Juno Perijove 58, February 3, 2024 |
Juno Perijove 58, February 3, 2024 |
Jan 4 2024, 05:21 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2517 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
(Started a new thread to avoid cluttering up the PJ57 thread with PJ58 discussion.)
-------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
Jan 10 2024, 05:35 PM
Post
#2
|
|||
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3233 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
for 17:49 this is what I get:
This does add coverage to the west of what 17:50 can get, particularly Masubi, and at decent resolution, 1.1 km/pixel at center of disk. 17:53 doesn't seem to add much and some of that can be recovered by starting the last set a minute earlier (17:55) I will note that the leading hemisphere is the other big gap in our map of Io where the best resolution data from Galileo/Voyager/New Horizons was ~7–8 km/pixel and this would definitely help fill that gap. -------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
||
|
|||
Jan 11 2024, 05:10 PM
Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2517 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
for 17:49 this is what I get... This does add coverage to the west of what 17:50 can get, particularly Masubi, and at decent resolution, 1.1 km/pixel at center of disk. Except Junocam isn't seeing the center of the disk at that point. IMHO 17:49 is too oblique. I considered bumping everything back 30 seconds so starting at 17:49:30 but that's not a clear winner to me either, thoughts? And you have to consider that due to spin phase uncertainty the position is uncertain by a spin period. Whatever we do, I have a soft deadline of EOD today to decide. -------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th June 2024 - 11:46 AM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |