Dawn's first orbit, including RC3, March 6, 2015- June 15, 2015 |
Dawn's first orbit, including RC3, March 6, 2015- June 15, 2015 |
Mar 6 2015, 03:23 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 204 Joined: 14-April 06 From: Seattle, WA Member No.: 745 |
Dawn is now officially in orbit around (1) Ceres!
Congratulations, NASA. Nice images of crescent Ceres. NASA Spacecraft Becomes First to Orbit a Dwarf Planet |
|
|
May 5 2015, 09:34 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10183 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
It's right next door to its basin (left edge)! And there is another much more subdued but even larger basin at top center in your cropped image. Besides, on a small object like Ceres basin ejecta can cover a hemisphere, it doesn't need to be that close.
Also, don't be taken in by the 'fresh' appearance of the ejecta. Look at the ejecta of Orientale on the Moon. Old but remarkably fresh-looking. Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PD: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
May 5 2015, 07:14 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 714 Joined: 3-January 08 Member No.: 3995 |
It's right next door to its basin (left edge)! And there is another much more subdued but even larger basin at top center in your cropped image. Besides, on a small object like Ceres basin ejecta can cover a hemisphere, it doesn't need to be that close. Also, don't be taken in by the 'fresh' appearance of the ejecta. Look at the ejecta of Orientale on the Moon. Old but remarkably fresh-looking. I've been straining to interpret the stuff as ejecta and other impact effects, but some things seem 'off'. - The 'tilled ground' seems to have an irregular or even patchy distribution. The edges appear abrupt in some cases. Ejecta usually grades into the surrounding terrain in a regular manner -- or so it seems/appears, at least. - There are no obvious source basins for the ejecta/tilled ground. Nearby candidate craters/basins are either partially covered in the stuff, or appear too old or degraded. I was eagerly awaiting to see a dramatic basin on the image released on May 4, but instead was disappointed by a barely visible outline. - The crater size distribution is odd. I would expect more small- and medium-sized craters on ejecta from a degraded basin. - Speaking of crater size distribution, I'm still amazed by the number of large craters around the south pole. What 'happened' to all the smaller ones (that seem to 'prefer' the north pole)? - The curved valleys are a surprise. I would expect straight valleys (grabens or crater chains) on a primitive body like Ceres. Slumping causes curved grabens, but that doesn't seem to be in play here. My eyes even see 'spiral' patterns of valleys surrounding a couple basins, but more imagery is needed to address that.... - I look forward to more puzzling questions in the coming days, weeks and months.... |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 4th June 2024 - 10:59 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |