Philae landing on the nucleus of Comet 67P C-G |
Philae landing on the nucleus of Comet 67P C-G |
Sep 23 2014, 12:16 PM
Post
#1
|
||
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1089 Joined: 19-February 05 From: Close to Meudon Observatory in France Member No.: 172 |
Now, it's time to open a new section devoted to the landing of the Philae lander itself on the nucleus of Comet 67P C-G. Also to answer better the earlier post, http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.p...st&p=212943 and for your information, here is the quick summary (as a "pdf" file) of the events that are expected to occur during landing on the nucleus and after : it's the timeschedule on which we are working to set up our EPO event in Paris. Sequence_ATTERRISSAGE10_UMSF.pdf ( 263.81K ) Number of downloads: 4571 The landing itself should occur around November 11th. We'll keep you informed |
|
|
||
Oct 29 2014, 12:44 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 241 Joined: 22-August 05 From: Stockholm Sweden Member No.: 468 |
|
|
|
Oct 29 2014, 10:15 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 107 Joined: 1-August 14 Member No.: 7227 |
I made a slopemap of site J I'd like to make an elevation map, but I can't find any suitable free program. I tried a couple of "disparity map generators", but I get ugly results... DMAG, StereoPlus... what else could I use? I already 3d-printed the whole comet, now I'd like to 3d-print the landing site too, before landing happens! |
|
|
Oct 29 2014, 10:30 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 241 Joined: 22-August 05 From: Stockholm Sweden Member No.: 468 |
I'd like to make an elevation map, but I can't find any suitable free program. I tried a couple of "disparity map generators", but I get ugly results... DMAG, StereoPlus... what else could I use? I already 3d-printed the whole comet, now I'd like to 3d-print the landing site too, before landing happens! You have to have a resonable disparity generator. preferrably one that understands the two cameras orientation in respect to eachother. (or you will have to bring the pictures into alignment with some other software.) then you will have to tweak and tweak until you have the best possible settings. Then you will probably get something that is resonably ok on a mid to global scale. there will still be local noise. To combat that I would suggest that you use shape from shading to capture the fine details. |
|
|
Oct 29 2014, 01:12 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 107 Joined: 1-August 14 Member No.: 7227 |
You have to have a resonable disparity generator. preferrably one that understands the two cameras orientation in respect to eachother. (or you will have to bring the pictures into alignment with some other software.) Isn't an anaglyph enough? It is already aligned and I can extract images from it with StereoPhotoMaker. http://www.esa.int/var/esa/storage/images/...ull_image_2.png |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th June 2024 - 01:52 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |