Juno perijove 4, February 2, 2017 |
Juno perijove 4, February 2, 2017 |
Jan 20 2017, 11:16 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
It's time to open a perijove-4 thread.
Voting is open for another two days. So, don't hesitate too long. Besides the discussion and the POIs on the mission page, you might consider John Roger's detailed discussion of several interesting features. If everything goes well, all instruments will be switched on. |
|
|
Feb 21 2017, 06:05 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
The most accurate published times for perijoves 6 to 8 I'm aware of are
PJ06 2017 May 19, 17:44:04 UTC PJ07 2017 July 11, 1:55:56 UTC PJ08 2017 September 1, 21:50:01 UTC But I think, that the times will be off by up to several minutes, since for PJ05, there is already a discrepancy of 66 seconds to the current prediction in SPICE. The data are of 2016 December 28 from the latest update of the professional Earth based observation plan. (This site is easier to read, at least in my browser, but might become obsolete with the next update.) |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 27th September 2024 - 12:09 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |