Juno Perijove 15, September 07, 2018 |
Juno Perijove 15, September 07, 2018 |
Sep 8 2018, 12:09 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 923 Joined: 10-November 15 Member No.: 7837 |
-------------------- |
|
|
Sep 8 2018, 05:07 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2346 Joined: 7-December 12 Member No.: 6780 |
Btw., this is the -- technical -- description I've added to the missionjuno upload:
The image is reprojected according to a slightly modified, and still preliminary geometrical camera model, cleaned from most repetitive camera artifacts and from most energetic particle hits, approximatly illumination adjusted, and stretched with gamma=4 with respect to radiometric values. Applied camera geometry: pinhole focal length 1482.5 (square) pixels, Brownian radial distortion parameters K1=-6.0E-8, K2=3.0E-14, CX=809, CY=610.01, for all filters, relative to system with the following lower edge of readout regions: red 306, green 461, blue 616, left-most pixel column at x=0. Juno rotation period=80.935 interframe delays, and roughly estimted to 30.063 sec, rotation phase of CCD around JunoCam's optical axis = 0.00153 radians relative to orthonormal frame defined by Juno's spin. Rotational angle around JunoCam's x-axis has been adjusted manually. Geometry shift due to TDI has been neglected, as well as velocity aberration. Assumed Jupiter shape model: 1 bar IAU Jupiter Maclaurin sheroid, rotating according to L3 longitude system. Linear radiometric weights applied to decompanded colors: 0.88 for red, 1.0 for green, 2.17 for blue. Color interpolation is bilinear. Effects of global flat field and stray light have been neglected. Resolution is 30 degrees per degree in an equdistant cylindrical system centered to the camera at image stop time, with an axis parallel to Juno's spin axis. The rendered field of view is 60x180 degrees. |
|
|
Sep 8 2018, 07:50 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Member Group: Members Posts: 425 Joined: 18-September 17 Member No.: 8250 |
Linear radiometric weights applied to decompanded colors: 0.88 for red, 1.0 for green, 2.17 for blue. Color interpolation is bilinear. Effects of global flat field and stray light have been neglected. I was pleasantly surprised that implementing the flat field correction cleared up the repetitive artifacts without need for any additional masking and filling. (For TDI=1 images) FWIW, my current flat field derived color balance is {0.838223, 1., 2.37871} QUOTE Resolution is 30 degrees per degree... Should be "Resolution is 30 pixels per degree..." |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd September 2024 - 04:42 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |