Juno Perijove 22, September 12, 2019 |
Juno Perijove 22, September 12, 2019 |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2518 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 ![]() |
Images have started appearing on missionjuno.
-------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
||
![]() Senior Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4252 Joined: 17-January 05 Member No.: 152 ![]() |
Stunning, Bjorn. I always appreciate the attempt at true colour.
I suppose you've done some masking of the sky - the pixel values are zero in the sky, but small though nonzero in the shadow, as a gamma-tweak illustrates: Is that just a nonzero black level in the shadow? Another idea would be real scattered illumination from the illuminated atmosphere outside the shadow, or illumination from partially sunlit moons (other than Io). Both those seem unlikely. |
|
|
||
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() IMG to PNG GOD ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderator Posts: 2251 Joined: 19-February 04 From: Near fire and ice Member No.: 38 ![]() |
Stunning, Bjorn. I always appreciate the attempt at true colour. I suppose you've done some masking of the sky - the pixel values are zero in the sky, but small though nonzero in the shadow, as a gamma-tweak illustrates: Yes, I did some feathered masking in Photoshop near the limb. Otherwise I'd get a sharp, unrealistic cutoff in the dark (but not totally black) area a bit outside of Jupiter's limb. This is because I reprojected the raw framelets to simple cylindrical projection and added 200 km to Jupiter's radius when reprojecting to avoid losing Jupiter's sky (which usually happens if I use the cloudtop radius value). A related point: knowing the geometry we should be able to plot the edge of the umbra on the image, and then measure how much scattered light is visible inside the umbra - perhaps interesting from the atmospheric science point of view? This would be difficult because the shadow contains stray light from the instrument as pointed out in an earlier post. This scattered light varies in non-trivial fashion depending on the viewing geometry, the sun direction etc. I haven't attempted to model these effects and correct for them. However, if memory serves there are some Galileo images where a big satellite shadow is visible. These images might have less stray light and/or be easier to calibrate if measurements of the umbra brightness are desired - I suspect compression artifacts in the Galileo images might make this impossible to measure properly though. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2024 - 03:11 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
![]() |