Juno Perijove 58, February 3, 2024 |
Juno Perijove 58, February 3, 2024 |
Jan 4 2024, 05:21 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Senior Member Group: Members Posts: 2542 Joined: 13-September 05 Member No.: 497 |
(Started a new thread to avoid cluttering up the PJ57 thread with PJ58 discussion.)
-------------------- Disclaimer: This post is based on public information only. Any opinions are my own.
|
|
|
Jan 23 2024, 10:53 PM
Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member Group: Moderator Posts: 3241 Joined: 11-February 04 From: Tucson, AZ Member No.: 23 |
The resolution will roughly match JNCE_2023364_57C00023_V01, so the second of the images from the last encounter, and at a similar emission angle, but at higher phase angles (110° vs 90°). JNCE_2023364_57C00022_V01 had better pixel scale at Loki, but at a higher emission angle.
-------------------- &@^^!% Jim! I'm a geologist, not a physicist!
The Gish Bar Times - A Blog all about Jupiter's Moon Io |
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd September 2024 - 12:54 PM |
RULES AND GUIDELINES Please read the Forum Rules and Guidelines before posting. IMAGE COPYRIGHT |
OPINIONS AND MODERATION Opinions expressed on UnmannedSpaceflight.com are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of UnmannedSpaceflight.com or The Planetary Society. The all-volunteer UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderation team is wholly independent of The Planetary Society. The Planetary Society has no influence over decisions made by the UnmannedSpaceflight.com moderators. |
SUPPORT THE FORUM Unmannedspaceflight.com is funded by the Planetary Society. Please consider supporting our work and many other projects by donating to the Society or becoming a member. |