronics has advanced quite far in the past decade. Its now possible to buy off the shelf chips from vendors designed to operate at the 250-300 C range. Meanwhile basic functionality has been tested at and beyond the temperatures needed for long-term surface operations on Venus: http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/SiC/ http://www.gizmag.com/extreme-silicon-carb...ctronics/16410/ http://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/SiC/publicatio...Contact2010.pdf Another decade or so and a long-term Venus lander could be possible with (practically) off the shelf electronics! |
|
|
Mar 27 2013, 03:24 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Merciless Robot Group: Admin Posts: 8785 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 |
I'm officially your distant relative now, Dan, and I got a few bills...
Seriously, this is not a trivial problem. A Venus lander of any sort either requires a VERY well-controlled temperature environment for its electronics (which IIRC was the Venera strategy) or not only electronic components that can survive extreme temp swings during the cruise phase but also the same for all required electrical connections. The latter are obviously quite vulnerable to materiel expansion/contraction cycles, which ultimately loosen connections over time and introduce either spurious or high-resistance interface points which can do all sorts of nasty things to signal flow. (For example, MIL-STD-1553 data buses really don't like impedance changes; tends to turn perfectly good data words into gibberish.) How I see this playing out is a loosening of environmental control constraints over time for the silicon itself but capability bounded by a hard constraint on connection methods unless suitable (and workable, as Dan pointed out) connection/wiring alloys of some sort can be developed that are extraordinarily resistant to thermal cycling. That's a rather daunting challenge in metallurgy. -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
Mar 27 2013, 01:24 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Admin Posts: 4763 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Glendale, AZ Member No.: 197 |
Seriously, this is not a trivial problem. A Venus lander of any sort either requires a VERY well-controlled temperature environment for its electronics (which IIRC was the Venera strategy) or not only electronic components that can survive extreme temp swings during the cruise phase but also the same for all required electrical connections. It's a real problem but I'm confident that existent materials technology can solve it -- especially the problem of conductive connections. I would imagine a mechanically secure solution such as clamping or spiral threading which is secondarily secured by a high temperature polymer. (If I were building it in my garage I'd be using RTV silicon or two part-epoxy which are reliable to 600F. I'm sure the JPL toolbox has even better stuff in it). The electronic components are another story but frankly I'm pretty certain there are already temperature rated ICs and such in use in military and industrial applications which offer a starting point for this kind of high-temperature electronic circuit design -- probably servos, relays and optical applications as well. -------------------- If Occam had heard my theory, things would be very different now.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th September 2024 - 12:21 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |