Perijove 1 (PJ1), August 27, 2016 |
Perijove 1 (PJ1), August 27, 2016 |
Sep 2 2016, 04:45 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 5172 Joined: 4-August 05 From: Pasadena, CA, USA, Earth Member No.: 454 |
New images released!
And raw images at various processing levels from PJ1 are now in the JunoCam gallery. -------------------- My website - My Patreon - @elakdawalla on Twitter - Please support unmannedspaceflight.com by donating here.
|
|
|
Sep 19 2016, 12:32 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 16 Joined: 4-September 16 Member No.: 8038 |
Brian Burns - Thanks so much for the suggestion of SpiceyPy! I’ve taken a quick look and it certainly seems slightly more accessible than the command line/C toolset. And your example is very helpful - I’ll start breaking that down tonight. I’ll take a look into ISIS too, as getting any help with the reprojection would be fantastic!
Roman : The images you’ve posted are excellent - I entirely agree with the ‘Starry Night’ reference, too Gerald : The image you posted on the 10th is incredibly beautiful. I’d love to know how you’re achieving the levels of contrast present. For those interested, I’ve finally finished my article explaining the Visual Effects techniques I used to create the images I posted back on page 3 of this thread, and you can find it here : Constructing Jupiter. The aim with the article was to serve as a suitable introduction to those with knowledge of JUNO but not of VFX, and hopefully vice versa too. If anyone has any questions however, just let me know. Thanks again! |
|
|
Sep 20 2016, 11:39 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Junior Member Group: Members Posts: 54 Joined: 7-July 16 From: Austin, Texas Member No.: 7991 |
For those interested, I’ve finally finished my article explaining the Visual Effects techniques I used to create the images I posted back on page 3 of this thread, and you can find it here : Constructing Jupiter. The aim with the article was to serve as a suitable introduction to those with knowledge of JUNO but not of VFX, and hopefully vice versa too. If anyone has any questions however, just let me know. Thanks for the great writeup! I hadn't understood the intricacies of assembling the JunoCam images, and it's interesting to learn about another image processing system. And apparently it's free for non-commercial use (normally $9300 - quite a bargain!) - https://www.thefoundry.co.uk/products/nuke/buy/ down at the bottom. I like how you can warp and align channels so easily - that would be pretty useful for Voyager images where there was a lot of movement between the channels. But I wonder why there was a need for so much adjustment for JunoCam, if the different channels were taken at the same time? This is probably my favorite image from Juno so far - nice colors - I'm not sure ISIS will be usable with the Juno images yet - there's an issue filed here https://isis.astrogeology.usgs.gov/fixit/issues/1461 for making a Juno camera model. And I'm not sure how many people here use ISIS, aside from JohnVV - he started a thread here - http://www.unmannedspaceflight.com/index.php?showtopic=8198. But maybe you could achieve the same thing with your system + SPICE data, and projecting an image onto a sphere. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 3rd June 2024 - 10:26 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |