Member Questions to Administrators, Matters related to the Forum |
Member Questions to Administrators, Matters related to the Forum |
Jan 1 2012, 10:21 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member Group: Admin Posts: 3108 Joined: 21-December 05 From: Canberra, Australia Member No.: 615 |
If you have a question about Unmanned Spaceflight.com, this is the place to ask it.
|
|
|
Apr 21 2014, 06:37 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Done!
-------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
May 29 2014, 11:20 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 105 Joined: 27-August 05 Member No.: 479 |
Done! I would like to do a new post, normally its in the conferences section but I was hoping you folks would consider allowing it to live in the future mars projects section instead, it would be a post about the mars 2020 lander landing site committee meeting of some weeks ago, I spent most of last weekend spending at least 12 hours reading through every PDF file that was presented at the mars 2020 landing site conference and I think I make a decently good post on the conference proceedings and perhaps in future there could be sub threads or a poll on each landing site candidate? years ago I spent alot of time reading up on landing site conferences of present missions and I see some new candidates not mentioned years ago, why? MRO and mars express and other new data informs us of new possibility for landing sites http://marsnext.jpl.nasa.gov/workshops/index.cfm first thread has been covered here already but not in great detail, http://marsnext.jpl.nasa.gov/workshops/201...n%205-13-14.pdf so my first proposed thread would include, new proposed sites will subject to orbital imaging camping http://marsnext.jpl.nasa.gov/workshops/201...straints_v6.pdf The atmosphere will be thicker at mars 2020 EDL so many more landing sites are possible, and possibly a smaller landing ellipse do to some EDl software changes and mars 2020 will be able to land at higher elevations. http://marsnext.jpl.nasa.gov/workshops/201...5_14_14_SCM.pdf this is a "nontraditional" candidate landing site seems to meet the decadel survey and MEPAG requirements, would you vote for it? and why? I propose to make a new thread with perhaps 3 or 4 of these candidate sites with a poll after seeing if the main post gathers any viewers lastly I am going to post the first post here with administrators, to see if you like the content, if so can such a post be migrated to the right spot? |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th September 2024 - 11:44 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |