Europa Clipper Development, Build And Prelaunch Activities Options

[nprev]

The spacecraft has entered its preliminary design review phase, so I think it's time to begin discussion of what promises to be a fascinating journey to one of the most interesting destinations in the Solar System. Dr. Robert Pappalardo, the mission's chief scientist, delivered an overview of Europa as well as a top-level description of instrumentation and objectives during a talk tonight at the Griffith Observatory as part of their monthly "All Space Considered" series, so that serves as a good starting point. His presentation starts at 29:35.

As a reminder, please carefully review rule 1.3 before commenting. In fact, please review all of them. Thanks!


Europa Clipper Presentation (29:35)

[Explorer1]

$178 million is pocket change compared with SLS anyway. Massive savings by any measures (I could say more about SLS, but the p-word would be involved)....

Having a launch vehicle finalized is a big milestone; will be an impressive sight!

[StargazeInWonder]

This description of the Europa Clipper radar instrument, REASON, has a date of 2015, but seems to remain valid:

https://www.lpi.usra.edu/opag/meetings/aug2.../8_f_REASON.pdf

There is good reason to believe that the icy shell will have a fair degree of global consistency for depth and structure, with local exceptions. The radar campaign of Europa Clipper will not map Europa's surface comprehensively, but rather provide a partial grid of widely-separated tracks, with good vertical resolution along those tracks. This should provide excellent coverage of the global parameters for the shell's structure, surface texture, and – if existing conceptions of the shell's
depth and REASON's performance hold – thickness. If exceptions to the global trends (eg, pockets of liquid water closer to the surface) are not very rare, then the grid of ground tracks will intersect them, sampling them occasionally. I guess if there's an extended mission, there would be high priority on additional ground tracks to target areas of suspected interest that were missed or grazed during the main mission. The coverage map in the linked paper shows that at least in many locations the coverage will be pretty dense. Amusingly, the ground tracks look quite similar in distribution to the linea features around longitude 225W and elsewhere, so hopefully we don't end up just missing something of interest if the ground tracks remain parallel to geological features for thousands of km, just missing them along the entire length.