Hyperion strikes back |
Hyperion strikes back |
Oct 17 2014, 10:55 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 495 Joined: 12-February 12 Member No.: 6336 |
An analysis of Cassini data from 2005 have shown that static electricity from Hyperion briefly did strike the space probe with static electricity when it passed the moon at a distance of 2000 km.
|
|
|
Oct 19 2014, 09:24 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
Hey - really good explanation of the situation. Thanks for taking the trouble to post that.
I echo nprev's question Could its chaotic rotation state have something to do with this as well? Any thoughts? |
|
|
Oct 20 2014, 07:11 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 125 Joined: 18-July 05 Member No.: 438 |
I echo nprev's question Could its chaotic rotation state have something to do with this as well? Any thoughts? Given that the charging times are much, much shorter than the rotation/tumbling period, I doubt that the rotation state is likely to have a signficant effect, apart from making it difficult to predict what the potential is going to be across the surface at any one time. The irregular shape and rugged surface make it difficult to simulate too. oDoug - welcome back! Regarding other bodies... something is in the works; watch this space! |
|
|
Oct 20 2014, 08:44 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 3516 Joined: 4-November 05 From: North Wales Member No.: 542 |
Given that the charging times are much, much shorter than the rotation/tumbling period, I doubt that the rotation state is likely to have a signficant effect I meant the other way around. Uneven charging of the surface could give Hyperion a net electric dipole moment at any given time. This in turn could produce variable torques on the moon, contributing to its chaotic rotation. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 8th June 2024 - 01:40 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |