UMSF Changes Ahead- PLEASE READ |
UMSF Changes Ahead- PLEASE READ |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Merciless Robot ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin Posts: 8784 Joined: 8-December 05 From: Los Angeles Member No.: 602 ![]() |
Hey, everybody. Members of the admin/mod team met this week with The Planetary Society (at their request), and the bottom line is that the Forum will be transforming in several ways in the near future. As those of you who are TPS members probably already know they've rolled out a new interactive interface recently and their initial thought was to incorporate us into this in some way. During our discussions we made it clear that above all else we must preserve the high quality of discourse here and accessiblity of same to both the amateur and professional spaceflight communities at large. We feel very strongly that this unique synthesis benefits both communities substantially.
That said, we are also painfully aware that our current Forum software & interface is, in the words of one member of our team, "very 00s". We badly need a more modern, functional, accessible and sustainable platform, and there was considerable discussion as to what the best options for that might be. TPS agreed to investigate a bit from their side...but more importantly, this is where you the Forum members come in. We respectfully ask all of you to please share your thoughts and suggestions on this issue. In particular, we would like to know your ideas in the following areas: 1. What aspects/functions of the current incarnation of UMSF do you feel are the most important to preserve? By this we mean things like topic searchability, opportunity to engage with subject matter experts. etc. It is likely that the current site will be archived with reachback capability, so this is the perfect time to tell us what you like & what you don't about the way the place functions now so V2 will hopefully be a significant improvement in as many ways as we can do that. 2. What things would you like to see in a future version of the Forum? Should mention up front that years ago we decided to change the name to RoboticSpaceflight.com but for various reasons that was too difficult for us to implement in practical terms with our limited time & skill sets (stuff like link migration, etc.). However, with this new major revamp that change will finally occur. Aside from that, we'd like to know what sort of modernized interface(s) you would like to see, and especially any recommendations in that regard based on your own experiences elsewhere on the web. And of course any other relevant ideas anybody may have would be most welcome. This is your time to shine; let's hear it! ![]() Thanks to you all for your help, and as always for your superb contributions to our special little corner of the net. -------------------- A few will take this knowledge and use this power of a dream realized as a force for change, an impetus for further discovery to make less ancient dreams real.
|
|
|
![]() |
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Member ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 101 Joined: 3-May 12 From: Massachusetts, USA Member No.: 6392 ![]() |
As a daily-reader and occasional-poster, I have been happy enough with the mechanics of the UMSF forums software. A very important feature to me is the ability to see a list of recent topics and replies, as provided by this forum's "View New Posts" feature. I think the long history of posted content is a very valuable asset. I believe topics that are years or even decades old should remain eligible for new replies (something that some forums prohibit via an auto-locking feature after some amount of time, such as six months). The more that this forum's existing content becomes harder to access and disjointed from any new "active" forum system, the less I will be happy. Ideally the current content could be migrated more-or-less intact to the hypothetical new forum system (sadly, I suppose that is very unlikely to happen).
The basic organization of a forum - a persistent hierarchy with categories, topics, and replies, is much preferred over an infinite-scrolling chronologically-based presentation (such as used by X/Twitter and Facebook's feed). I would not use UMSF if it adopted a "feed" style presentation. A change in forum software might cause me minimal disruption, or it might cause me to cease using UMSF, depending on the nature of the new software. Attracting new members is fine in-and-of itself, but odds are that a major increase in membership (specifically in members who post) would probably decrease the average quality of posts. That would be bad, possibly fatal to the forum. I appreciate the fact that The Planetary Society (of which I am a member) wants to expand its reach and impact. But I worry about the apparent focus by TPS on image-processing. To me, that is not a primary reason why I visit this forum. I like seeing "space images" posted here, to be sure, but other information such as mission updates, discussions of spacecraft operations and engineering challenges, are just as interesting as imagery to me. |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 17th June 2024 - 08:51 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |
![]() |