South to Vera Rubin Ridge, (Sites 62-63, Sols 1659-1726, Apr 6 2017-Jun 14 2017) |
South to Vera Rubin Ridge, (Sites 62-63, Sols 1659-1726, Apr 6 2017-Jun 14 2017) |
Apr 7 2017, 07:24 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Solar System Cartographer Group: Members Posts: 10229 Joined: 5-April 05 From: Canada Member No.: 227 |
OK, we have left the dunes, and it's time for a new chapter in our story as we head south to Vera Rubin (formerly known as Hematite) Ridge.
Phil -------------------- ... because the Solar System ain't gonna map itself.
Also to be found posting similar content on https://mastodon.social/@PhilStooke Maps for download (free PDF: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/comm...Cartography.pdf NOTE: everything created by me which I post on UMSF is considered to be in the public domain (NOT CC, public domain) |
|
|
May 9 2017, 08:34 PM
Post
#2
|
||||
Member Group: Members Posts: 866 Joined: 15-March 05 From: Santa Cruz, CA Member No.: 196 |
layer flake stereo of sol1688, presumably one of the '_Brook' vein targets. I'm not sure what the story is with that 'hole' apparently punched in the distressed area with Mahli pin chevrons apparently dragged behind.. the visible Z-offset stripes perhaps due to scan differences in the images being overlaid and made apparent in the stereo, the Mahli frame maybe crept a bit during exposure due to MSL settling?
|
|||
|
||||
May 9 2017, 10:10 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 4256 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 |
the visible Z-offset stripes perhaps due to scan differences in the images being overlaid and made apparent in the stereo, the Mahli frame maybe crept a bit during exposure due to MSL settling? If those are focus stacks, that's the kind of thing you expect since the process combines parts of the various images with the best focus. The original images shouldn't show those effects. |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th September 2024 - 02:43 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |