ROVER WHEELS: Monitoring changes over time, NOTE: Read back through the thread to avoid repeating misconceptions Options

[DeanM]

[MOD NOTE: This thread follows on a post by Ed Truthan containing a MAHLI mosaic of MSL wheels taken on sol 275.]

Ed: zooming in on that marvellous underbelly MAHLI montage, there appears to be further (and previously noted) deformation of the wheel surfaces.

Damage is most evident in the view of the front-left wheel inner surface.

Such wear has previously been discussed and concerns allayed.

Nevertheless, the front left wheel surface *appears* to have been punctured.



We've only done 700 meters, and have 7000 more to get to Mt Sharp.....

Given that more odometry has now accumulated, is any (re-)new(ed) concern valid?

DeanM

[testguru]

Given the level of damage observed so far on the rover wheels and the small distance traveled, if you linearly extrapolate future damage vs distance traveled, how far can the rover drive before a wheel fails? I know no one can answer that but I would assume modeling is being done to try to answer that question??

I would also assume the rover drives will be planned to avoid sharp rocks whenever possible?

[mcaplinger]

Given the level of damage observed so far on the rover wheels and the small distance traveled, if you linearly extrapolate future damage vs distance traveled, how far can the rover drive before a wheel fails?

I would also assume the rover drives will be planned to avoid sharp rocks whenever possible?

It's not really a linear process. The tire is one solid piece of aluminum. It would have to be ripped all the way across so it started unpeeling from the flexures before driving would be impeded. Like the viewgraphs I linked to earlier said, localized rupture in the tire was expected.

We're talking about sharp pebbles, I don't think driving around them would be feasible.