MSL - Astronomical Observations, Phobos/Deimos, planetary/celestial observations and more |
MSL - Astronomical Observations, Phobos/Deimos, planetary/celestial observations and more |
Jun 29 2013, 05:25 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 4252 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
|
|
|
Aug 22 2013, 09:04 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 22 Joined: 10-August 12 From: Australia Member No.: 6530 |
Quoting Emily: "Point a camera with a 5-degree FOV at a moving speck crossing a moving spot from a rover that was only briefly paused.." This can have been no easy feat! Indeed, how is such precise 'pointing' achieved: gravity provides one vector but Mars (now) has no magnetic field to provide a second. Dean |
|
|
Aug 22 2013, 02:16 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Martian Photographer Group: Members Posts: 352 Joined: 3-March 05 Member No.: 183 |
Indeed, how is such precise 'pointing' achieved: gravity provides one vector but Mars (now) has no magnetic field to provide a second. Sun images show the Sun's position and (optionally) direction of motion in the rover's frame. These allow a full attitude solution or a yaw-only solution. Initial measurement units (gyro-based) update attitude between sun images. MER used a subset of Pancam Sun images. MSL uses Navcam Sun+sky images. The IMU propagates attitude forward, but error builds with drive-time. So the attitude, especially for Sun aims, is precise after a Sun update and before the next drive, and degrades until the next Sun update. The midnight planets page for sol C/369 shows such an update after the drive (and mid-drive imaging). Sol B/3387 shows an update for Opportunity. (In both cases, look for the Sun image/images after "driving...".) |
|
|
Aug 22 2013, 02:50 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 4252 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
MSL uses Navcam Sun+sky images. I didn't realize that - I had assumed MSL used mastcam. Why navcam? Surely it's harder to pinpoint the sun's position in a navcam frame, or in other words the uncertainty on the sun's position would be much larger in a navcam frame than a mastcam frame. That's both because of the lower resolution of navcam, but also because of the overexposure due to lack of solar filter. (I guess you could pinpoint the position from navcam pretty well in one direction, due to the CCD bleeding.) FredK: "Subtracted the average..." Brilliant idea... just freaking brilliant. Thanks a lot Ed, but I have to say I was inspired by what we did several years ago with Spirit's dust devil images. I have no idea who started differencing the images to show DD's more easily.
|
|
|
Aug 22 2013, 03:55 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
Why navcam? Surely it's harder to pinpoint the sun's position in a navcam frame, or in other words the uncertainty on the sun's position would be much larger in a navcam frame than a mastcam frame. That's both because of the lower resolution of navcam, but also because of the overexposure due to lack of solar filter. (I guess you could pinpoint the position from navcam pretty well in one direction, due to the CCD bleeding.) Here a graphical sketch, how a good reference point can be determined from this NRB image: |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 13th June 2024 - 05:02 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |