JunoCam "Marble Movie", July 10 through October 14 |
JunoCam "Marble Movie", July 10 through October 14 |
Aug 9 2016, 09:13 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Almost 900 MB of "Marble Movie" data now available: https://www.missionjuno.swri.edu/junocam/processing
-------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Aug 13 2016, 11:53 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
Very nice I think you should add "SwRI" to your list of image credits (between JPL and MSSS).
-------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Aug 14 2016, 02:39 AM
Post
#3
|
|||
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
Very nice I think you should add "SwRI" to your list of image credits (between JPL and MSSS). Thanks! Re crediting: I'm a little confused, since the missionjuno website credits only to NASA/JPL/MSSS. But I may include SwRI in future runs again, as I've done before. Here is the cleaned version of Marble Movie part 1 AVI (602 RGB still frames), together with the synopsis of 600 frames, as submitted to missionjuno. I'm not yet quite happy with the dimming of the Moons near Jupiter in the AVIs, since in the meanwhile I've been able to demonstrate, that this isn't a necessity: However, the revised method requires accurate alignment between subsequent images, in order to allow for good differencing results. This is not identical, but related to better color alignment. To be able to improve this, for the Marble Movie stills beginning with #2450, and for accurate PJ images, I should focus again more on fine-tuning the camera calibration. I'm still far from having inferred the accuracy feasible with these images. It might even be possible to do this fully automated. Re grey scale: This would be possible. However, it's to be applied after cleaning (postprocess) from hot pixels and CRs. But I'm unsure, whether it wouldn't be better to work with RGB as a test for RGB alignment accuracy, and as a motivation to improve it. If the resuts are urgently required for public release, it's something else. I may add this option, just in case. Thanks again for your interesting observations and advices! |
||
|
|||
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 21st September 2024 - 04:55 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |