Juno perijove 5, March 27, 2017 |
Juno perijove 5, March 27, 2017 |
Mar 16 2017, 10:24 PM
Post
#1
|
|
IMG to PNG GOD Group: Moderator Posts: 2254 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Near fire and ice Member No.: 38 |
Juno's perijove 5 is coming up less than two weeks from now - it's on March 27, 2017.
The target selection voting has started and is open until almost four days from now: https://www.missionjuno.swri.edu/junocam/voting?current A large part of the data volume will be reserved for polar time lapse sequences though. John Rogers has written a helpful summary of the upcoming perijove 5: https://www.britastro.org/node/9377 |
|
|
Apr 4 2017, 12:00 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
Outstanding work, Björn!
I didn't yet include full illumination adjustment into my renditions, but am curious how those results will eventually compare to yours. One to three CPU cores are running almost around the clock. So, it will take another few days, before I've completed all "straightforward" products, and find time to dig a little deeper into the data. I've tried the 109 / 110 pair as stereo, and am not yet quite sure, whether a 3D effect is perceptible. There is also some risk to confuse cloud motion with parallax. Here some of my "straightforward" products: PJ05 Approach Movie (and cropped close-ups), level 1, decompanded stills. All images rendered with the same set of parameters (best for distant images), therefore some of them may not be perfectly rgb aligned. |
|
|
Apr 4 2017, 05:21 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 1669 Joined: 5-March 05 From: Boulder, CO Member No.: 184 |
I've tried the 109 / 110 pair as stereo, and am not yet quite sure, whether a 3D effect is perceptible. There is also some risk to confuse cloud motion with parallax. The blinking animation Gerald posted earlier was useful to look at in the context of seeing things in 3D (as a complement to an anaglyph or side-by-side pair). I think it could show some parallax if it is registered more closely. I suppose the risks would be mainly the cloud motion in a rotating spot, or some type of vertical wind shear in a jet region. Other more uniform movements could be compensated for. -------------------- Steve [ my home page and planetary maps page ]
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 24th September 2024 - 03:57 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |